The cardioprotective effects of adenosine-induced cardioplegic arrest versus saline in aortic valve replacement patients: A randomized controlled trial.
Mikko S Mattila, Kati M Järvelä, Markku J Rantanen, Suvi Tuohinen, Kjell C Nikus, Jari O Laurikka
{"title":"The cardioprotective effects of adenosine-induced cardioplegic arrest versus saline in aortic valve replacement patients: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Mikko S Mattila, Kati M Järvelä, Markku J Rantanen, Suvi Tuohinen, Kjell C Nikus, Jari O Laurikka","doi":"10.1177/14574969241266716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Adenosine is a widely used potent cardioprotective drug, but the effect of an adenosine bolus in initial cardioplegia on cardioprotection in aortic valve replacement (AVR) patients has not been demonstrated. The aim of this double-blind randomized clinical trial was to compare intra-aortic adenosine bolus with saline on the postoperative myocardial function in patients undergoing AVR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Aortic valve stenosis patients scheduled for elective or urgent AVR surgery were randomized to receive either a 20 mg (4 mL) single dose of adenosine or a saline into the ascending aorta during the first cardioplegia infusion. The primary outcome was cardiac index (CI (L/min/m<sup>2</sup>) at four timepoints (before incision, after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), at 7 p.m. on the operation day, and at 6 a.m. the next morning). Secondary outcomes included left ventricular stroke work index, right ventricular stroke work index, and myocardial biomarkers at the same timepoints.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between November 2015 and March 2018, 45 patients were recruited, 23 in the adenosine group and 22 in the placebo group. The last follow-up date was 17 March 2018. There were no statistically significant differences in CI (mean differences with 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.09 L/min/m<sup>2</sup> at baseline (-0.20 to 0.38), -1.39 L/min/m<sup>2</sup> (-3.47 to 0.70) at post-CPB, -0.39 L/min/m<sup>2</sup> (-0.78 to 0.004) at 7 p.m., and -0.32 L/min/m<sup>2</sup> (-0.68 to 0.05) at 6 a.m., (<i>p</i> = 0.066)), right ventricular stroke work index, (<i>p</i> = 0.24), or cardiac biomarkers between the groups. Left ventricular stroke work index was lower in the adenosine group (-3.66 gm/m<sup>2</sup> (-11.13 to 3.81) at baseline, -17.42 gm/m<sup>2</sup> (-37.81 to 2.98) at post-CPB, -3.36 gm/m<sup>2</sup> (-11.10 to 4.38) at 7 p.m., and -3.77 gm/m<sup>2</sup> (-10.19 to 2.66) at 6 a.m. (<i>p</i> = 0.021)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There were no differences between 20 mg adenosine bolus and saline in the first cardioplegia infusion in CI improvement in AVR surgery for aortic valve stenosis.EudraCT number: 2014-001382-26.</p>","PeriodicalId":49566,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"273-281"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14574969241266716","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and aims: Adenosine is a widely used potent cardioprotective drug, but the effect of an adenosine bolus in initial cardioplegia on cardioprotection in aortic valve replacement (AVR) patients has not been demonstrated. The aim of this double-blind randomized clinical trial was to compare intra-aortic adenosine bolus with saline on the postoperative myocardial function in patients undergoing AVR.
Methods: Aortic valve stenosis patients scheduled for elective or urgent AVR surgery were randomized to receive either a 20 mg (4 mL) single dose of adenosine or a saline into the ascending aorta during the first cardioplegia infusion. The primary outcome was cardiac index (CI (L/min/m2) at four timepoints (before incision, after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), at 7 p.m. on the operation day, and at 6 a.m. the next morning). Secondary outcomes included left ventricular stroke work index, right ventricular stroke work index, and myocardial biomarkers at the same timepoints.
Results: Between November 2015 and March 2018, 45 patients were recruited, 23 in the adenosine group and 22 in the placebo group. The last follow-up date was 17 March 2018. There were no statistically significant differences in CI (mean differences with 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.09 L/min/m2 at baseline (-0.20 to 0.38), -1.39 L/min/m2 (-3.47 to 0.70) at post-CPB, -0.39 L/min/m2 (-0.78 to 0.004) at 7 p.m., and -0.32 L/min/m2 (-0.68 to 0.05) at 6 a.m., (p = 0.066)), right ventricular stroke work index, (p = 0.24), or cardiac biomarkers between the groups. Left ventricular stroke work index was lower in the adenosine group (-3.66 gm/m2 (-11.13 to 3.81) at baseline, -17.42 gm/m2 (-37.81 to 2.98) at post-CPB, -3.36 gm/m2 (-11.10 to 4.38) at 7 p.m., and -3.77 gm/m2 (-10.19 to 2.66) at 6 a.m. (p = 0.021)).
Conclusions: There were no differences between 20 mg adenosine bolus and saline in the first cardioplegia infusion in CI improvement in AVR surgery for aortic valve stenosis.EudraCT number: 2014-001382-26.
期刊介绍：
The Scandinavian Journal of Surgery (SJS) is the official peer reviewed journal of the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society. It publishes original and review articles from all surgical fields and specialties to reflect the interests of our diverse and international readership that consists of surgeons from all specialties and continents.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
