The relationship of early expressed milk quantity and later full breastmilk feeding after very preterm birth: A cohort study.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Ilana Levene, Frances O'Brien, Mary Fewtrell, Maria A Quigley
{"title":"The relationship of early expressed milk quantity and later full breastmilk feeding after very preterm birth: A cohort study.","authors":"Ilana Levene, Frances O'Brien, Mary Fewtrell, Maria A Quigley","doi":"10.1111/mcn.13719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When infants cannot directly breastfeed after birth, mothers are advised to initiate lactation through mechanical expression. Families are recommended to target an expression volume of at least 500-750 mL by Day 14 after birth, as this is considered a 'critical window' to establish milk supply. This is challenging for many mothers after a very preterm birth. This article explores the relationship of early milk quantity and later full breastmilk feeding as a 'gold standard' outcome, using statistical techniques designed for diagnostic tests. A cohort of 132 mothers of infants born at 23 + 0 to 31 + 6 weeks' gestational age submitted expressing logs on Day 4, 14 and 21 after birth and provided later feeding outcome. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the following 24-h milk quantities were identified as associated with high probability of full breastmilk at 36 weeks' post-menstrual age (PMA): on Day 4, ≥250 g (specificity 88%; positive predictive value 88%) and on Day 21 ≥650 g (specificity 88%; positive predictive value 91%). The following values were identified as associated with low probability of full breastmilk at 36 weeks' PMA: on Day 4 <50 g (sensitivity 92%; negative predictive value 72%) and on Day 21 <250 g (sensitivity 90%; negative predictive value 70%). Participants exceeding the high thresholds had 3-4 times increased likelihood of full breastmilk, whereas those below the low thresholds had 3-5 times lower likelihood. These thresholds have potential as targets for families, to provide individualised prognostic information and to help clinicians target more intensive lactation support.</p>","PeriodicalId":51112,"journal":{"name":"Maternal and Child Nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal and Child Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13719","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When infants cannot directly breastfeed after birth, mothers are advised to initiate lactation through mechanical expression. Families are recommended to target an expression volume of at least 500-750 mL by Day 14 after birth, as this is considered a 'critical window' to establish milk supply. This is challenging for many mothers after a very preterm birth. This article explores the relationship of early milk quantity and later full breastmilk feeding as a 'gold standard' outcome, using statistical techniques designed for diagnostic tests. A cohort of 132 mothers of infants born at 23 + 0 to 31 + 6 weeks' gestational age submitted expressing logs on Day 4, 14 and 21 after birth and provided later feeding outcome. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the following 24-h milk quantities were identified as associated with high probability of full breastmilk at 36 weeks' post-menstrual age (PMA): on Day 4, ≥250 g (specificity 88%; positive predictive value 88%) and on Day 21 ≥650 g (specificity 88%; positive predictive value 91%). The following values were identified as associated with low probability of full breastmilk at 36 weeks' PMA: on Day 4 <50 g (sensitivity 92%; negative predictive value 72%) and on Day 21 <250 g (sensitivity 90%; negative predictive value 70%). Participants exceeding the high thresholds had 3-4 times increased likelihood of full breastmilk, whereas those below the low thresholds had 3-5 times lower likelihood. These thresholds have potential as targets for families, to provide individualised prognostic information and to help clinicians target more intensive lactation support.

Abstract Image

早产儿早期挤奶量与日后全母乳喂养的关系:一项队列研究。
当婴儿出生后无法直接进行母乳喂养时,建议母亲通过机械挤奶来启动泌乳。建议家庭在婴儿出生后第 14 天前将泌乳量至少控制在 500-750 毫升,因为这是建立乳汁供应的 "关键窗口"。这对许多早产的母亲来说具有挑战性。本文采用专为诊断测试设计的统计技术,探讨了作为 "金标准 "结果的早期奶量与日后全母乳喂养之间的关系。132 位胎龄在 23+0 到 31+6 周之间的婴儿母亲在出生后第 4、14 和 21 天提交了表达日志,并提供了后来的喂养结果。通过接收器操作特征(ROC)分析,确定了以下 24 小时奶量与月龄后 36 周(PMA)婴儿吃饱母乳的高概率相关:第 4 天≥250 克(特异性 88%;阳性预测值 88%)和第 21 天≥650 克(特异性 88%;阳性预测值 91%)。以下数值与 36 周 PMA 时母乳饱满的低概率相关:第 4 天
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Maternal and Child Nutrition
Maternal and Child Nutrition 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Maternal & Child Nutrition addresses fundamental aspects of nutrition and its outcomes in women and their children, both in early and later life, and keeps its audience fully informed about new initiatives, the latest research findings and innovative ways of responding to changes in public attitudes and policy. Drawing from global sources, the Journal provides an invaluable source of up to date information for health professionals, academics and service users with interests in maternal and child nutrition. Its scope includes pre-conception, antenatal and postnatal maternal nutrition, women''s nutrition throughout their reproductive years, and fetal, neonatal, infant, child and adolescent nutrition and their effects throughout life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信