Evaluation of Socioeconomic and Racial/Ethnic Disparities in All-Cause Mortality in Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer.

IF 14.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Scott Henderson, Mark Duggan, Chun Chao, Robert Cooper
{"title":"Evaluation of Socioeconomic and Racial/Ethnic Disparities in All-Cause Mortality in Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer.","authors":"Scott Henderson, Mark Duggan, Chun Chao, Robert Cooper","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with cancer have historically been understudied. Few studies have examined survival disparities associated with racial/ethnic and socioeconomic status (SES) and do not account for the influence of insurance status and access to care. We evaluated the association of SES and race/ethnicity with overall mortality for AYA patients who were members of an integrated health system with relatively equal access to care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>AYA patients diagnosed with the 15 most common cancer types during 2010 through 2018 at Kaiser Permanente Southern California were included. Neighborhood Deprivation Index (NDI) quartile (Q1: least deprived; Q4: most deprived) was used as a measure of SES. Mortality rate per 1,000 person-years was calculated for each racial/ethnic and NDI subgroup. Multivariable Cox model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause mortality adjusting for sex, age and stage at diagnosis, cancer type, race/ethnicity, and NDI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data for 6,379 patients were tracked for a maximum of 10 years. Crude mortality rates were higher among non-White racial/ethnic patients compared with non-Hispanic (NH)-White patients. In the Cox model, Hispanic (HR, 1.31; P=.004) and NH-Black (HR, 1.34; P=.05) patients experienced significantly higher all-cause mortality risk compared with NH-White patients. Patients from more deprived neighborhoods had higher mortality risk. In the Cox model, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between Q1 and Q2 through Q4 (Q2: HR, 0.88; P=.26, Q3: HR, 0.94; P=.56, and Q4: HR, 0.95; P=.70).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For AYAs with cancer with similar access to care, Hispanic and NH-Black patients have higher risk of all-cause mortality than NH-White patients, whereas no significant SES-associated survival disparities were observed. These findings warrant further investigation, awareness, and intervention to address inequities in cancer care among vulnerable populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":"22 7","pages":"447-453"},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2024.7027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with cancer have historically been understudied. Few studies have examined survival disparities associated with racial/ethnic and socioeconomic status (SES) and do not account for the influence of insurance status and access to care. We evaluated the association of SES and race/ethnicity with overall mortality for AYA patients who were members of an integrated health system with relatively equal access to care.

Methods: AYA patients diagnosed with the 15 most common cancer types during 2010 through 2018 at Kaiser Permanente Southern California were included. Neighborhood Deprivation Index (NDI) quartile (Q1: least deprived; Q4: most deprived) was used as a measure of SES. Mortality rate per 1,000 person-years was calculated for each racial/ethnic and NDI subgroup. Multivariable Cox model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause mortality adjusting for sex, age and stage at diagnosis, cancer type, race/ethnicity, and NDI.

Results: Data for 6,379 patients were tracked for a maximum of 10 years. Crude mortality rates were higher among non-White racial/ethnic patients compared with non-Hispanic (NH)-White patients. In the Cox model, Hispanic (HR, 1.31; P=.004) and NH-Black (HR, 1.34; P=.05) patients experienced significantly higher all-cause mortality risk compared with NH-White patients. Patients from more deprived neighborhoods had higher mortality risk. In the Cox model, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between Q1 and Q2 through Q4 (Q2: HR, 0.88; P=.26, Q3: HR, 0.94; P=.56, and Q4: HR, 0.95; P=.70).

Conclusions: For AYAs with cancer with similar access to care, Hispanic and NH-Black patients have higher risk of all-cause mortality than NH-White patients, whereas no significant SES-associated survival disparities were observed. These findings warrant further investigation, awareness, and intervention to address inequities in cancer care among vulnerable populations.

青少年和年轻成人癌症患者全因死亡率的社会经济和种族/族裔差异评估》(Evaluation of Socioeconomic and Racial/Ethnic Disparities in All-Cause Mortality in Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer)。
背景:青少年和年轻成人(AYA)癌症患者的研究历来不足。很少有研究探讨了与种族/民族和社会经济地位(SES)相关的生存差异,也没有考虑保险状况和获得医疗服务的影响。我们评估了社会经济地位和种族/人种与综合医疗系统中获得相对平等医疗服务的青少年患者总死亡率的关系:方法:纳入了 2010 年至 2018 年期间在南加州凯泽医疗集团(Kaiser Permanente Southern California)确诊为 15 种最常见癌症类型的青壮年患者。邻里贫困指数(NDI)四分位数(Q1:最贫困;Q4:最贫困)被用来衡量社会经济地位。计算了每个种族/民族和 NDI 分组的每千人年死亡率。采用多变量 Cox 模型估算全因死亡率的危险比(HRs),并对性别、年龄和诊断分期、癌症类型、种族/民族和 NDI 进行调整:对 6379 名患者的数据进行了长达 10 年的追踪。与非西班牙裔(NH)白人患者相比,非白人种族/族裔患者的粗死亡率更高。在 Cox 模型中,西班牙裔(HR,1.31;P=.004)和非西班牙裔黑人(HR,1.34;P=.05)患者的全因死亡风险明显高于非西班牙裔白人患者。来自更贫困社区的患者的死亡风险更高。在 Cox 模型中,第一季度和第二至第四季度的全因死亡率没有显著差异(第二季度:HR,0.88;P=.26;第三季度:HR,0.94;P=.56;第四季度:HR,0.95;P=.70):结论:在获得医疗服务机会相似的青少年癌症患者中,西班牙裔和国家卫生机构黑人患者的全因死亡风险高于国家卫生机构白人患者,但未观察到与社会经济地位相关的显著生存差异。这些发现值得进一步调查、认识和干预,以解决弱势人群在癌症治疗中的不平等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
388
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JNCCN—Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network is a peer-reviewed medical journal read by over 25,000 oncologists and cancer care professionals nationwide. This indexed publication delivers the latest insights into best clinical practices, oncology health services research, and translational medicine. Notably, JNCCN provides updates on the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology® (NCCN Guidelines®), review articles elaborating on guideline recommendations, health services research, and case reports that spotlight molecular insights in patient care. Guided by its vision, JNCCN seeks to advance the mission of NCCN by serving as the primary resource for information on NCCN Guidelines®, innovation in translational medicine, and scientific studies related to oncology health services research. This encompasses quality care and value, bioethics, comparative and cost effectiveness, public policy, and interventional research on supportive care and survivorship. JNCCN boasts indexing by prominent databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Chemical Abstracts, Embase, EmCare, and Scopus, reinforcing its standing as a reputable source for comprehensive information in the field of oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信