Evaluating the tailored implementation of a multisite care navigation service for mental health in rural and remote Australia (The Bridging Study): protocol for a community-engaged hybrid effectiveness-implementation study.

IF 8.8 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Zephanie Tyack, Steven McPhail, Gregory A Aarons, Kelly McGrath, Andrew Barron, Hannah Carter, Sarah Larkins, Adrian Barnett, Eloise Hummell, Ruth Tulleners, Olivia Fisher, Gillian Harvey, Lee Jones, Kate Murray, Bridget Abell
{"title":"Evaluating the tailored implementation of a multisite care navigation service for mental health in rural and remote Australia (The Bridging Study): protocol for a community-engaged hybrid effectiveness-implementation study.","authors":"Zephanie Tyack, Steven McPhail, Gregory A Aarons, Kelly McGrath, Andrew Barron, Hannah Carter, Sarah Larkins, Adrian Barnett, Eloise Hummell, Ruth Tulleners, Olivia Fisher, Gillian Harvey, Lee Jones, Kate Murray, Bridget Abell","doi":"10.1186/s13012-024-01391-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A dramatic decline in mental health of people worldwide in the early COVID-19 pandemic years has not recovered. In rural and remote Australia, access to appropriate and timely mental health services has been identified as a major barrier to people seeking help for mental ill-health. From 2020 to 2021 a care navigation model, Navicare, was co-designed with rural and remote communities in the Greater Whitsunday Region of Central Queensland in Australia. The Exploration, Preparation, Implementation and Sustainment (EPIS) framework was used to design and guide multiple aspects of a multisite study, The Bridging Study, to evaluate the implementation of Navicare in Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A community-engaged hybrid effectiveness-implementation study design will focus on the tailored implementation of Navicare at three new sites as well as monitoring implementation at an existing site established since 2021. Study outcomes assessed will include sustained access as the co-primary outcome (measured using access to Navicare mental health referral services) and Proctor's Implementation Outcomes of feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, adoption, fidelity, implementation cost, and sustainability. Data collection for the implementation evaluation will include service usage data, community consultations, interviews, and workshops; analysed using mixed methods and guided by EPIS and other implementation frameworks. Pre-post effectiveness and cost-consequence study components are embedded in the implementation and sustainment phases, with comparison to pre-implementation data and value assessed for each EPIS phase using hospital, service, and resource allocation data. A scaling up strategy will be co-developed using a national roundtable forum in the final year of the study. Qualitative exploration of other aspects of the study (e.g., mechanisms of action and stakeholder engagement) will be conducted.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our study will use tailoring to local sites and a community-engaged approach to drive implementation of a mental health care navigation service in rural and remote Australia, with expected benefits to mental healthcare access. This approach is consistent with policy recommendations nationally and internationally as building blocks for rural health including the World Health Organization Framework for Action on Strengthening Health Systems to Improve Health Outcomes.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Prospectively registered on April 2, 2024, on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, no. ACTRN12624000382572. https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=386665&isReview=true .</p>","PeriodicalId":54995,"journal":{"name":"Implementation Science","volume":"19 1","pages":"62"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11373177/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implementation Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-024-01391-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A dramatic decline in mental health of people worldwide in the early COVID-19 pandemic years has not recovered. In rural and remote Australia, access to appropriate and timely mental health services has been identified as a major barrier to people seeking help for mental ill-health. From 2020 to 2021 a care navigation model, Navicare, was co-designed with rural and remote communities in the Greater Whitsunday Region of Central Queensland in Australia. The Exploration, Preparation, Implementation and Sustainment (EPIS) framework was used to design and guide multiple aspects of a multisite study, The Bridging Study, to evaluate the implementation of Navicare in Australia.

Methods: A community-engaged hybrid effectiveness-implementation study design will focus on the tailored implementation of Navicare at three new sites as well as monitoring implementation at an existing site established since 2021. Study outcomes assessed will include sustained access as the co-primary outcome (measured using access to Navicare mental health referral services) and Proctor's Implementation Outcomes of feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, adoption, fidelity, implementation cost, and sustainability. Data collection for the implementation evaluation will include service usage data, community consultations, interviews, and workshops; analysed using mixed methods and guided by EPIS and other implementation frameworks. Pre-post effectiveness and cost-consequence study components are embedded in the implementation and sustainment phases, with comparison to pre-implementation data and value assessed for each EPIS phase using hospital, service, and resource allocation data. A scaling up strategy will be co-developed using a national roundtable forum in the final year of the study. Qualitative exploration of other aspects of the study (e.g., mechanisms of action and stakeholder engagement) will be conducted.

Discussion: Our study will use tailoring to local sites and a community-engaged approach to drive implementation of a mental health care navigation service in rural and remote Australia, with expected benefits to mental healthcare access. This approach is consistent with policy recommendations nationally and internationally as building blocks for rural health including the World Health Organization Framework for Action on Strengthening Health Systems to Improve Health Outcomes.

Trial registration: Prospectively registered on April 2, 2024, on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, no. ACTRN12624000382572. https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=386665&isReview=true .

评估针对澳大利亚农村和偏远地区精神健康的多站点护理导航服务的量身定制实施情况(桥梁研究):社区参与的有效性-实施性混合研究协议。
背景:在 COVID-19 大流行的早期,全世界人们的心理健康水平急剧下降,至今仍未恢复。在澳大利亚的农村和偏远地区,获得适当和及时的心理健康服务被认为是人们寻求心理疾病帮助的主要障碍。从 2020 年到 2021 年,我们与澳大利亚昆士兰州中部大圣灵群岛地区的农村和偏远社区共同设计了一种名为 "导航"(Navicare)的护理导航模式。探索、准备、实施和维持(EPIS)框架被用于设计和指导一项多站点研究--"桥梁研究 "的多个方面,以评估Navicare在澳大利亚的实施情况:方法:采用社区参与的成效-实施混合研究设计,重点关注 Navicare 在三个新站点的定制实施情况,以及对 2021 年以来建立的现有站点实施情况的监测。评估的研究成果将包括作为共同主要成果的持续获得性(通过获得 Navicare 心理健康转介服务来衡量),以及 Proctor 的实施成果,即可行性、可接受性、适当性、采用率、忠实度、实施成本和可持续性。实施评估的数据收集将包括服务使用数据、社区咨询、访谈和研讨会;采用混合方法进行分析,并以 EPIS 和其他实施框架为指导。在实施和持续阶段,将进行事前事后效果和成本后果研究,并利用医院、服务和资源分配数据,对 EPIS 各阶段的实施前数据和价值进行比较评估。在研究的最后一年,将通过全国圆桌论坛共同制定推广战略。还将对研究的其他方面(如作用机制和利益相关者参与)进行定性探索:我们的研究将采用因地制宜和社区参与的方法,在澳大利亚农村和偏远地区推动心理保健导航服务的实施,预计将为心理保健服务的获取带来益处。这种方法符合国家和国际上作为农村健康基石的政策建议,包括世界卫生组织关于加强卫生系统以改善健康结果的行动框架:试验注册:2024 年 4 月 2 日在澳大利亚-新西兰临床试验注册中心进行了前瞻性注册,注册号:actrn1262400038。actrn12624000382572. https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=386665&isReview=true .
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Implementation Science
Implementation Science 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Implementation Science is a leading journal committed to disseminating evidence on methods for integrating research findings into routine healthcare practice and policy. It offers a multidisciplinary platform for studying implementation strategies, encompassing their development, outcomes, economics, processes, and associated factors. The journal prioritizes rigorous studies and innovative, theory-based approaches, covering implementation science across various healthcare services and settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信