Later-Life Creativity and Successful Aging in Neoliberal Agendas.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY
Ieva Stončikaitė
{"title":"Later-Life Creativity and Successful Aging in Neoliberal Agendas.","authors":"Ieva Stončikaitė","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnae125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Although the model of successful aging is already well discussed and has received considerable critical responses, its intersection with the growing enthusiasm for creative engagement among older adults needs further exploration. This article contributes to the growing literature on later-life creativity by examining its relationship with the discourse of successful aging.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The study employs critical humanities-based perspectives and the literature on later-life to address creativity in older age within contemporary neoliberal imperatives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While successful aging is as an antithesis to the narrative of decline, it often fails to capture alternative meanings of aging and the creative engagement in later life. The commercialization and commodification of creativity often function to discipline individuals towards a culture of productivity, optimization, and innovation. However, many older individuals challenge these notions as they create their own models of aging well and authentically that do not align with the ideals of successful aging.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Reductionist, individualistic, and capital-driven understandings of later-life creativity can be broadened by employing critical interdisciplinary approaches, which also help rethink the current meanings of old age and aging. The article will be of interest to scholars, policymakers, artists, and practitioners in gerontological scholarship and the humanities.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnae125","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Although the model of successful aging is already well discussed and has received considerable critical responses, its intersection with the growing enthusiasm for creative engagement among older adults needs further exploration. This article contributes to the growing literature on later-life creativity by examining its relationship with the discourse of successful aging.

Research design and methods: The study employs critical humanities-based perspectives and the literature on later-life to address creativity in older age within contemporary neoliberal imperatives.

Results: While successful aging is as an antithesis to the narrative of decline, it often fails to capture alternative meanings of aging and the creative engagement in later life. The commercialization and commodification of creativity often function to discipline individuals towards a culture of productivity, optimization, and innovation. However, many older individuals challenge these notions as they create their own models of aging well and authentically that do not align with the ideals of successful aging.

Discussion and implications: Reductionist, individualistic, and capital-driven understandings of later-life creativity can be broadened by employing critical interdisciplinary approaches, which also help rethink the current meanings of old age and aging. The article will be of interest to scholars, policymakers, artists, and practitioners in gerontological scholarship and the humanities.

新自由主义议程中的晚年创造力和成功老龄化。
背景和目标:尽管成功老龄化的模式已经得到了广泛的讨论,并得到了相当多的批评性回应,但它与老年人日益增长的创造性参与热情之间的交集还需要进一步探讨。本文通过研究晚年创造力与成功老龄化论述之间的关系,为日益增多的晚年创造力文献做出贡献:研究设计与方法:本研究采用批判性人文视角和晚年生活文献,在当代新自由主义的要求下探讨老年人的创造力问题:虽然成功老龄化是衰退叙事的对立面,但它往往无法捕捉到老龄化的其他含义以及晚年生活中的创造性参与。创造力的商业化和商品化往往是为了约束个人,使其向着生产力、优化和创新的文化方向发展。然而,许多老年人对这些观念提出了挑战,因为他们创造了自己的健康和真实的老龄化模式,这些模式与成功老龄化的理想并不一致:讨论与启示:通过采用批判性的跨学科方法,可以拓宽对晚年创造力的还原论、个人主义和资本驱动的理解,这也有助于重新思考当前老年和老龄化的含义。这篇文章将对老年学和人文学科的学者、政策制定者、艺术家和从业人员有所启发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gerontologist
Gerontologist GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
8.80%
发文量
171
期刊介绍: The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信