Pedagogical challenges at clinical skills centres in nursing education: A phenomenographic study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Nursing Open Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1002/nop2.70019
Malin Tiger Axelsson, Marie Oscarsson, Katarina Swahnberg, Liselott Årestedt
{"title":"Pedagogical challenges at clinical skills centres in nursing education: A phenomenographic study.","authors":"Malin Tiger Axelsson, Marie Oscarsson, Katarina Swahnberg, Liselott Årestedt","doi":"10.1002/nop2.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe educators' conceptions of the pedagogical challenges involved in teaching practical topics to nursing students at clinical skills centres (CSCs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A qualitative descriptive design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study used a phenomenographic approach. Data were collected through individual qualitative interviews with 17 educators teaching at CSCs, between November 2020 and March 2021. The checklist called Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research for qualitative research was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three categories of description emerged regarding the educators' conceptions of the pedagogical challenges: teaching with credibility, teaching with confidence and creating a conducive learning environment. These conceptions were interrelated based on the way that the teaching was performed. Further, the results indicate that educators had to manage two different professional areas, that is, nursing and pedagogy, which both needed to be integrated in order to create the right learning environment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To increase competence and confidence, it is recommended to develop educational course for the educators at the clinical skills centre where pedagogy and nursing are intertwined.</p><p><strong>Implications for the profession: </strong>This study indicated the need for educators to be prepared with credibility and confidence when teaching at CSCs to create a conducive learning environment. In order to develop this, it is key to provide support through formal and informal mentoring and entail the need for educators to combine the two roles of nursing and pedagogy.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ).</p><p><strong>Public contribution: </strong>No patient or public contribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":48570,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Open","volume":"11 9","pages":"e70019"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11373761/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70019","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To describe educators' conceptions of the pedagogical challenges involved in teaching practical topics to nursing students at clinical skills centres (CSCs).

Design: A qualitative descriptive design.

Methods: The study used a phenomenographic approach. Data were collected through individual qualitative interviews with 17 educators teaching at CSCs, between November 2020 and March 2021. The checklist called Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research for qualitative research was used.

Results: Three categories of description emerged regarding the educators' conceptions of the pedagogical challenges: teaching with credibility, teaching with confidence and creating a conducive learning environment. These conceptions were interrelated based on the way that the teaching was performed. Further, the results indicate that educators had to manage two different professional areas, that is, nursing and pedagogy, which both needed to be integrated in order to create the right learning environment.

Conclusion: To increase competence and confidence, it is recommended to develop educational course for the educators at the clinical skills centre where pedagogy and nursing are intertwined.

Implications for the profession: This study indicated the need for educators to be prepared with credibility and confidence when teaching at CSCs to create a conducive learning environment. In order to develop this, it is key to provide support through formal and informal mentoring and entail the need for educators to combine the two roles of nursing and pedagogy.

Reporting method: Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ).

Public contribution: No patient or public contribution.

护理教育中临床技能中心的教学挑战:现象学研究。
目的:描述教育者在临床技能中心(CSC)向护理专业学生教授实践课题时所面临的教学挑战:方法:采用定性描述设计:研究采用现象学方法。在 2020 年 11 月至 2021 年 3 月期间,通过对 17 名在 CSCs 教学的教育工作者进行个别定性访谈收集数据。研究使用了名为 "定性研究报告综合标准 "的定性研究核对表:教育工作者对教学挑战的概念有三类描述:可信的教学、自信的教学和创造有利的学习环境。这些概念根据教学方式相互关联。此外,研究结果表明,教育工作者必须管理两个不同的专业领域,即护理和教学法,这两个领域需要结合起来,以创造合适的学习环境:结论:为提高能力和信心,建议在临床技能中心为教育者开设教育课程,将教学法和护理学结合起来:本研究表明,在临床技能中心教学时,教育工作者需要做好可信度和自信心的准备,以创造一个有利的学习环境。为了做到这一点,关键是要通过正式和非正式的指导来提供支持,并需要教育工作者将护理和教学这两种角色结合起来:报告方法:定性研究报告综合标准(COREQ):无患者或公众贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Open
Nursing Open Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
298
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Open is a peer reviewed open access journal that welcomes articles on all aspects of nursing and midwifery practice, research, education and policy. We aim to publish articles that contribute to the art and science of nursing and which have a positive impact on health either locally, nationally, regionally or globally
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信