Social robots as skilled ignorant peers for supporting learning.

IF 2.9 Q2 ROBOTICS
Frontiers in Robotics and AI Pub Date : 2024-08-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frobt.2024.1385780
Jauwairia Nasir, Barbara Bruno, Pierre Dillenbourg
{"title":"Social robots as skilled ignorant peers for supporting learning.","authors":"Jauwairia Nasir, Barbara Bruno, Pierre Dillenbourg","doi":"10.3389/frobt.2024.1385780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When designing social robots for educational settings, there is often an emphasis on domain knowledge. This presents challenges: 1) Either robots must autonomously acquire domain knowledge, a currently unsolved problem in HRI, or 2) the designers provide this knowledge implying re-programming the robot for new contexts. Recent research explores alternative, relatively easier to port, knowledge areas like student rapport, engagement, and synchrony though these constructs are typically treated as the ultimate goals, when the final goal should be students' learning. Our aim is to propose a shift in how engagement is considered, aligning it naturally with learning. We introduce the notion of a skilled ignorant peer robot: a robot peer that has little to no domain knowledge but possesses knowledge of student behaviours conducive to learning, i.e., behaviours indicative of productive engagement as extracted from student behavioral profiles. We formally investigate how such a robot's interventions manipulate the children's engagement conducive to learning. Specifically, we evaluate two versions of the proposed robot, namely, Harry and Hermione, in a user study with 136 students where each version differs in terms of the intervention strategy. Harry focuses on which suggestions to intervene with from a pool of communication, exploration, and reflection inducing suggestions, while Hermione also carefully considers when and why to intervene. While the teams interacting with Harry have higher productive engagement correlated to learning, this engagement is not affected by the robot's intervention scheme. In contrast, Hermione's well-timed interventions, deemed more useful, correlate with productive engagement though engagement is not correlated to learning. These results highlight the potential of a social educational robot as a skilled ignorant peer and stress the importance of precisely timing the robot interventions in a learning environment to be able to manipulate moderating variable of interest such as productive engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":47597,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Robotics and AI","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11375219/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Robotics and AI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2024.1385780","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ROBOTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When designing social robots for educational settings, there is often an emphasis on domain knowledge. This presents challenges: 1) Either robots must autonomously acquire domain knowledge, a currently unsolved problem in HRI, or 2) the designers provide this knowledge implying re-programming the robot for new contexts. Recent research explores alternative, relatively easier to port, knowledge areas like student rapport, engagement, and synchrony though these constructs are typically treated as the ultimate goals, when the final goal should be students' learning. Our aim is to propose a shift in how engagement is considered, aligning it naturally with learning. We introduce the notion of a skilled ignorant peer robot: a robot peer that has little to no domain knowledge but possesses knowledge of student behaviours conducive to learning, i.e., behaviours indicative of productive engagement as extracted from student behavioral profiles. We formally investigate how such a robot's interventions manipulate the children's engagement conducive to learning. Specifically, we evaluate two versions of the proposed robot, namely, Harry and Hermione, in a user study with 136 students where each version differs in terms of the intervention strategy. Harry focuses on which suggestions to intervene with from a pool of communication, exploration, and reflection inducing suggestions, while Hermione also carefully considers when and why to intervene. While the teams interacting with Harry have higher productive engagement correlated to learning, this engagement is not affected by the robot's intervention scheme. In contrast, Hermione's well-timed interventions, deemed more useful, correlate with productive engagement though engagement is not correlated to learning. These results highlight the potential of a social educational robot as a skilled ignorant peer and stress the importance of precisely timing the robot interventions in a learning environment to be able to manipulate moderating variable of interest such as productive engagement.

社交机器人是支持学习的熟练无知的同伴。
在为教育环境设计社交机器人时,通常会强调领域知识。这就带来了挑战:1) 机器人必须自主获取领域知识(这是目前人机交互领域尚未解决的问题),或者 2) 由设计者提供这些知识,这意味着需要针对新的情境对机器人进行重新编程。最近的研究探索了其他相对更容易移植的知识领域,如学生关系、参与度和同步性,但这些结构通常被视为最终目标,而最终目标应该是学生的学习。我们的目的是建议转变对参与的考虑方式,使其与学习自然地结合起来。我们引入了 "熟练的无知同伴机器人 "的概念:这种机器人同伴几乎不具备任何领域知识,但却掌握了有利于学习的学生行为知识,即从学生行为档案中提取的表明有成效参与的行为。我们正式研究了这种机器人的干预是如何操纵儿童的参与以促进学习的。具体来说,我们在对 136 名学生进行的用户研究中评估了两个版本的机器人,即 "哈利 "和 "赫敏"。哈里 "侧重于从交流、探索和反思诱导建议库中选择干预建议,而 "赫敏 "也会仔细考虑干预的时间和原因。虽然与哈里互动的团队具有更高的与学习相关的生产参与度,但这种参与度并不受机器人干预方案的影响。与此相反,赫敏适时的干预被认为更有用,与生产性参与相关,但参与与学习无关。这些结果凸显了社交教育机器人作为熟练的无知同伴的潜力,并强调了在学习环境中准确把握机器人干预时机的重要性,以便能够操纵生产性参与等相关调节变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
355
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Robotics and AI publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research covering all theory and applications of robotics, technology, and artificial intelligence, from biomedical to space robotics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信