Total abdominal colectomy versus diverting loop ileostomy with colonic lavage for fulminant clostridium difficile colitis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Almoutuz Aljaafreh, Moussa Hojeij, Karim Ataya, Neha Patel, Amir Rabih Al Ayoubi, Dalida El Khatib, Yusuf Ahmed, Hussein Nassar, Hussein El Bourji
{"title":"Total abdominal colectomy versus diverting loop ileostomy with colonic lavage for fulminant clostridium difficile colitis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes.","authors":"Almoutuz Aljaafreh, Moussa Hojeij, Karim Ataya, Neha Patel, Amir Rabih Al Ayoubi, Dalida El Khatib, Yusuf Ahmed, Hussein Nassar, Hussein El Bourji","doi":"10.1007/s00423-024-03458-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Diverting Loop Ileostomy (DLI) with intraoperative colonic lavage has emerged as a potential alternative to Total Abdominal Colectomy (TAC) for treating Fulminant Clostridium Difficile Colitis (FCDC). This study aims to provide an updated review comparing DLI with TAC in managing FCDC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Embase to identify retrospective and prospective studies comparing DLI with TAC for fulminant CDC treatment. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate postoperative mortality rates and complications using R Studio version 4.4.1, calculating odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals via the Mantel-Haenszel method. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochrane Q test and I<sup>2</sup> statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search yielded 228 relevant citations, of which 7 studies with a total of 7,048 patients were included. Of these, 1,728 underwent DLI. The mean age was 63.33 years in the DLI group and 65.74 years in the TAC group. Compared to TAC, DLI had significantly lower postoperative mortality (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.62-0.90; P = 0.002; I<sup>2</sup> = 34%). Trial sequential analysis for postoperative mortality rates showed the benefit of DLI with a sufficiently powered sample. The DLI group also had a significantly higher rate of ostomy reversal (OR 5.68; 95% CI 2.35-13.72; P < 0.001; I<sup>2</sup> = 36%). Postoperative complications, such as thromboembolic events, surgical site infections, urinary tract infections, renal failure, and pneumonia, were not significantly different.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DLI shows a lower postoperative mortality rate and higher ostomy reversal rate than TAC, suggesting it as a potential organ-preserving, minimally invasive alternative. Further high-quality studies and trials are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-024-03458-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Diverting Loop Ileostomy (DLI) with intraoperative colonic lavage has emerged as a potential alternative to Total Abdominal Colectomy (TAC) for treating Fulminant Clostridium Difficile Colitis (FCDC). This study aims to provide an updated review comparing DLI with TAC in managing FCDC.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Embase to identify retrospective and prospective studies comparing DLI with TAC for fulminant CDC treatment. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate postoperative mortality rates and complications using R Studio version 4.4.1, calculating odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals via the Mantel-Haenszel method. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochrane Q test and I2 statistics.

Results: Our search yielded 228 relevant citations, of which 7 studies with a total of 7,048 patients were included. Of these, 1,728 underwent DLI. The mean age was 63.33 years in the DLI group and 65.74 years in the TAC group. Compared to TAC, DLI had significantly lower postoperative mortality (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.62-0.90; P = 0.002; I2 = 34%). Trial sequential analysis for postoperative mortality rates showed the benefit of DLI with a sufficiently powered sample. The DLI group also had a significantly higher rate of ostomy reversal (OR 5.68; 95% CI 2.35-13.72; P < 0.001; I2 = 36%). Postoperative complications, such as thromboembolic events, surgical site infections, urinary tract infections, renal failure, and pneumonia, were not significantly different.

Conclusion: DLI shows a lower postoperative mortality rate and higher ostomy reversal rate than TAC, suggesting it as a potential organ-preserving, minimally invasive alternative. Further high-quality studies and trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Abstract Image

治疗暴发性艰难梭菌性结肠炎的全腹结肠切除术与转流环回肠造口术和结肠灌洗术:最新的系统综述和荟萃分析结果。
目的:在治疗暴发性二价梭状芽孢杆菌结肠炎(FCDC)时,结合术中结肠灌洗的憩室回肠造口术(DLI)已成为全腹结肠切除术(TAC)的潜在替代方案。本研究旨在提供最新综述,比较 DLI 与 TAC 在治疗 FCDC 方面的效果:方法:使用PubMed、Scopus和Embase进行了系统性文献检索,以确定比较DLI与TAC治疗暴发性CDC的回顾性和前瞻性研究。使用R Studio 4.4.1版进行荟萃分析,评估术后死亡率和并发症,通过Mantel-Haenszel方法计算几率比(OR)和95%置信区间。使用 Cochrane Q 检验和 I2 统计量评估异质性:我们的搜索共获得 228 条相关引文,其中纳入了 7 项研究,共计 7048 名患者。其中,1,728 名患者接受了 DLI 治疗。DLI组患者的平均年龄为63.33岁,TAC组患者的平均年龄为65.74岁。与TAC相比,DLI的术后死亡率明显降低(OR 0.75;95% CI 0.62-0.90;P = 0.002;I2 = 34%)。对术后死亡率进行的试验序列分析表明,在有足够样本的情况下,DLI 有益。DLI 组的造口翻转率也明显更高(OR 5.68;95% CI 2.35-13.72;P 2 = 36%)。术后并发症,如血栓栓塞事件、手术部位感染、尿路感染、肾功能衰竭和肺炎,没有明显差异:结论:与TAC相比,DLI的术后死亡率更低,造口翻转率更高,是一种潜在的保留器官的微创替代方法。需要进一步的高质量研究和试验来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信