Clinical history correlates with lateral atlantoaxial (C1-2) joint edema. A pilot study

Joshua Levin , Matthew Kaufman , Gerald Yeung
{"title":"Clinical history correlates with lateral atlantoaxial (C1-2) joint edema. A pilot study","authors":"Joshua Levin ,&nbsp;Matthew Kaufman ,&nbsp;Gerald Yeung","doi":"10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Clinical evaluation in the determination of the etiology of axial spine pain is limited.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine if a set of three features of the clinical history are indicative of C1-2 joint edema on MRI.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All patients from one physician's practice who had axial cervical spine pain from 2021 to 2023 were evaluated. Cases were defined as those with all 3 of the ASL criteria, defined as Age &gt;65, Superior cervical/suboccipital pain, and exacerbation of pain primarily by Lateral cervical spine rotation. Age-matched controls had axial cervical spine pain without meeting the ASL criteria. Edema around the atlantoaxial joint and/or odontoid was evaluated by STIR MR sequences.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The ASL criteria had a sensitivity of 82 % [95 % CI: 64–100 %], specificity of 79 %, [95 % CI: 63–95 %], positive predictive value of 74 % [95 % CI: 54–94 %], and negative predictive value of 86 % [95 % CI: 72–100 %] in diagnosing C1-2 joint edema.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A positive ASL criteria is sensitive and specific in the diagnosis of C1-2 joint edema, which may have clinical implications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100727,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Pain Medicine","volume":"3 3","pages":"Article 100434"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772594424000554/pdfft?md5=90617d7673e089d7c967112fcefd2684&pid=1-s2.0-S2772594424000554-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772594424000554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Clinical evaluation in the determination of the etiology of axial spine pain is limited.

Objective

To determine if a set of three features of the clinical history are indicative of C1-2 joint edema on MRI.

Methods

All patients from one physician's practice who had axial cervical spine pain from 2021 to 2023 were evaluated. Cases were defined as those with all 3 of the ASL criteria, defined as Age >65, Superior cervical/suboccipital pain, and exacerbation of pain primarily by Lateral cervical spine rotation. Age-matched controls had axial cervical spine pain without meeting the ASL criteria. Edema around the atlantoaxial joint and/or odontoid was evaluated by STIR MR sequences.

Results

The ASL criteria had a sensitivity of 82 % [95 % CI: 64–100 %], specificity of 79 %, [95 % CI: 63–95 %], positive predictive value of 74 % [95 % CI: 54–94 %], and negative predictive value of 86 % [95 % CI: 72–100 %] in diagnosing C1-2 joint edema.

Conclusion

A positive ASL criteria is sensitive and specific in the diagnosis of C1-2 joint edema, which may have clinical implications.

临床病史与寰枢椎(C1-2)外侧关节水肿的相关性。试点研究
背景临床评估在确定轴椎疼痛的病因方面存在局限性。目的确定临床病史中的三组特征是否可指示 MRI 上的 C1-2 关节水肿。方法对一名医生诊所中 2021 年至 2023 年期间出现轴椎颈椎疼痛的所有患者进行评估。病例被定义为符合 ASL 全部 3 项标准的患者,即年龄 65 岁、颈椎/枕骨下上部疼痛、主要通过颈椎外侧旋转加剧疼痛。年龄相匹配的对照组有轴颈椎疼痛,但不符合 ASL 标准。结果 ASL标准在诊断C1-2关节水肿方面的灵敏度为82% [95 % CI: 64-100%],特异度为79% [95 % CI: 63-95%],阳性预测值为74% [95 % CI: 54-94%],阴性预测值为86% [95 % CI: 72-100%]。结论 ASL 阳性标准对诊断 C1-2 关节水肿具有敏感性和特异性,可能具有临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信