Morphologic Differences between Normocephalic and Scaphocephalic Sagittal Craniosynostosis.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Plastic and reconstructive surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000011712
Alexander Velazquez, Michael S Lebhar, Johnny Yang, Martin McCandless, David Pitre, Mason Shiflett, Kristen Weaver, Todd Nichols, Ian C Hoppe, Laura S Humphries
{"title":"Morphologic Differences between Normocephalic and Scaphocephalic Sagittal Craniosynostosis.","authors":"Alexander Velazquez, Michael S Lebhar, Johnny Yang, Martin McCandless, David Pitre, Mason Shiflett, Kristen Weaver, Todd Nichols, Ian C Hoppe, Laura S Humphries","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000011712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nonsyndromic single-suture sagittal craniosynostosis presentation spans scaphocephalic and normocephalic head shapes. The authors studied craniometric differences between scaphocephalic and normocephalic groups with sagittal synostosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Head computed tomography scans of 40 patients with sagittal synostosis (20 with scaphocephaly and 20 with normocephaly) and age- and sex-matched controls were analyzed, including cranial base angles, distances from midline, and intracranial volumes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cranial index was significantly decreased in index groups compared with controls ( P < 0.001). Right external acoustic meatus angle was significantly larger in patients with scaphocephaly ( P < 0.001) and left external acoustic meatus angle was significantly smaller in patients with normocephaly ( P = 0.002) when compared with controls. Midline angular analysis showed that bifrontal angle was significantly smaller among patients with scaphocephaly versus controls ( P = 0.026). Cranial base distances from midline were longer to the right and left internal acoustic meatus and shorter to the euryon-to-zygomaticofrontal suture for both groups of patients versus their controls ( P < 0.05). Scaphocephalic patients had a larger anterior cranial volume ratio (18% versus 13%; P < 0.001) and normocephalic patients had a larger posterior volume ratio (42% versus 33%; P < 0.001) than controls. Scaphocephalic patients had larger anterior volume ratios than normocephalic patients (1.66 versus 1.16; P = 0.025), but smaller posterior compartment volume ratios (0.90 versus 1.53; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rightward asymmetries of the linear and angle cranial base measurements existed in both index groups. Intracranial volume distribution lies anteriorly in patients with scaphocephaly but posteriorly in patients with normocephaly. These data show craniometric evidence that although normocephalic and scaphocephalic patients share the diagnosis of sagittal synostosis, they are morphometrically different from each other and from controls.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"852-863"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011712","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nonsyndromic single-suture sagittal craniosynostosis presentation spans scaphocephalic and normocephalic head shapes. The authors studied craniometric differences between scaphocephalic and normocephalic groups with sagittal synostosis.

Methods: Head computed tomography scans of 40 patients with sagittal synostosis (20 with scaphocephaly and 20 with normocephaly) and age- and sex-matched controls were analyzed, including cranial base angles, distances from midline, and intracranial volumes.

Results: Cranial index was significantly decreased in index groups compared with controls ( P < 0.001). Right external acoustic meatus angle was significantly larger in patients with scaphocephaly ( P < 0.001) and left external acoustic meatus angle was significantly smaller in patients with normocephaly ( P = 0.002) when compared with controls. Midline angular analysis showed that bifrontal angle was significantly smaller among patients with scaphocephaly versus controls ( P = 0.026). Cranial base distances from midline were longer to the right and left internal acoustic meatus and shorter to the euryon-to-zygomaticofrontal suture for both groups of patients versus their controls ( P < 0.05). Scaphocephalic patients had a larger anterior cranial volume ratio (18% versus 13%; P < 0.001) and normocephalic patients had a larger posterior volume ratio (42% versus 33%; P < 0.001) than controls. Scaphocephalic patients had larger anterior volume ratios than normocephalic patients (1.66 versus 1.16; P = 0.025), but smaller posterior compartment volume ratios (0.90 versus 1.53; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Rightward asymmetries of the linear and angle cranial base measurements existed in both index groups. Intracranial volume distribution lies anteriorly in patients with scaphocephaly but posteriorly in patients with normocephaly. These data show craniometric evidence that although normocephalic and scaphocephalic patients share the diagnosis of sagittal synostosis, they are morphometrically different from each other and from controls.

"非综合畸形单缝矢状颅畸形正常头和双侧头患者的头颅测量和体积分析"。
目的:非综合征单缝矢状颅畸形的表现跨越了双侧头和正常头两种头型。方法:对 20 名双侧头颅和 20 名正常头颅矢状突触症患者及其年龄和性别匹配的对照组的头颅 CT 扫描结果进行分析,包括颅底角、距中线距离和颅内容积:结果:与对照组相比,指数组的颅骨指数明显下降(P两个指数组的颅底线性和角度测量结果均向右不对称。颅内容积分布在双侧颅患者中位于前方,而在正常颅患者中位于后方。这些数据表明,尽管正常头型和肩胛头型患者都被诊断为 "矢状突眼",但他们在形态上却与对照组不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
1436
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信