Reza Tabrizi, Pegah Mehrabi, Shervin Shafiei, Amir Azimi, Hamidreza Moslemi
{"title":"Does crown-to-implant ratio affect marginal bone loss around a single short implant at the posterior of the mandible?","authors":"Reza Tabrizi, Pegah Mehrabi, Shervin Shafiei, Amir Azimi, Hamidreza Moslemi","doi":"10.4103/njms.njms_27_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Short implants are acceptable treatment options for atrophic ridges; however, they increase the crown-to-implant (C/I) ratio compared to regular length implants. The study aimed to assess the correlation between the C/I ratio and marginal bone loss (MBL) in single short implants at the posterior of the mandible.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The study aimed to assess the correlation between the C/I ratio and MBL in single short implants at the posterior of the mandible.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study assessed short implants with 6 mm lengths at the posterior of the mandible. The long-cone peri-apical digital radiographs were taken immediately after loading and 24 months later. Age, gender, implant diameter, gingival biotype, and implant brands were the study variables, and the C/I ratio was the predictive factor. The mean MBL at 2 years was considered the study outcome.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>The Pearson correlation test was applied to assess the correlation between MBL and C/I.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy implants (36 Straumann and 34 SGS implants) were studied. A significant difference was observed in the mean MBL between the two implant brands (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Besides, a correlation was found between MBL and the C/I ratio (<i>P</i> = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It seems that the C/I ratio is associated with an MBL increase in single short implants at the posterior of the mandible.</p>","PeriodicalId":101444,"journal":{"name":"National journal of maxillofacial surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11371288/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National journal of maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_27_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context: Short implants are acceptable treatment options for atrophic ridges; however, they increase the crown-to-implant (C/I) ratio compared to regular length implants. The study aimed to assess the correlation between the C/I ratio and marginal bone loss (MBL) in single short implants at the posterior of the mandible.
Aims: The study aimed to assess the correlation between the C/I ratio and MBL in single short implants at the posterior of the mandible.
Settings and design: Cross-sectional study.
Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study assessed short implants with 6 mm lengths at the posterior of the mandible. The long-cone peri-apical digital radiographs were taken immediately after loading and 24 months later. Age, gender, implant diameter, gingival biotype, and implant brands were the study variables, and the C/I ratio was the predictive factor. The mean MBL at 2 years was considered the study outcome.
Statistical analysis used: The Pearson correlation test was applied to assess the correlation between MBL and C/I.
Results: Seventy implants (36 Straumann and 34 SGS implants) were studied. A significant difference was observed in the mean MBL between the two implant brands (P < 0.001). Besides, a correlation was found between MBL and the C/I ratio (P = 0.002).
Conclusions: It seems that the C/I ratio is associated with an MBL increase in single short implants at the posterior of the mandible.