Evaluating the benefit of progressive tension sutures at the donor site in autologous breast reconstruction – A retrospective comparative cohort study

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
{"title":"Evaluating the benefit of progressive tension sutures at the donor site in autologous breast reconstruction – A retrospective comparative cohort study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.08.064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>As seroma formation is a common donor site complication following autologous breast reconstruction, we adapted the surgical protocol by introducing progressive tension sutures (PTS). This study aimed to evaluate the influence of PTS at the donor site in autologous breast reconstruction on seroma formation. Additionally, an exploratory analysis on patient satisfaction and aesthetic outcome was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective cohort study analyzed data of 400 patients who received autologous breast reconstruction between 2018 and 2022. Among them, 204 patients received traditional donor site closure, and 188 patients received PTS with or without drain placement. Proportional incidence of seroma was described and multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the risk factors for seroma formation. At the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator donor site, patient satisfaction was further explored by administering the BREAST-Q and the aesthetic outcome was graded by three blinded participants.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Overall, 514 breast reconstructions were performed on 400 patients. The incidence of seroma formation was lower in the PTS group compared with that in the traditional closure group. Multivariable analysis showed that patients who received PTS were 40% less likely to develop seroma. Aesthetic outcome was considered more pleasing objectively and subjectively if PTS were performed. Regarding patient satisfaction, no difference was found in the post-operative physical well-being between the two groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In this large cohort, we found reduced incidence of seroma when PTS were performed. PTS were also associated with reduced odds of seroma formation and were described to be aesthetically more pleasing. PTS should be considered in autologous breast reconstruction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681524005138","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

As seroma formation is a common donor site complication following autologous breast reconstruction, we adapted the surgical protocol by introducing progressive tension sutures (PTS). This study aimed to evaluate the influence of PTS at the donor site in autologous breast reconstruction on seroma formation. Additionally, an exploratory analysis on patient satisfaction and aesthetic outcome was performed.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study analyzed data of 400 patients who received autologous breast reconstruction between 2018 and 2022. Among them, 204 patients received traditional donor site closure, and 188 patients received PTS with or without drain placement. Proportional incidence of seroma was described and multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the risk factors for seroma formation. At the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator donor site, patient satisfaction was further explored by administering the BREAST-Q and the aesthetic outcome was graded by three blinded participants.

Results

Overall, 514 breast reconstructions were performed on 400 patients. The incidence of seroma formation was lower in the PTS group compared with that in the traditional closure group. Multivariable analysis showed that patients who received PTS were 40% less likely to develop seroma. Aesthetic outcome was considered more pleasing objectively and subjectively if PTS were performed. Regarding patient satisfaction, no difference was found in the post-operative physical well-being between the two groups.

Conclusions

In this large cohort, we found reduced incidence of seroma when PTS were performed. PTS were also associated with reduced odds of seroma formation and were described to be aesthetically more pleasing. PTS should be considered in autologous breast reconstruction.

评估自体乳房重建中供体部位渐进式张力缝合的益处 - 一项回顾性队列比较研究
背景 由于血清肿形成是自体乳房重建术后常见的供体部位并发症,我们对手术方案进行了调整,引入了渐进式张力缝合(PTS)。本研究旨在评估自体乳房重建中供体部位 PTS 对血清肿形成的影响。此外,还对患者满意度和美学效果进行了探索性分析。方法这项回顾性队列研究分析了2018年至2022年间接受自体乳房重建的400名患者的数据。其中,204 名患者接受了传统的供体部位闭合术,188 名患者接受了有或无引流管置入的 PTS。描述了血清肿的比例发生率,并采用多变量逻辑回归评估血清肿形成的风险因素。在下腹深动脉穿孔供体部位,通过实施BREAST-Q进一步探讨了患者的满意度,并由三名盲人参与者对美学效果进行了评分。与传统闭合组相比,PTS 组血清肿形成的发生率较低。多变量分析显示,接受 PTS 治疗的患者出现血清肿的几率降低了 40%。客观和主观上都认为,如果进行了 PTS,美学效果会更令人满意。在患者满意度方面,两组患者在术后身体健康方面没有差异。结论在这一大型队列中,我们发现进行 PTS 可降低血清肿的发生率,同时也降低了血清肿形成的几率,而且据描述 PTS 更美观。在自体乳房重建中应考虑 PTS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
578
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: JPRAS An International Journal of Surgical Reconstruction is one of the world''s leading international journals, covering all the reconstructive and aesthetic aspects of plastic surgery. The journal presents the latest surgical procedures with audit and outcome studies of new and established techniques in plastic surgery including: cleft lip and palate and other heads and neck surgery, hand surgery, lower limb trauma, burns, skin cancer, breast surgery and aesthetic surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信