Rental Housing Deposits and Health Care Use.

IF 9.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Margae J Knox, Elizabeth A Hernandez, Jennifer Ahern, Daniel M Brown, Hector P Rodriguez, Mark D Fleming, Amanda L Brewster
{"title":"Rental Housing Deposits and Health Care Use.","authors":"Margae J Knox, Elizabeth A Hernandez, Jennifer Ahern, Daniel M Brown, Hector P Rodriguez, Mark D Fleming, Amanda L Brewster","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.2802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Housing deposits and tenancy supports have become new Medicaid benefits in multiple states; however, evidence on impacts from these specific housing interventions is limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the association of rental housing deposits and health care use among Medicaid beneficiaries receiving social needs case management as part of a Whole-Person Care (Medicaid 1115 waiver) pilot program in California.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cohort study compared changes in health care use among a group of adults who received a housing deposit between October 2018 and December 2021 along with case management vs a matched comparison group who received case management only in Contra Costa County, California, a large county in the San Francisco Bay Area. All participants were enrolled in health and social needs case management based on elevated risk of acute care use. Data analysis took place from March 2023 to June 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Rental housing deposit funds that covered 1-time moving transition costs. Funds averaged $1750 per recipient.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Changes in hospitalizations, emergency department visits, primary care visits, specialty care visits, behavioral health visits, psychiatric emergency services, or detention intakes during the 6 months before vs 6 months after deposit receipt. Changes 12 months before and after deposit receipt were examined as a sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1690 case management participants, 845 received a housing deposit (362 [42.8%] <40 years old; 422 [49.9%] male) and 845 received case management only (367 [43.4%] <40 years old; 426 [50.4%] male). In adjusted analyses, deposit recipients had no statistically significant differential changes in health care use for any measure compared to participants who received case management alone. Twelve-month sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cohort study, compared to case management only, housing deposits with case management were not associated with short-term changes in health care use. There may be other unmeasured health benefits or downstream benefits from greater case management engagement. States considering housing deposits as an expanded Medicaid benefit may need to temper expectations about short-term health care use impacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11380099/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.2802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Housing deposits and tenancy supports have become new Medicaid benefits in multiple states; however, evidence on impacts from these specific housing interventions is limited.

Objective: To evaluate the association of rental housing deposits and health care use among Medicaid beneficiaries receiving social needs case management as part of a Whole-Person Care (Medicaid 1115 waiver) pilot program in California.

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study compared changes in health care use among a group of adults who received a housing deposit between October 2018 and December 2021 along with case management vs a matched comparison group who received case management only in Contra Costa County, California, a large county in the San Francisco Bay Area. All participants were enrolled in health and social needs case management based on elevated risk of acute care use. Data analysis took place from March 2023 to June 2024.

Exposure: Rental housing deposit funds that covered 1-time moving transition costs. Funds averaged $1750 per recipient.

Main outcomes and measures: Changes in hospitalizations, emergency department visits, primary care visits, specialty care visits, behavioral health visits, psychiatric emergency services, or detention intakes during the 6 months before vs 6 months after deposit receipt. Changes 12 months before and after deposit receipt were examined as a sensitivity analysis.

Results: Of 1690 case management participants, 845 received a housing deposit (362 [42.8%] <40 years old; 422 [49.9%] male) and 845 received case management only (367 [43.4%] <40 years old; 426 [50.4%] male). In adjusted analyses, deposit recipients had no statistically significant differential changes in health care use for any measure compared to participants who received case management alone. Twelve-month sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study, compared to case management only, housing deposits with case management were not associated with short-term changes in health care use. There may be other unmeasured health benefits or downstream benefits from greater case management engagement. States considering housing deposits as an expanded Medicaid benefit may need to temper expectations about short-term health care use impacts.

租房押金和医疗保健使用。
重要性:在多个州,住房押金和租赁支持已成为新的医疗补助福利;然而,有关这些特定住房干预措施影响的证据却很有限:目的:评估作为加利福尼亚州 "全人护理"(Medicaid 1115 豁免计划)试点项目的一部分,接受社会需求个案管理的医疗补助受益人的租房押金与医疗服务使用之间的关系:这项队列研究比较了加利福尼亚州康特拉科斯塔县(旧金山湾区的一个大县)在 2018 年 10 月至 2021 年 12 月期间获得住房押金并接受个案管理的一组成人与仅接受个案管理的匹配对比组在医疗保健使用方面的变化。所有参与者都根据急性病护理使用风险的升高情况加入了健康和社会需求个案管理。数据分析时间为 2023 年 3 月至 2024 年 6 月:租房押金,用于支付一次性搬家过渡费用。每位受助者平均可获得 1750 美元的资金:在收到押金前 6 个月与收到押金后 6 个月期间,住院、急诊就诊、初级保健就诊、专科护理就诊、行为健康就诊、精神科急诊服务或拘留入院人数的变化。作为一项敏感性分析,还研究了收到押金前后 12 个月的变化情况:在 1690 名个案管理参与者中,有 845 人收到了住房押金(362 人[42.8%] ):在这项队列研究中,与单纯的个案管理相比,有个案管理的住房押金与医疗服务使用的短期变化无关。更多地参与个案管理可能会带来其他未衡量的健康益处或下游益处。考虑将住房押金作为扩大的医疗补助福利的州可能需要降低对短期医疗保健使用影响的预期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信