A Realist Evaluation of Mechanisms and Contexts for Facilitating the Implementation of Supported Self-Management in Community Stroke Care (The IMPETUS Study)

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Lisa Kidd, Julie Brown, Helen Mason, Terry Quinn, Katie I. Gallacher, Fiona Jones, Rebecca Fisher, Therese Lebedis, Mark Barber, Katrina Brennan, Betty Gilmour, Colin Fraser, Patricia Mooney, Audrey Taggart
{"title":"A Realist Evaluation of Mechanisms and Contexts for Facilitating the Implementation of Supported Self-Management in Community Stroke Care (The IMPETUS Study)","authors":"Lisa Kidd,&nbsp;Julie Brown,&nbsp;Helen Mason,&nbsp;Terry Quinn,&nbsp;Katie I. Gallacher,&nbsp;Fiona Jones,&nbsp;Rebecca Fisher,&nbsp;Therese Lebedis,&nbsp;Mark Barber,&nbsp;Katrina Brennan,&nbsp;Betty Gilmour,&nbsp;Colin Fraser,&nbsp;Patricia Mooney,&nbsp;Audrey Taggart","doi":"10.1155/2024/9198768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>The past decade has seen a growing recognition of the role of supported self-management in the provision of long-term care and support for stroke survivors in primary and community care. However, its implementation and delivery across different contexts and models of community stroke care is inconsistent and patchy. This realist evaluation explored how and in which circumstances supported self-management is enacted and delivered within community stroke rehabilitation. Specifically, the study aimed to identify and explore contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes related to the delivery of collaborative supported self-management. It comprised a realist synthesis, Q-methodology study, and realist-informed interviews and focus groups with stroke survivors (<i>n</i> = 20), community-based stroke practitioners (<i>n</i> = 20), and community service delivery managers/clinical leads (<i>n</i> = 8) in stroke. The findings revealed that delivering supported self-management effectively and consistently in community stroke rehabilitation starts with <i>embedding the ethos of collaborative supported self-management</i> across staff, teams, and the organisation and involves collaborative relationships with stroke survivors that aim to <i>build trust, confidence,</i> and <i>resilience</i>. The findings identified specific mechanisms and facilitatory and inhibitory contexts that influence how well this is enacted and achieved in practice. A realist approach in this study is novel and has helped to generate new insights and perspectives how and when supported self-management approaches work in community stroke rehabilitation. The findings expand on and complement existing research on the efficacy of supported self-management in stroke and are of clinical importance for informing how collaborative, relational supported self-management approaches can be implemented, personalised, and tailored to people’s needs and evaluated within current healthcare systems.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48195,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Care in the Community","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/9198768","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Social Care in the Community","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/9198768","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The past decade has seen a growing recognition of the role of supported self-management in the provision of long-term care and support for stroke survivors in primary and community care. However, its implementation and delivery across different contexts and models of community stroke care is inconsistent and patchy. This realist evaluation explored how and in which circumstances supported self-management is enacted and delivered within community stroke rehabilitation. Specifically, the study aimed to identify and explore contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes related to the delivery of collaborative supported self-management. It comprised a realist synthesis, Q-methodology study, and realist-informed interviews and focus groups with stroke survivors (n = 20), community-based stroke practitioners (n = 20), and community service delivery managers/clinical leads (n = 8) in stroke. The findings revealed that delivering supported self-management effectively and consistently in community stroke rehabilitation starts with embedding the ethos of collaborative supported self-management across staff, teams, and the organisation and involves collaborative relationships with stroke survivors that aim to build trust, confidence, and resilience. The findings identified specific mechanisms and facilitatory and inhibitory contexts that influence how well this is enacted and achieved in practice. A realist approach in this study is novel and has helped to generate new insights and perspectives how and when supported self-management approaches work in community stroke rehabilitation. The findings expand on and complement existing research on the efficacy of supported self-management in stroke and are of clinical importance for informing how collaborative, relational supported self-management approaches can be implemented, personalised, and tailored to people’s needs and evaluated within current healthcare systems.

Abstract Image

对促进在社区卒中护理中实施支持性自我管理的机制和环境的现实主义评估(IMPETUS 研究)
在过去的十年中,人们越来越认识到支持性自我管理在初级和社区护理中为中风幸存者提供长期护理和支持的作用。然而,在不同的环境和社区中风护理模式中,其实施和执行情况并不一致,也很零散。这项现实主义评估探讨了在社区中风康复中如何以及在何种情况下实施和提供支持性自我管理。具体来说,这项研究旨在确定和探索与提供协作性支持自我管理相关的背景、机制和结果。研究内容包括现实主义综合法、Q-方法研究以及与中风幸存者(n = 20)、社区中风从业人员(n = 20)和中风社区服务提供经理/临床负责人(n = 8)的现实主义访谈和焦点小组。研究结果表明,在社区中风康复中有效、持续地实施支持性自我管理,首先要在员工、团队和组织中树立支持性自我管理的合作精神,并与中风幸存者建立合作关系,以建立信任、信心和复原力。研究结果确定了影响实践中如何实施和实现这一目标的具体机制、促进性和抑制性环境。本研究采用的现实主义方法很新颖,有助于提出新的见解和观点,说明在社区中风康复中,支持性自我管理方法如何以及何时发挥作用。这些研究结果扩展并补充了现有的有关中风患者辅助自我管理有效性的研究,对于指导如何在当前的医疗保健系统中实施协作性、关系性辅助自我管理方法,如何根据患者的需求量身定制个性化的辅助自我管理方法以及如何对这些方法进行评估具有重要的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: Health and Social Care in the community is an essential journal for anyone involved in nursing, social work, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, general practice, health psychology, health economy, primary health care and the promotion of health. It is an international peer-reviewed journal supporting interdisciplinary collaboration on policy and practice within health and social care in the community. The journal publishes: - Original research papers in all areas of health and social care - Topical health and social care review articles - Policy and practice evaluations - Book reviews - Special issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信