Effectiveness of Fosphenytoin and Levetiracetam to Prevent Posttraumatic Seizures in Young Children with Accidental or Abusive Traumatic Brain Injury.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Caitlin R McNamara, Cesar I Menchaca, Taylor J Abel, Christopher M Horvat, Rachel P Berger, Ericka L Fink, Patrick M Kochanek, Dennis W Simon
{"title":"Effectiveness of Fosphenytoin and Levetiracetam to Prevent Posttraumatic Seizures in Young Children with Accidental or Abusive Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Caitlin R McNamara, Cesar I Menchaca, Taylor J Abel, Christopher M Horvat, Rachel P Berger, Ericka L Fink, Patrick M Kochanek, Dennis W Simon","doi":"10.1007/s12028-024-02093-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Seizures occur frequently in pediatric patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), particularly abusive head trauma (AHT). There are limited data on the effectiveness of fosphenytoin and levetiracetam to prevent posttraumatic seizures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective single center cohort study of children < 3 years old admitted with mild [Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score 13-15], moderate (GCS 9-12), and severe (GCS 3-8) TBI at a level I trauma center from 2011 to 2021. Antiseizure medications were used at the discretion of the treating physicians. Nonparametric tests were used to compare antiseizure medication prophylaxis and TBI etiology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 717 patients (263 with AHT, 454 with accidental TBI) were included, of whom 135 (19%) received fosphenytoin, 152 (21%) received levetiracetam, and 430 (60%) did not receive any seizure prophylaxis. Over the study period, the use of fosphenytoin prophylaxis decreased (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.67, p = 0.004), whereas the use of levetiracetam increased (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.51, p = 0.008). Additionally, the occurrence of early posttraumatic seizures decreased (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.58, p = 0.006). Children with AHT were more likely to receive any seizure prophylaxis than those with accidental TBI (52% vs. 27%; p < 0.001) and were more likely to have ≥ 1 seizure during hospitalization (22% vs. 4%; p < 0.001). Among children who received seizure prophylaxis, those who received fosphenytoin had a higher occurrence of seizures than those who received levetiracetam (33% vs.18%; p = 0.004). After controlling for age, admission year, TBI mechanism, and severity of injury, we observed no differences in seizure occurrence between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In children < 3 years old with TBI, no differences were observed in occurrence of seizures between patients who received fosphenytoin and patients who received levetiracetam prophylaxis after controlling for patient factors including severity of injury. Levetiracetam may be an equally effective alternative to fosphenytoin for seizure prophylaxis for early posttraumatic seizure prevention in this age group.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-024-02093-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Seizures occur frequently in pediatric patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), particularly abusive head trauma (AHT). There are limited data on the effectiveness of fosphenytoin and levetiracetam to prevent posttraumatic seizures.

Methods: We performed a retrospective single center cohort study of children < 3 years old admitted with mild [Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score 13-15], moderate (GCS 9-12), and severe (GCS 3-8) TBI at a level I trauma center from 2011 to 2021. Antiseizure medications were used at the discretion of the treating physicians. Nonparametric tests were used to compare antiseizure medication prophylaxis and TBI etiology.

Results: A total of 717 patients (263 with AHT, 454 with accidental TBI) were included, of whom 135 (19%) received fosphenytoin, 152 (21%) received levetiracetam, and 430 (60%) did not receive any seizure prophylaxis. Over the study period, the use of fosphenytoin prophylaxis decreased (R2 = 0.67, p = 0.004), whereas the use of levetiracetam increased (R2 = 0.51, p = 0.008). Additionally, the occurrence of early posttraumatic seizures decreased (R2 = 0.58, p = 0.006). Children with AHT were more likely to receive any seizure prophylaxis than those with accidental TBI (52% vs. 27%; p < 0.001) and were more likely to have ≥ 1 seizure during hospitalization (22% vs. 4%; p < 0.001). Among children who received seizure prophylaxis, those who received fosphenytoin had a higher occurrence of seizures than those who received levetiracetam (33% vs.18%; p = 0.004). After controlling for age, admission year, TBI mechanism, and severity of injury, we observed no differences in seizure occurrence between groups.

Conclusions: In children < 3 years old with TBI, no differences were observed in occurrence of seizures between patients who received fosphenytoin and patients who received levetiracetam prophylaxis after controlling for patient factors including severity of injury. Levetiracetam may be an equally effective alternative to fosphenytoin for seizure prophylaxis for early posttraumatic seizure prevention in this age group.

Abstract Image

磷苯妥英和左乙拉西坦预防意外或虐待性创伤性脑损伤幼儿创伤后癫痫发作的有效性。
背景:创伤性脑损伤(TBI),尤其是虐待性头部创伤(AHT)的儿童患者经常出现癫痫发作。有关磷苯妥英和左乙拉西坦预防创伤后癫痫发作效果的数据有限:我们对儿童进行了一项回顾性单中心队列研究:共纳入 717 名患者(263 名 AHT 患者,454 名意外创伤性脑损伤患者),其中 135 人(19%)接受了磷苯妥英治疗,152 人(21%)接受了左乙拉西坦治疗,430 人(60%)未接受任何癫痫发作预防治疗。在研究期间,使用磷苯妥英预防的人数减少了(R2 = 0.67,p = 0.004),而使用左乙拉西坦的人数增加了(R2 = 0.51,p = 0.008)。此外,早期创伤后癫痫发作的发生率也有所下降(R2 = 0.58,p = 0.006)。与意外创伤性脑损伤患儿相比,AHT 患儿更有可能接受任何癫痫发作预防治疗(52% 对 27%;P 结论:AHT 患儿的癫痫发作预防治疗率高于意外创伤性脑损伤患儿:儿童
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurocritical Care
Neurocritical Care 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.60%
发文量
221
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信