Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Lorlatinib Versus Alectinib and Lorlatinib Versus Brigatinib for ALK-Positive Advanced/Metastatic NSCLC: Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons
IF 4.3 3区 材料科学Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Christine Garcia , Devin Abrahami , Anna Polli , Haitao Chu , Conor Chandler , Min Tan , John Mark Kelton , Despina Thomaidou , Todd Bauer
{"title":"Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Lorlatinib Versus Alectinib and Lorlatinib Versus Brigatinib for ALK-Positive Advanced/Metastatic NSCLC: Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons","authors":"Christine Garcia , Devin Abrahami , Anna Polli , Haitao Chu , Conor Chandler , Min Tan , John Mark Kelton , Despina Thomaidou , Todd Bauer","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2024.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The comparative efficacy and safety of lorlatinib, a third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), versus second-generation ALK TKIs as a first-line treatment for ALK+ advanced/metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains uncertain as there are no head-to-head clinical trials.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs) were conducted using phase III trial data demonstrating superior efficacy over crizotinib, a first-generation ALK TKI. MAICs were conducted to compare lorlatinib (CROWN) versus alectinib (ALEX and ALESIA) and brigatinib (ALTA-1L) with matching based on prespecified effect modifiers. Efficacy outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response (OR), and time to progression in the central nervous system (TTP-CNS). Safety outcomes included Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation, dose reduction, or dose interruption.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Lorlatinib was estimated to improve PFS compared to alectinib (ALEX) (HR: 0.54 [95% CI: 0.33, 0.88]) and brigatinib (ALTA-1L) (HR: 0.51 [95% CI: 0.31, 0.82]). Lorlatinib was estimated to improve TTP-CNS compared with brigatinib (HR: 0.19 [95% CI: 0.05, 0.71]). The estimated Grade ≥3 AE rate was higher with lorlatinib than with alectinib (RR: 1.48 [95% CI: 1.13, 1.94]); however, no differences were observed in other safety endpoints (ie, AEs leading to discontinuation, dose reduction, or interruption) or compared to brigatinib.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Lorlatinib was estimated to have superior efficacy over first- and second-generation ALK-TKIs, but a higher rate of Grade ≥3 AEs compared to alectinib. These data support the use of lorlatinib as a first-line treatment for ALK+ advanced/metastatic NSCLC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S152573042400158X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
The comparative efficacy and safety of lorlatinib, a third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), versus second-generation ALK TKIs as a first-line treatment for ALK+ advanced/metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains uncertain as there are no head-to-head clinical trials.
Methods
Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs) were conducted using phase III trial data demonstrating superior efficacy over crizotinib, a first-generation ALK TKI. MAICs were conducted to compare lorlatinib (CROWN) versus alectinib (ALEX and ALESIA) and brigatinib (ALTA-1L) with matching based on prespecified effect modifiers. Efficacy outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response (OR), and time to progression in the central nervous system (TTP-CNS). Safety outcomes included Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation, dose reduction, or dose interruption.
Results
Lorlatinib was estimated to improve PFS compared to alectinib (ALEX) (HR: 0.54 [95% CI: 0.33, 0.88]) and brigatinib (ALTA-1L) (HR: 0.51 [95% CI: 0.31, 0.82]). Lorlatinib was estimated to improve TTP-CNS compared with brigatinib (HR: 0.19 [95% CI: 0.05, 0.71]). The estimated Grade ≥3 AE rate was higher with lorlatinib than with alectinib (RR: 1.48 [95% CI: 1.13, 1.94]); however, no differences were observed in other safety endpoints (ie, AEs leading to discontinuation, dose reduction, or interruption) or compared to brigatinib.
Conclusion
Lorlatinib was estimated to have superior efficacy over first- and second-generation ALK-TKIs, but a higher rate of Grade ≥3 AEs compared to alectinib. These data support the use of lorlatinib as a first-line treatment for ALK+ advanced/metastatic NSCLC.