Continuity risk evaluation of the Bayesian posterior integrity monitoring against multiple faults

IF 5 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE
{"title":"Continuity risk evaluation of the Bayesian posterior integrity monitoring against multiple faults","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ast.2024.109531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Compared to the prior integrity monitoring of global navigation satellite system (GNSS), the posterior integrity monitoring incorporates the used GNSS measurements into the computation of integrity risk, thereby providing a more accurate representation of the reliability of position solution. However, the continuity risk evaluation in posterior integrity monitoring remains an unresolved issue. After formulating the posterior integrity risk of each event hypothesis as a parity function, we propose a method to evaluate the posterior continuity risk by computing the cumulative probability of false alarm within a sphere constructed in the parity space. This approach guarantees a conservative estimate of the probability of false alarm, thereby establishing an upper bound for posterior continuity risk. Experiment and analysis based on positioning cases involving GPS, Galileo, and BeiDou satellites suggest that the posterior integrity monitoring can achieve a lower probability of false alarm compared to prior integrity monitoring under certain integrity monitoring configurations. Furthermore, the evaluation accuracy of probability of false alarm inversely correlates with the severity of the differences in solution separation variances.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50955,"journal":{"name":"Aerospace Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerospace Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1270963824006618","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Compared to the prior integrity monitoring of global navigation satellite system (GNSS), the posterior integrity monitoring incorporates the used GNSS measurements into the computation of integrity risk, thereby providing a more accurate representation of the reliability of position solution. However, the continuity risk evaluation in posterior integrity monitoring remains an unresolved issue. After formulating the posterior integrity risk of each event hypothesis as a parity function, we propose a method to evaluate the posterior continuity risk by computing the cumulative probability of false alarm within a sphere constructed in the parity space. This approach guarantees a conservative estimate of the probability of false alarm, thereby establishing an upper bound for posterior continuity risk. Experiment and analysis based on positioning cases involving GPS, Galileo, and BeiDou satellites suggest that the posterior integrity monitoring can achieve a lower probability of false alarm compared to prior integrity monitoring under certain integrity monitoring configurations. Furthermore, the evaluation accuracy of probability of false alarm inversely correlates with the severity of the differences in solution separation variances.

针对多重故障的贝叶斯后验完整性监测的连续性风险评估
与全球导航卫星系统(GNSS)的先验完整性监测相比,后验完整性监测将所使用的 GNSS 测量纳入完整性风险计算,从而更准确地表示位置解决方案的可靠性。然而,后向完整性监测中的连续性风险评估仍是一个悬而未决的问题。在将每个事件假设的后验完整性风险表述为奇偶函数后,我们提出了一种方法,通过计算在奇偶空间中构建的球体内的累积误报概率来评估后验连续性风险。这种方法保证了对误报概率的保守估计,从而确定了后验连续性风险的上限。基于 GPS、伽利略和北斗卫星定位案例的实验和分析表明,在某些完整性监测配置下,后验完整性监测与先验完整性监测相比,可以实现更低的误报概率。此外,误报概率的评估精度与解决方案分离差异的严重程度成反比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aerospace Science and Technology
Aerospace Science and Technology 工程技术-工程:宇航
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
28.60%
发文量
654
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Aerospace Science and Technology publishes articles of outstanding scientific quality. Each article is reviewed by two referees. The journal welcomes papers from a wide range of countries. This journal publishes original papers, review articles and short communications related to all fields of aerospace research, fundamental and applied, potential applications of which are clearly related to: • The design and the manufacture of aircraft, helicopters, missiles, launchers and satellites • The control of their environment • The study of various systems they are involved in, as supports or as targets. Authors are invited to submit papers on new advances in the following topics to aerospace applications: • Fluid dynamics • Energetics and propulsion • Materials and structures • Flight mechanics • Navigation, guidance and control • Acoustics • Optics • Electromagnetism and radar • Signal and image processing • Information processing • Data fusion • Decision aid • Human behaviour • Robotics and intelligent systems • Complex system engineering. Etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信