Protection against influenza hospitalizations from enhanced influenza vaccines among older adults: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

J M Ferdinands, L H Blanton, E Alyanak, J R Chung, L Trujillo, J Taliano, R L Morgan, A M Fry, L A Grohskopf
{"title":"Protection against influenza hospitalizations from enhanced influenza vaccines among older adults: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"J M Ferdinands, L H Blanton, E Alyanak, J R Chung, L Trujillo, J Taliano, R L Morgan, A M Fry, L A Grohskopf","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Influenza vaccines are available to help protect persons aged ≥65 years, who experience thousands of influenza hospitalizations annually. Because some influenza vaccines may work better than others, we sought to assess benefit of high-dose (HD), adjuvanted (ADJ), and recombinant (RIV) influenza vaccines (\"enhanced influenza vaccines\") compared with standard-dose unadjuvanted influenza vaccines (SD) and with one another for prevention of influenza-associated hospitalizations among persons aged ≥65 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane Library to identify randomized or observational studies published between January 1990 and October 2023 and reporting relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of HD, ADJ, or RIV for prevention of influenza-associated hospitalizations among adults aged ≥65 years. We extracted study data, assessed risk of bias, and conducted random-effects network meta-analysis and meta-regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 32 studies with 90 rVE estimates from five randomized and 27 observational studies (71,459,918 vaccinated participants). rVE estimates varied across studies and influenza seasons. Pooled rVE from randomized studies was 20% (95% CI -54 to 59) and 25% (95% CI -19 to 53) for ADJ and HD compared with SD, respectively; rVE was 6% (95% CI -109 to 58) for HD compared with ADJ; these differences were not statistically significant. In observational studies, ADJ, HD, and RIV conferred modestly increased protection compared with SD (rVE ranging from 10% to 19%), with no significant differences between HD, ADJ, and RIV. With enhanced vaccines combined, rVE versus SD was 18% (95% CI 3 to 32) from randomized and 11% (95% CI 8 to 14) from observational evidence. Meta-regression of observational studies suggested that those requiring laboratory confirmation of influenza reported greater benefit of enhanced vaccines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HD, ADJ, and RIV provided stronger protection than SD against influenza hospitalizations among older adults. No differences in benefit were observed in comparisons of enhanced influenza vaccines with one another.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Influenza vaccines are available to help protect persons aged ≥65 years, who experience thousands of influenza hospitalizations annually. Because some influenza vaccines may work better than others, we sought to assess benefit of high-dose (HD), adjuvanted (ADJ), and recombinant (RIV) influenza vaccines ("enhanced influenza vaccines") compared with standard-dose unadjuvanted influenza vaccines (SD) and with one another for prevention of influenza-associated hospitalizations among persons aged ≥65 years.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane Library to identify randomized or observational studies published between January 1990 and October 2023 and reporting relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of HD, ADJ, or RIV for prevention of influenza-associated hospitalizations among adults aged ≥65 years. We extracted study data, assessed risk of bias, and conducted random-effects network meta-analysis and meta-regression.

Results: We identified 32 studies with 90 rVE estimates from five randomized and 27 observational studies (71,459,918 vaccinated participants). rVE estimates varied across studies and influenza seasons. Pooled rVE from randomized studies was 20% (95% CI -54 to 59) and 25% (95% CI -19 to 53) for ADJ and HD compared with SD, respectively; rVE was 6% (95% CI -109 to 58) for HD compared with ADJ; these differences were not statistically significant. In observational studies, ADJ, HD, and RIV conferred modestly increased protection compared with SD (rVE ranging from 10% to 19%), with no significant differences between HD, ADJ, and RIV. With enhanced vaccines combined, rVE versus SD was 18% (95% CI 3 to 32) from randomized and 11% (95% CI 8 to 14) from observational evidence. Meta-regression of observational studies suggested that those requiring laboratory confirmation of influenza reported greater benefit of enhanced vaccines.

Conclusions: HD, ADJ, and RIV provided stronger protection than SD against influenza hospitalizations among older adults. No differences in benefit were observed in comparisons of enhanced influenza vaccines with one another.

强化流感疫苗对老年人流感住院治疗的保护作用:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
背景:流感疫苗可帮助保护年龄≥65 岁的老人,这些老人每年因流感住院治疗的人数成千上万。由于某些流感疫苗可能比其他疫苗效果更好,因此我们试图评估高剂量(HD)、佐剂(ADJ)和重组(RIV)流感疫苗("加强型流感疫苗")与标准剂量无佐剂流感疫苗(SD)相比以及相互之间相比,对预防年龄≥65 岁的人中与流感相关的住院治疗的益处:我们检索了 MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、Scopus 和 Cochrane 图书馆,以确定 1990 年 1 月至 2023 年 10 月间发表的随机或观察性研究,这些研究报告了 HD、ADJ 或 RIV 在预防年龄≥65 岁的成年人流感相关住院方面的相对疫苗效果 (rVE)。我们提取了研究数据,评估了偏倚风险,并进行了随机效应网络荟萃分析和荟萃回归:我们从 5 项随机研究和 27 项观察研究(71,459,918 名接种者)中确定了 32 项研究,并得出了 90 个 rVE 估计值。与 SD 相比,ADJ 和 HD 的随机研究汇总 rVE 分别为 20% (95% CI -54 至 59) 和 25% (95% CI -19 至 53);与 ADJ 相比,HD 的 rVE 为 6% (95% CI -109 至 58);这些差异在统计学上并不显著。在观察性研究中,与 SD 相比,ADJ、HD 和 RIV 所提供的保护略有增加(rVE 在 10% 到 19% 之间),HD、ADJ 和 RIV 之间没有显著差异。如果合并使用增强型疫苗,随机证据的 rVE 与 SD 相比为 18%(95% CI 3 至 32),观察证据的 rVE 与 SD 相比为 11%(95% CI 8 至 14)。观察性研究的元回归结果表明,需要实验室确认流感的人群接种强化疫苗后获益更大:结论:与 SD 相比,HD、ADJ 和 RIV 可为老年人提供更强的流感住院保护。在对增强型流感疫苗进行比较时,没有观察到它们之间的获益差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信