Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation therapy versus manual therapy in patients with neck pain: a randomised controlled trial.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Tomasz Maicki, Rafał Trąbka, Magdalena Wilk-Frańczuk, Weronika Krzepkowska
{"title":"Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation therapy versus manual therapy in patients with neck pain: a randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Tomasz Maicki, Rafał Trąbka, Magdalena Wilk-Frańczuk, Weronika Krzepkowska","doi":"10.2340/jrm.v56.40002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation therapy with manual therapy in improving the range of motion, decreasing pain, and improving activity of daily living in patients with neck pain.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Double-blinded, randomized, experimental study.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Women aged 45-65 with cervical pain due to osteoarthritis of the vertebral body and intervertebral disc.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 93 randomly selected females were included in the study. They were randomly divided into 2 groups. One received proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation treatment and the other received manual therapy. To evaluate functional capabilities, the Oswestry Disability Index and range of motion measure were used. To evaluate changes in subjective experience of pain the Visual Analogue Scale was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In terms of the activities of daily living, pain, and range of motion of flexion, extension, lateral flexion to the right and left, and rotation to the right and left improvement in group I compared with group II was statistically significant (p < 0.05) at 2 weeks and 3 months' follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment according to proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation is a better method in comparison with manual therapy regarding improvement of pain, range of motion, and daily functioning in patients with cervical pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":54768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v56.40002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation therapy with manual therapy in improving the range of motion, decreasing pain, and improving activity of daily living in patients with neck pain.

Design: Double-blinded, randomized, experimental study.

Patients: Women aged 45-65 with cervical pain due to osteoarthritis of the vertebral body and intervertebral disc.

Methods: A total of 93 randomly selected females were included in the study. They were randomly divided into 2 groups. One received proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation treatment and the other received manual therapy. To evaluate functional capabilities, the Oswestry Disability Index and range of motion measure were used. To evaluate changes in subjective experience of pain the Visual Analogue Scale was used.

Results: In terms of the activities of daily living, pain, and range of motion of flexion, extension, lateral flexion to the right and left, and rotation to the right and left improvement in group I compared with group II was statistically significant (p < 0.05) at 2 weeks and 3 months' follow-up.

Conclusion: Treatment according to proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation is a better method in comparison with manual therapy regarding improvement of pain, range of motion, and daily functioning in patients with cervical pain.

颈部疼痛患者的知觉神经肌肉促进疗法与徒手疗法:随机对照试验。
目的比较本体感觉神经肌肉促进疗法与徒手疗法在改善颈部疼痛患者活动范围、减轻疼痛和改善日常生活活动方面的效果:双盲、随机、实验研究:患者:45-65 岁因椎体和椎间盘骨关节炎导致颈椎疼痛的女性:方法:随机选取 93 名女性作为研究对象。她们被随机分为两组。一组接受本体感觉神经肌肉促进治疗,另一组接受徒手治疗。在评估功能能力时,使用了 Oswestry 残疾指数和运动范围测量法。为了评估疼痛主观感受的变化,采用了视觉模拟量表:结果:与第二组相比,第一组在日常生活活动、疼痛、屈曲、伸展、左右侧屈和左右旋转的活动范围方面的改善具有统计学意义(P在改善颈椎疼痛患者的疼痛、活动范围和日常生活能力方面,本体感觉神经肌肉促进疗法是一种比人工疗法更好的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
102
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine is an international peer-review journal published in English, with at least 10 issues published per year. Original articles, reviews, case reports, short communications, special reports and letters to the editor are published, as also are editorials and book reviews. The journal strives to provide its readers with a variety of topics, including: functional assessment and intervention studies, clinical studies in various patient groups, methodology in physical and rehabilitation medicine, epidemiological studies on disabling conditions and reports on vocational and sociomedical aspects of rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信