{"title":"Clinical history correlates with lateral atlantoaxial (C1-2) joint edema. A pilot study","authors":"Joshua Levin , Matthew Kaufman , Gerald Yeung","doi":"10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Clinical evaluation in the determination of the etiology of axial spine pain is limited.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To determine if a set of three features of the clinical history are indicative of C1-2 joint edema on MRI.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All patients from one physician's practice who had axial cervical spine pain from 2021 to 2023 were evaluated. Cases were defined as those with all 3 of the ASL criteria, defined as Age >65, Superior cervical/suboccipital pain, and exacerbation of pain primarily by Lateral cervical spine rotation. Age-matched controls had axial cervical spine pain without meeting the ASL criteria. Edema around the atlantoaxial joint and/or odontoid was evaluated by STIR MR sequences.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The ASL criteria had a sensitivity of 82 % [95 % CI: 64–100 %], specificity of 79 %, [95 % CI: 63–95 %], positive predictive value of 74 % [95 % CI: 54–94 %], and negative predictive value of 86 % [95 % CI: 72–100 %] in diagnosing C1-2 joint edema.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A positive ASL criteria is sensitive and specific in the diagnosis of C1-2 joint edema, which may have clinical implications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100727,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Pain Medicine","volume":"3 3","pages":"Article 100434"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772594424000554/pdfft?md5=90617d7673e089d7c967112fcefd2684&pid=1-s2.0-S2772594424000554-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772594424000554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Clinical evaluation in the determination of the etiology of axial spine pain is limited.
Objective
To determine if a set of three features of the clinical history are indicative of C1-2 joint edema on MRI.
Methods
All patients from one physician's practice who had axial cervical spine pain from 2021 to 2023 were evaluated. Cases were defined as those with all 3 of the ASL criteria, defined as Age >65, Superior cervical/suboccipital pain, and exacerbation of pain primarily by Lateral cervical spine rotation. Age-matched controls had axial cervical spine pain without meeting the ASL criteria. Edema around the atlantoaxial joint and/or odontoid was evaluated by STIR MR sequences.
Results
The ASL criteria had a sensitivity of 82 % [95 % CI: 64–100 %], specificity of 79 %, [95 % CI: 63–95 %], positive predictive value of 74 % [95 % CI: 54–94 %], and negative predictive value of 86 % [95 % CI: 72–100 %] in diagnosing C1-2 joint edema.
Conclusion
A positive ASL criteria is sensitive and specific in the diagnosis of C1-2 joint edema, which may have clinical implications.