Derivation, external and clinical validation of a deep learning approach for detecting intracranial hypertension

IF 12.4 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Faris Gulamali, Pushkala Jayaraman, Ashwin S. Sawant, Jacob Desman, Benjamin Fox, Annette Chang, Brian Y. Soong, Naveen Arivazagan, Alexandra S. Reynolds, Son Q. Duong, Akhil Vaid, Patricia Kovatch, Robert Freeman, Ira S. Hofer, Ankit Sakhuja, Neha S. Dangayach, David S. Reich, Alexander W. Charney, Girish N. Nadkarni
{"title":"Derivation, external and clinical validation of a deep learning approach for detecting intracranial hypertension","authors":"Faris Gulamali, Pushkala Jayaraman, Ashwin S. Sawant, Jacob Desman, Benjamin Fox, Annette Chang, Brian Y. Soong, Naveen Arivazagan, Alexandra S. Reynolds, Son Q. Duong, Akhil Vaid, Patricia Kovatch, Robert Freeman, Ira S. Hofer, Ankit Sakhuja, Neha S. Dangayach, David S. Reich, Alexander W. Charney, Girish N. Nadkarni","doi":"10.1038/s41746-024-01227-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increased intracranial pressure (ICP) ≥15 mmHg is associated with adverse neurological outcomes, but needs invasive intracranial monitoring. Using the publicly available MIMIC-III Waveform Database (2000–2013) from Boston, we developed an artificial intelligence-derived biomarker for elevated ICP (aICP) for adult patients. aICP uses routinely collected extracranial waveform data as input, reducing the need for invasive monitoring. We externally validated aICP with an independent dataset from the Mount Sinai Hospital (2020–2022) in New York City. The AUROC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity on the external validation dataset were 0.80 (95% CI, 0.80–0.80), 73.8% (95% CI, 72.0–75.6%), 73.5% (95% CI 72.5–74.5%), and 73.0% (95% CI, 72.0–74.0%), respectively. We also present an exploratory analysis showing aICP predictions are associated with clinical phenotypes. A ten-percentile increment was associated with brain malignancy (OR = 1.68; 95% CI, 1.09-2.60), intracerebral hemorrhage (OR = 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07–1.32), and craniotomy (OR = 1.43; 95% CI, 1.12–1.84; P < 0.05 for all).","PeriodicalId":19349,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Digital Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-024-01227-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Digital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-024-01227-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Increased intracranial pressure (ICP) ≥15 mmHg is associated with adverse neurological outcomes, but needs invasive intracranial monitoring. Using the publicly available MIMIC-III Waveform Database (2000–2013) from Boston, we developed an artificial intelligence-derived biomarker for elevated ICP (aICP) for adult patients. aICP uses routinely collected extracranial waveform data as input, reducing the need for invasive monitoring. We externally validated aICP with an independent dataset from the Mount Sinai Hospital (2020–2022) in New York City. The AUROC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity on the external validation dataset were 0.80 (95% CI, 0.80–0.80), 73.8% (95% CI, 72.0–75.6%), 73.5% (95% CI 72.5–74.5%), and 73.0% (95% CI, 72.0–74.0%), respectively. We also present an exploratory analysis showing aICP predictions are associated with clinical phenotypes. A ten-percentile increment was associated with brain malignancy (OR = 1.68; 95% CI, 1.09-2.60), intracerebral hemorrhage (OR = 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07–1.32), and craniotomy (OR = 1.43; 95% CI, 1.12–1.84; P < 0.05 for all).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

用于检测颅内高压的深度学习方法的衍生、外部和临床验证
颅内压(ICP)升高≥15 mmHg 与不良的神经系统预后有关,但需要进行有创颅内监测。利用波士顿公开的 MIMIC-III 波形数据库(2000-2013 年),我们为成年患者开发了一种人工智能衍生的 ICP 升高生物标志物(aICP)。我们利用纽约市西奈山医院(2020-2022 年)的独立数据集对 aICP 进行了外部验证。外部验证数据集的 AUROC、准确性、灵敏度和特异性分别为 0.80(95% CI,0.80-0.80)、73.8%(95% CI,72.0-75.6%)、73.5%(95% CI,72.5-74.5%)和 73.0%(95% CI,72.0-74.0%)。我们还进行了一项探索性分析,结果显示 aICP 预测与临床表型有关。10个百分点的增量与脑恶性肿瘤(OR = 1.68; 95% CI, 1.09-2.60)、脑内出血(OR = 1.18; 95% CI, 1.07-1.32)和开颅手术(OR = 1.43; 95% CI, 1.12-1.84;所有P均为0.05)相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
170
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics. The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信