Performance evaluation of single- and dual-contrast spectral imaging on a photon-counting-detector CT

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Medical physics Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1002/mp.17367
Liqiang Ren, Zhongxing Zhou, Zaki Ahmed, Kishore Rajendran, Joel G. Fletcher, Cynthia H. McCollough, Lifeng Yu
{"title":"Performance evaluation of single- and dual-contrast spectral imaging on a photon-counting-detector CT","authors":"Liqiang Ren,&nbsp;Zhongxing Zhou,&nbsp;Zaki Ahmed,&nbsp;Kishore Rajendran,&nbsp;Joel G. Fletcher,&nbsp;Cynthia H. McCollough,&nbsp;Lifeng Yu","doi":"10.1002/mp.17367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The first commercially available photon-counting-detector CT (PCD-CT) has been introduced for clinical use. However, its spectral performance on single- and dual-contrast imaging tasks has not been comprehensively assessed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the spectral imaging performance of a clinical PCD-CT system for single-contrast material [iodine (I) or gadolinium (Gd)] and dual-contrast materials (I and Gd) in comparison with a dual-source dual-energy CT (DS-DECT).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Iodine (5, 10, and 15 mg/mL) and gadolinium (3.3, 6.6, and 9.9 mg/mL) samples, and their mixtures (I/Gd: 5/3.3 and 10/6.6 mg/mL) were prepared and placed in two torso-shaped water phantoms (lateral dimensions: 30 and 40 cm). These phantoms were scanned on a PCD-CT (NAEOTOM Alpha, Siemens) at 90, 120, and 140 kV. The same phantoms were scanned on a DS-DECT (SOMATOM Force, Siemens) with 70/Sn150, 80/Sn150, 90/Sn150, and 100/Sn150 kV. The radiation dose levels were matched [volume CT dose index (CTDIvol): 10 mGy for the 30 cm phantom and 20 mGy for the 40 cm phantom] across all tube voltage settings and between scanners. Two-material decomposition (I/water or Gd/water) was performed on iodine or gadolinium samples, and three-material decomposition (I/Gd/water) on both individual samples and mixtures. On each decomposed image, mean mass concentration (± standard deviation) was measured in circular region-of-interests placed on the contrast samples. Root-mean-square-error (RMSE) values of iodine and gadolinium concentrations were reported based on the measurements across all contrast samples and repeated on 10 consecutive slices.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>For all material decomposition tasks on the DS-DECT, the kV pairs with greater spectral separation (70/Sn150 kV and 80/Sn150 kV) yielded lower RMSE values than other DS-DECT and PCD-CT alternatives. Specifically, for the optimal 70/Sn150 kV, RMSE values were 1.2 ± 0.1 mg/mL (I) for I/water material decomposition, 1.0 ± 0.1 mg/mL (Gd) for Gd/water material decomposition, and 4.5 ± 0.2 mg/mL (I) and 3.7 ± 0.2 mg/mL (Gd), respectively, for I/Gd/water material decomposition. On the PCD-CT, the optimal tube voltages were 120 or 140 kV for I/water decomposition with RMSE values of 2.0 ± 0.1 mg/mL (I). For Gd/water decomposition on PCD-CT, the optimal tube voltage was 140 kV with gadolinium RMSE values of 1.5 ± 0.1 mg/mL (Gd), with the 90 kV setting on PCD-CT generating higher RMSE values for gadolinium concentration compared to all DS-DECT and PCD-CT alternatives. For three material decomposition, both imaging modalities demonstrated substantially higher RMSE values for iodine and gadolinium, with 90 kV being the optimal tube potential for Gd/I quantitation on PCD-CT [5.4 ± 0.3 mg/mL (I) and 3.9 ± 0.2 mg/mL (Gd)], and DS-DECT at 100/Sn150 kV having larger RMSE values for both materials compared to the alternatives for either modality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Optimal tube voltage for material decomposition on the clinical PCD-CT is task-dependent but inferior to DS-DECT using 70/Sn150 kV or 80/Sn150 kV in two-material decomposition for single-contrast imaging (iodine/water or gadolinium/water). Three material decomposition (iodine/gadolinium/water) in dual-contrast imaging yields substantially higher RMSE for both imaging platforms.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18384,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":"51 11","pages":"8034-8046"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.17367","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The first commercially available photon-counting-detector CT (PCD-CT) has been introduced for clinical use. However, its spectral performance on single- and dual-contrast imaging tasks has not been comprehensively assessed.

Purpose

To evaluate the spectral imaging performance of a clinical PCD-CT system for single-contrast material [iodine (I) or gadolinium (Gd)] and dual-contrast materials (I and Gd) in comparison with a dual-source dual-energy CT (DS-DECT).

Methods

Iodine (5, 10, and 15 mg/mL) and gadolinium (3.3, 6.6, and 9.9 mg/mL) samples, and their mixtures (I/Gd: 5/3.3 and 10/6.6 mg/mL) were prepared and placed in two torso-shaped water phantoms (lateral dimensions: 30 and 40 cm). These phantoms were scanned on a PCD-CT (NAEOTOM Alpha, Siemens) at 90, 120, and 140 kV. The same phantoms were scanned on a DS-DECT (SOMATOM Force, Siemens) with 70/Sn150, 80/Sn150, 90/Sn150, and 100/Sn150 kV. The radiation dose levels were matched [volume CT dose index (CTDIvol): 10 mGy for the 30 cm phantom and 20 mGy for the 40 cm phantom] across all tube voltage settings and between scanners. Two-material decomposition (I/water or Gd/water) was performed on iodine or gadolinium samples, and three-material decomposition (I/Gd/water) on both individual samples and mixtures. On each decomposed image, mean mass concentration (± standard deviation) was measured in circular region-of-interests placed on the contrast samples. Root-mean-square-error (RMSE) values of iodine and gadolinium concentrations were reported based on the measurements across all contrast samples and repeated on 10 consecutive slices.

Results

For all material decomposition tasks on the DS-DECT, the kV pairs with greater spectral separation (70/Sn150 kV and 80/Sn150 kV) yielded lower RMSE values than other DS-DECT and PCD-CT alternatives. Specifically, for the optimal 70/Sn150 kV, RMSE values were 1.2 ± 0.1 mg/mL (I) for I/water material decomposition, 1.0 ± 0.1 mg/mL (Gd) for Gd/water material decomposition, and 4.5 ± 0.2 mg/mL (I) and 3.7 ± 0.2 mg/mL (Gd), respectively, for I/Gd/water material decomposition. On the PCD-CT, the optimal tube voltages were 120 or 140 kV for I/water decomposition with RMSE values of 2.0 ± 0.1 mg/mL (I). For Gd/water decomposition on PCD-CT, the optimal tube voltage was 140 kV with gadolinium RMSE values of 1.5 ± 0.1 mg/mL (Gd), with the 90 kV setting on PCD-CT generating higher RMSE values for gadolinium concentration compared to all DS-DECT and PCD-CT alternatives. For three material decomposition, both imaging modalities demonstrated substantially higher RMSE values for iodine and gadolinium, with 90 kV being the optimal tube potential for Gd/I quantitation on PCD-CT [5.4 ± 0.3 mg/mL (I) and 3.9 ± 0.2 mg/mL (Gd)], and DS-DECT at 100/Sn150 kV having larger RMSE values for both materials compared to the alternatives for either modality.

Conclusion

Optimal tube voltage for material decomposition on the clinical PCD-CT is task-dependent but inferior to DS-DECT using 70/Sn150 kV or 80/Sn150 kV in two-material decomposition for single-contrast imaging (iodine/water or gadolinium/water). Three material decomposition (iodine/gadolinium/water) in dual-contrast imaging yields substantially higher RMSE for both imaging platforms.

光子计数探测器 CT 上单对比和双对比光谱成像的性能评估。
背景:第一台商用光子计数探测器 CT(PCD-CT)已投入临床使用。目的:与双源双能 CT(DS-DECT)相比,评估临床 PCD-CT 系统对单对比材料[碘(I)或钆(Gd)]和双对比材料(I 和 Gd)的光谱成像性能:方法:制备碘(5、10 和 15 毫克/毫升)和钆(3.3、6.6 和 9.9 毫克/毫升)样本及其混合物(I/Gd:5/3.3 和 10/6.6 毫克/毫升),并将其放置在两个躯干形水模型中(横向尺寸:30 和 40 厘米)。在 90、120 和 140 千伏的 PCD-CT (NAEOTOM Alpha,西门子)上对这些模型进行扫描。同样的模型在 DS-DECT(SOMATOM Force,西门子)上以 70/Sn150、80/Sn150、90/Sn150 和 100/Sn150 千伏进行扫描。辐射剂量水平是匹配的[容积 CT 剂量指数 (CTDIvol):30厘米模型为10毫戈瑞,40厘米模型为20毫戈瑞]。对碘或钆样本进行两种物质分解(I/水或 Gd/水),对单个样本和混合物进行三种物质分解(I/Gd/水)。在每张分解图像上,测量对比样本上圆形感兴趣区的平均质量浓度(± 标准偏差)。碘浓度和钆浓度的均方根误差(RMSE)值是根据所有对比样本的测量结果报告的,并在 10 个连续切片上重复测量:结果:对于 DS-DECT 上的所有材料分解任务,与其他 DS-DECT 和 PCD-CT 替代方案相比,光谱分离度更高的 kV 对(70/Sn150 kV 和 80/Sn150 kV)产生的 RMSE 值更低。具体来说,对于最佳的 70/Sn150 kV,I/水材料分解的 RMSE 值为 1.2 ± 0.1 mg/mL(I),Gd/水材料分解的 RMSE 值为 1.0 ± 0.1 mg/mL(Gd),I/Gd/水材料分解的 RMSE 值分别为 4.5 ± 0.2 mg/mL(I)和 3.7 ± 0.2 mg/mL(Gd)。在 PCD-CT 上,I/水分解的最佳管电压为 120 或 140 千伏,RMSE 值为 2.0 ± 0.1 毫克/毫升(I)。对于 PCD-CT 上的钆/水分解,最佳管电压为 140 千伏,钆的 RMSE 值为 1.5 ± 0.1 毫克/毫升(钆),与所有 DS-DECT 和 PCD-CT 相比,PCD-CT 上的 90 千伏设置产生的钆浓度 RMSE 值更高。对于三种材料的分解,两种成像模式都显示出碘和钆的RMSE值要高得多,90 kV是PCD-CT上Gd/I定量的最佳管电压[5.4 ± 0.3 mg/mL(I)和3.9 ± 0.2 mg/mL(Gd)],而100/Sn150 kV的DS-DECT与两种模式的替代方案相比,两种材料的RMSE值都较大:在临床 PCD-CT 上进行材料分解的最佳管电压取决于任务,但在单对比成像(碘/水或钆/水)的两种材料分解中,使用 70/Sn150 kV 或 80/Sn150 kV 的 DS-DECT 比使用 70/Sn150 kV 的 DS-DECT 差。在双对比成像中使用三种材料分解(碘/钆/水)时,两种成像平台的均方根误差都要高得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical physics
Medical physics 医学-核医学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
660
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Medical Physics publishes original, high impact physics, imaging science, and engineering research that advances patient diagnosis and therapy through contributions in 1) Basic science developments with high potential for clinical translation 2) Clinical applications of cutting edge engineering and physics innovations 3) Broadly applicable and innovative clinical physics developments Medical Physics is a journal of global scope and reach. By publishing in Medical Physics your research will reach an international, multidisciplinary audience including practicing medical physicists as well as physics- and engineering based translational scientists. We work closely with authors of promising articles to improve their quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信