Implementation of a Novel Seizure Assessment Tool for Unified Seizure Evaluation Improves Nurse Response.

Thanh Cubria, Emerson B Nairon, Jami Landers, Sonia Joseph, Mishu Chandra, Maria E Denbow, Ryan Hays, DaiWai M Olson
{"title":"Implementation of a Novel Seizure Assessment Tool for Unified Seizure Evaluation Improves Nurse Response.","authors":"Thanh Cubria, Emerson B Nairon, Jami Landers, Sonia Joseph, Mishu Chandra, Maria E Denbow, Ryan Hays, DaiWai M Olson","doi":"10.1097/JNN.0000000000000784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>BACKGROUND: Ictal and postictal testing is an essential aspect of clinical care when diagnosing and treating seizures. The epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) has standard operating procedures for nursing care during and after seizure events, but there is limited interrater reliability. Streamlining ictal and postictal testing processes may enhance care consistency for patients in the EMU unit. The purpose of this study was to create an ictal and postictal seizure assessment tool that would increase the consistency of nursing assessment for EMU patients. METHODS: This prospective study had 4 phases: baseline assessment, instrument development, staff education, and field testing. During baseline assessment, an advanced practice provider and an epilepsy fellow graded nurse ictal and postictal assessment via survey questions. After instrument development, education, and implementation, the same survey was administered to determine if nursing consistency in assessing seizure events improved. The tool used in this study was created by a team of clinical experts to ensure consistency in the assessment of seizure patients. RESULTS: A total of 58 first seizure events were collected over a 6-month intervention period; 27 in the pretest and 31 in the posttest. Paired t test analyses revealed significant improvement in the clinical testing domains of verbal language function ( P < .005), motor function ( P < .0005), and item assessment order ( P < .005) postintervention. There was nonsignificant improvement in the domains of responsiveness (feeling [ P = .597], using a code word [ P = .093]) and visual language function ( P = .602). CONCLUSION: The data captured in this study support the need for this instrument. There is strong need to increase consistency in assessing seizure events and to promote continued collaboration among clinical teams to enhance care to EMU patients. Validation of this instrument will further improve team collaboration by allowing nurses to contribute to their fullest extent.</p>","PeriodicalId":94240,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses","volume":" ","pages":"245-249"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Ictal and postictal testing is an essential aspect of clinical care when diagnosing and treating seizures. The epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) has standard operating procedures for nursing care during and after seizure events, but there is limited interrater reliability. Streamlining ictal and postictal testing processes may enhance care consistency for patients in the EMU unit. The purpose of this study was to create an ictal and postictal seizure assessment tool that would increase the consistency of nursing assessment for EMU patients. METHODS: This prospective study had 4 phases: baseline assessment, instrument development, staff education, and field testing. During baseline assessment, an advanced practice provider and an epilepsy fellow graded nurse ictal and postictal assessment via survey questions. After instrument development, education, and implementation, the same survey was administered to determine if nursing consistency in assessing seizure events improved. The tool used in this study was created by a team of clinical experts to ensure consistency in the assessment of seizure patients. RESULTS: A total of 58 first seizure events were collected over a 6-month intervention period; 27 in the pretest and 31 in the posttest. Paired t test analyses revealed significant improvement in the clinical testing domains of verbal language function ( P < .005), motor function ( P < .0005), and item assessment order ( P < .005) postintervention. There was nonsignificant improvement in the domains of responsiveness (feeling [ P = .597], using a code word [ P = .093]) and visual language function ( P = .602). CONCLUSION: The data captured in this study support the need for this instrument. There is strong need to increase consistency in assessing seizure events and to promote continued collaboration among clinical teams to enhance care to EMU patients. Validation of this instrument will further improve team collaboration by allowing nurses to contribute to their fullest extent.

采用新型癫痫发作评估工具进行统一癫痫发作评估可提高护士的反应能力。
摘要:背景:在诊断和治疗癫痫发作时,发作期和发作后检测是临床护理的一个重要方面。癫痫监护病房(EMU)有癫痫发作期间和发作后护理的标准操作程序,但相互之间的可靠性有限。简化发作期和发作后的检测流程可提高 EMU 病房对患者护理的一致性。本研究的目的是创建一种发作期和发作后癫痫评估工具,以提高对急诊监护室患者护理评估的一致性。方法:这项前瞻性研究分为四个阶段:基线评估、工具开发、员工教育和现场测试。在基线评估期间,一名高级医疗服务提供者和一名癫痫研究员通过调查问题对护士的发作期和发作后评估进行评分。在工具开发、教育和实施之后,进行了同样的调查,以确定护士在评估癫痫发作事件时的一致性是否有所改善。本研究中使用的工具由临床专家团队创建,以确保对癫痫发作患者评估的一致性。结果:在为期 6 个月的干预期间,共收集到 58 次首次癫痫发作事件;其中 27 次为前期测试,31 次为后期测试。配对 t 检验分析表明,干预后临床测试领域的口头语言功能(P < .005)、运动功能(P < .0005)和项目评估顺序(P < .005)均有显著改善。在反应能力(感觉 [P = .597]、使用暗语 [P = .093])和视觉语言功能(P = .602)方面则没有明显改善。结论:本研究获得的数据证明了该工具的必要性。我们亟需提高评估癫痫发作事件的一致性,并促进临床团队之间的持续合作,以加强对急诊室患者的护理。该工具的验证将进一步改善团队合作,使护士能够充分发挥其作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信