The impact of Covid-19 on support teams.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Raquel Malheiros Faraco, Ole Broberg, Francisco José De Castro Moura Duarte
{"title":"The impact of Covid-19 on support teams.","authors":"Raquel Malheiros Faraco, Ole Broberg, Francisco José De Castro Moura Duarte","doi":"10.3233/WOR-230565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This paper investigates the pandemic remote work impacts and learning on onshore teams that support offshore activities. Wells construction and maintenance involve unpredictabilities, requiring support teams to help the crew onboard the rig to adapt the operations to the reality of the well. Ergonomics and Human Factors (E/HF) literature presented the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic remote work on knowledge workers' health and well-being. Still, it lacked studies on the impacts on work activities of the industrial sector.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Since safety knowledge is continuously and collectively developed in the experts' day-to-day work activities, the research objective is to identify the impacts and learnings of remote work on the support teams' safety knowledge management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Ergonomic Work Analysis (EWA) guided the problem understanding, activities observations, and data analysis. The Work System Model (WSM) was the framework for systematizing data from 117 interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicate a significant reduction in interactions during the pandemic, making information and safety knowledge sharing more challenging and weakening team members' cooperation. However, no impact on performance was reported. Working from home reduced interruptions and increased focus, facilitating individual tasks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The research identifies collective and individual strategies developed by the team to cope with remote work. The findings confirm Management Literature findings on reducing interaction, hampering nonverbal communication, and increasing the amount of data. However, communication applications used during the pandemic have expanded rapidly, allowing faster access to team members, improving connectivity onshore/offshore, and making it a valuable legacy of the COVID-19 lockdown.</p>","PeriodicalId":51373,"journal":{"name":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-230565","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This paper investigates the pandemic remote work impacts and learning on onshore teams that support offshore activities. Wells construction and maintenance involve unpredictabilities, requiring support teams to help the crew onboard the rig to adapt the operations to the reality of the well. Ergonomics and Human Factors (E/HF) literature presented the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic remote work on knowledge workers' health and well-being. Still, it lacked studies on the impacts on work activities of the industrial sector.

Objective: Since safety knowledge is continuously and collectively developed in the experts' day-to-day work activities, the research objective is to identify the impacts and learnings of remote work on the support teams' safety knowledge management.

Methods: The Ergonomic Work Analysis (EWA) guided the problem understanding, activities observations, and data analysis. The Work System Model (WSM) was the framework for systematizing data from 117 interviews.

Results: The results indicate a significant reduction in interactions during the pandemic, making information and safety knowledge sharing more challenging and weakening team members' cooperation. However, no impact on performance was reported. Working from home reduced interruptions and increased focus, facilitating individual tasks.

Conclusions: The research identifies collective and individual strategies developed by the team to cope with remote work. The findings confirm Management Literature findings on reducing interaction, hampering nonverbal communication, and increasing the amount of data. However, communication applications used during the pandemic have expanded rapidly, allowing faster access to team members, improving connectivity onshore/offshore, and making it a valuable legacy of the COVID-19 lockdown.

Covid-19 对支持团队的影响。
背景:本文研究了大流行病远程工作对支持海上活动的陆上团队的影响和学习。油井建设和维护涉及到不可预测性,需要支持团队帮助钻井平台上的工作人员根据油井的实际情况调整操作。人体工程学和人为因素(E/HF)文献介绍了 COVID-19 大流行病远程工作对知识工作者健康和福祉的影响。然而,这些文献缺乏对工业部门工作活动影响的研究:由于安全知识是在专家的日常工作活动中持续、集体发展的,因此研究目标是确定远程工作对支持团队安全知识管理的影响和学习:方法:人体工程学工作分析法(EWA)指导问题理解、活动观察和数据分析。工作系统模型(WSM)是系统整理 117 个访谈数据的框架:结果表明,在大流行病期间,互动明显减少,使信息和安全知识共享更具挑战性,并削弱了团队成员的合作。不过,没有报告称这对工作表现产生了影响。在家工作减少了干扰,提高了专注度,促进了个人任务的完成:研究确定了团队为应对远程工作而制定的集体和个人策略。研究结果证实了《管理文献》关于减少互动、阻碍非语言交流和增加数据量的结论。不过,大流行病期间使用的通信应用程序已得到迅速扩展,可以更快地与团队成员联系,改善了岸上/离岸的连接,成为 COVID-19 封锁的宝贵遗产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation
Work-A Journal of Prevention Assessment & Rehabilitation PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
30.40%
发文量
739
期刊介绍: WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation is an interdisciplinary, international journal which publishes high quality peer-reviewed manuscripts covering the entire scope of the occupation of work. The journal''s subtitle has been deliberately laid out: The first goal is the prevention of illness, injury, and disability. When this goal is not achievable, the attention focuses on assessment to design client-centered intervention, rehabilitation, treatment, or controls that use scientific evidence to support best practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信