Optimization of sub-arc collimator angles in volumetric modulated arc therapy: a heatmap-based blocking index approach for multiple brain metastases.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Shi-Xiong Huang, Song-Hua Yang, Biao Zeng, Xiao-Hua Li
{"title":"Optimization of sub-arc collimator angles in volumetric modulated arc therapy: a heatmap-based blocking index approach for multiple brain metastases.","authors":"Shi-Xiong Huang, Song-Hua Yang, Biao Zeng, Xiao-Hua Li","doi":"10.1007/s13246-024-01477-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To develop and assess an automated Sub-arc Collimator Angle Optimization (SACAO) algorithm and Cumulative Blocking Index Ratio (CBIR) metrics for single-isocenter coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to treat multiple brain metastases. This study included 31 patients with multiple brain metastases, each having 2 to 8 targets. Initially, for each control point, the MLC blocking index was calculated at different collimator angles, resulting in a two-dimensional heatmap. Optimal sub-arc segmentation and collimator angle optimization were achieved using an interval dynamic programming algorithm. Subsequently, VMAT plans were designed using two approaches: SACAO and the conventional Full-Arc Fixed Collimator Angle. CBIR was calculated as the ratio of the cumulative blocking index between the two plan approaches. Finally, dosimetric and planning parameters of both plans were compared. Normal brain tissue, brainstem, and eyes received better protection in the SACAO group (P < 0.05).Query Notable reductions in the SACAO group included 11.47% in gradient index (GI), 15.03% in monitor units (MU), 15.73% in mean control point Jaw area (A<sub>Jaw,mean</sub>), and 19.14% in mean control point Jaw-X width (W<sub>Jaw-X,mean</sub>), all statistically significant (P < 0.001). Furthermore, CBIR showed a strong negative correlation with the degree of plan improvement. The SACAO method enhanced protection of normal organs while improving transmission efficiency and optimization performance of VMAT. In particular, the CBIR metrics show promise in quantifying the differences specifically in the 'island blocking problem' between SACAO and conventional VMAT, and in guiding the enhanced application of the SACAO algorithm.</p>","PeriodicalId":48490,"journal":{"name":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-024-01477-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To develop and assess an automated Sub-arc Collimator Angle Optimization (SACAO) algorithm and Cumulative Blocking Index Ratio (CBIR) metrics for single-isocenter coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to treat multiple brain metastases. This study included 31 patients with multiple brain metastases, each having 2 to 8 targets. Initially, for each control point, the MLC blocking index was calculated at different collimator angles, resulting in a two-dimensional heatmap. Optimal sub-arc segmentation and collimator angle optimization were achieved using an interval dynamic programming algorithm. Subsequently, VMAT plans were designed using two approaches: SACAO and the conventional Full-Arc Fixed Collimator Angle. CBIR was calculated as the ratio of the cumulative blocking index between the two plan approaches. Finally, dosimetric and planning parameters of both plans were compared. Normal brain tissue, brainstem, and eyes received better protection in the SACAO group (P < 0.05).Query Notable reductions in the SACAO group included 11.47% in gradient index (GI), 15.03% in monitor units (MU), 15.73% in mean control point Jaw area (AJaw,mean), and 19.14% in mean control point Jaw-X width (WJaw-X,mean), all statistically significant (P < 0.001). Furthermore, CBIR showed a strong negative correlation with the degree of plan improvement. The SACAO method enhanced protection of normal organs while improving transmission efficiency and optimization performance of VMAT. In particular, the CBIR metrics show promise in quantifying the differences specifically in the 'island blocking problem' between SACAO and conventional VMAT, and in guiding the enhanced application of the SACAO algorithm.

Abstract Image

体积调制弧治疗中弧下准直器角度的优化:基于热图的多发性脑转移瘤阻滞指数方法。
开发并评估用于治疗多发性脑转移瘤的单等中心共面容积调制弧治疗(VMAT)的自动子弧准直器角度优化(SACAO)算法和累积阻塞指数比(CBIR)指标。这项研究包括 31 名患有多发性脑转移瘤的患者,每个患者都有 2 到 8 个靶点。首先,针对每个对照点,计算不同准直器角度下的 MLC 阻滞指数,得出二维热图。使用区间动态编程算法实现了最佳子弧分割和准直器角度优化。随后,使用两种方法设计了 VMAT 计划:SACAO 和传统的全弧固定准直器角度。CBIR 以两种计划方法的累积阻塞指数之比计算。最后,比较了两种计划的剂量测定和计划参数。在 SACAO 组中,正常脑组织、脑干和眼睛得到了更好的保护(P Jaw,平均值),平均控制点 Jaw-X 宽度(WJaw-X,平均值)为 19.14%,均具有统计学意义(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信