Alexander Velazquez, Michael S Lebhar, Johnny Yang, Martin McCandless, David Pitre, Mason Shiflett, Kristen Weaver, Todd Nichols, Ian C Hoppe, Laura S Humphries
{"title":"Morphologic Differences between Normocephalic and Scaphocephalic Sagittal Craniosynostosis.","authors":"Alexander Velazquez, Michael S Lebhar, Johnny Yang, Martin McCandless, David Pitre, Mason Shiflett, Kristen Weaver, Todd Nichols, Ian C Hoppe, Laura S Humphries","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000011712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nonsyndromic single-suture sagittal craniosynostosis presentation spans scaphocephalic and normocephalic head shapes. The authors studied craniometric differences between scaphocephalic and normocephalic groups with sagittal synostosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Head computed tomography scans of 40 patients with sagittal synostosis (20 with scaphocephaly and 20 with normocephaly) and age- and sex-matched controls were analyzed, including cranial base angles, distances from midline, and intracranial volumes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cranial index was significantly decreased in index groups compared with controls ( P < 0.001). Right external acoustic meatus angle was significantly larger in patients with scaphocephaly ( P < 0.001) and left external acoustic meatus angle was significantly smaller in patients with normocephaly ( P = 0.002) when compared with controls. Midline angular analysis showed that bifrontal angle was significantly smaller among patients with scaphocephaly versus controls ( P = 0.026). Cranial base distances from midline were longer to the right and left internal acoustic meatus and shorter to the euryon-to-zygomaticofrontal suture for both groups of patients versus their controls ( P < 0.05). Scaphocephalic patients had a larger anterior cranial volume ratio (18% versus 13%; P < 0.001) and normocephalic patients had a larger posterior volume ratio (42% versus 33%; P < 0.001) than controls. Scaphocephalic patients had larger anterior volume ratios than normocephalic patients (1.66 versus 1.16; P = 0.025), but smaller posterior compartment volume ratios (0.90 versus 1.53; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rightward asymmetries of the linear and angle cranial base measurements existed in both index groups. Intracranial volume distribution lies anteriorly in patients with scaphocephaly but posteriorly in patients with normocephaly. These data show craniometric evidence that although normocephalic and scaphocephalic patients share the diagnosis of sagittal synostosis, they are morphometrically different from each other and from controls.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"852-863"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011712","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Nonsyndromic single-suture sagittal craniosynostosis presentation spans scaphocephalic and normocephalic head shapes. The authors studied craniometric differences between scaphocephalic and normocephalic groups with sagittal synostosis.
Methods: Head computed tomography scans of 40 patients with sagittal synostosis (20 with scaphocephaly and 20 with normocephaly) and age- and sex-matched controls were analyzed, including cranial base angles, distances from midline, and intracranial volumes.
Results: Cranial index was significantly decreased in index groups compared with controls ( P < 0.001). Right external acoustic meatus angle was significantly larger in patients with scaphocephaly ( P < 0.001) and left external acoustic meatus angle was significantly smaller in patients with normocephaly ( P = 0.002) when compared with controls. Midline angular analysis showed that bifrontal angle was significantly smaller among patients with scaphocephaly versus controls ( P = 0.026). Cranial base distances from midline were longer to the right and left internal acoustic meatus and shorter to the euryon-to-zygomaticofrontal suture for both groups of patients versus their controls ( P < 0.05). Scaphocephalic patients had a larger anterior cranial volume ratio (18% versus 13%; P < 0.001) and normocephalic patients had a larger posterior volume ratio (42% versus 33%; P < 0.001) than controls. Scaphocephalic patients had larger anterior volume ratios than normocephalic patients (1.66 versus 1.16; P = 0.025), but smaller posterior compartment volume ratios (0.90 versus 1.53; P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Rightward asymmetries of the linear and angle cranial base measurements existed in both index groups. Intracranial volume distribution lies anteriorly in patients with scaphocephaly but posteriorly in patients with normocephaly. These data show craniometric evidence that although normocephalic and scaphocephalic patients share the diagnosis of sagittal synostosis, they are morphometrically different from each other and from controls.
期刊介绍:
For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.