Canadian Inpatient Orthogeriatric Models of Care: A Mixed Methods Survey of Facilitators and Barriers.

IF 1.6 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Canadian Geriatrics Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-05 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.5770/cgj.27.743
Dana Trafford, YaJing Liu, Alexandra Papaioannou, George Ioannidis, Jenny Thain
{"title":"Canadian Inpatient Orthogeriatric Models of Care: A Mixed Methods Survey of Facilitators and Barriers.","authors":"Dana Trafford, YaJing Liu, Alexandra Papaioannou, George Ioannidis, Jenny Thain","doi":"10.5770/cgj.27.743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fragility fractures are a serious and common consequence of falls in older adults. Orthogeriatric models of care reduce mortality and morbidity, but, despite this evidence, orthogeriatric programs (OGPs) are not standardized across Canada. The aim of this study was to better understand the facilitators and barriers of OGPs across Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on OGPs across Canada were gathered via email survey to all Canadian Geriatric Society (CGS) members and distributed April 1st to May 1st 2021. Respondents answered 15 questions, using SKIP LOGIC, and data analysis was conducted with Qualtrics<sup>XM</sup> software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>62 CGS members completed the survey. Respondents came from nine provinces/territories, with most being physicians from academic centres. 77% respondents indicated an existing OGP at their site, commonly an optional or automatic geriatrician consult. 23% indicated no formal OGP, of which 56% had an alternative service automatically consulted for older adults with fragility fracture, commonly internal medicine or a hospitalist. Responders indicated the most important factor in establishing an OGP is clinical leadership (56%, 10/18), and the most common barriers are lack of hospital prioritization and lack of funding (41%, 62/153).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The survey found that clinical leadership, hospital prioritization, and available funding are imperative to establishing OGPs. Limitations include the survey being distributed only to CGS members, a lower response rate, and respondents predominantly from academic centres in Ontario. Further qualitative data from other specialties (for example, orthopedics) and greater representation from community hospitals would be helpful to understand additional perceived barriers and facilitators.</p>","PeriodicalId":56182,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","volume":"27 3","pages":"275-280"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11346630/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.27.743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fragility fractures are a serious and common consequence of falls in older adults. Orthogeriatric models of care reduce mortality and morbidity, but, despite this evidence, orthogeriatric programs (OGPs) are not standardized across Canada. The aim of this study was to better understand the facilitators and barriers of OGPs across Canada.

Methods: Data on OGPs across Canada were gathered via email survey to all Canadian Geriatric Society (CGS) members and distributed April 1st to May 1st 2021. Respondents answered 15 questions, using SKIP LOGIC, and data analysis was conducted with QualtricsXM software.

Results: 62 CGS members completed the survey. Respondents came from nine provinces/territories, with most being physicians from academic centres. 77% respondents indicated an existing OGP at their site, commonly an optional or automatic geriatrician consult. 23% indicated no formal OGP, of which 56% had an alternative service automatically consulted for older adults with fragility fracture, commonly internal medicine or a hospitalist. Responders indicated the most important factor in establishing an OGP is clinical leadership (56%, 10/18), and the most common barriers are lack of hospital prioritization and lack of funding (41%, 62/153).

Conclusions: The survey found that clinical leadership, hospital prioritization, and available funding are imperative to establishing OGPs. Limitations include the survey being distributed only to CGS members, a lower response rate, and respondents predominantly from academic centres in Ontario. Further qualitative data from other specialties (for example, orthopedics) and greater representation from community hospitals would be helpful to understand additional perceived barriers and facilitators.

加拿大老年病住院治疗模式:关于促进因素和障碍的混合方法调查》。
背景:脆性骨折是老年人跌倒后常见的严重后果。老年矫形护理模式可降低死亡率和发病率,但尽管有这些证据,加拿大各地的老年矫形计划(OGPs)并未实现标准化。本研究旨在更好地了解加拿大各地老年矫形计划的促进因素和障碍:通过向加拿大老年医学会(CGS)的所有会员发送电子邮件调查,收集有关加拿大各地 OGP 的数据,调查时间为 2021 年 4 月 1 日至 5 月 1 日。受访者使用 SKIP LOGIC 回答了 15 个问题,并使用 QualtricsXM 软件进行了数据分析:62 名中国地质学会会员完成了调查。受访者来自 9 个省/地区,大多数是学术中心的医生。77% 的受访者表示他们所在的医疗机构已有 OGP,通常是可选的或自动的老年医学咨询。23%的受访者表示没有正式的老年保健计划,其中56%的受访者表示有为患有脆性骨折的老年人自动提供咨询的替代服务,通常是内科医生或住院医生。受访者表示,建立 OGP 的最重要因素是临床领导力(56%,10/18),最常见的障碍是缺乏医院优先考虑和缺乏资金(41%,62/153):调查发现,临床领导力、医院优先级和可用资金是建立开放式性别平等计划的必要条件。调查的局限性包括:调查对象仅限于CGS成员、回复率较低、受访者主要来自安大略省的学术中心。来自其他专科(如骨科)的更多定性数据和社区医院的更多代表将有助于了解更多感知到的障碍和促进因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Geriatrics Journal
Canadian Geriatrics Journal Nursing-Gerontology
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Canadian Geriatrics Journal (CGJ) is a peer-reviewed publication that is a home for innovative aging research of a high quality aimed at improving the health and the care provided to older persons residing in Canada and outside our borders. While we gratefully accept submissions from researchers outside our country, we are committed to encouraging aging research by Canadians. The CGJ is targeted to family physicians with training or an interest in the care of older persons, specialists in geriatric medicine, geriatric psychiatrists, and members of other health disciplines with a focus on gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信