Whole-Body Multiparametric PET in Clinical Oncology: Current Status, Challenges, and Opportunities.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Tyler J Fraum, Hasan Sari, André H Dias, Ole L Munk, Thomas Pyka, Anne M Smith, Osama R Mawlawi, Richard Laforest, Guobao Wang
{"title":"Whole-Body Multiparametric PET in Clinical Oncology: Current Status, Challenges, and Opportunities.","authors":"Tyler J Fraum, Hasan Sari, André H Dias, Ole L Munk, Thomas Pyka, Anne M Smith, Osama R Mawlawi, Richard Laforest, Guobao Wang","doi":"10.2214/AJR.24.31712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The interpretation of clinical oncologic PET studies has historically used static reconstructions based on SUVs. SUVs and SUV-based images have important limitations, including dependence on uptake times and reduced conspicuity of tracer-avid lesions in organs with high background uptake. The acquisition of dynamic PET images enables additional PET reconstructions via Patlak modeling, which assumes that a tracer is irreversibly trapped by tissues of interest. The resulting multiparametric PET images capture a tracer's net trapping rate and apparent volume of distribution, separating the contributions of bound and free tracer fractions to the PET signal captured in the SUV. Potential benefits of multiparametric PET include higher quantitative stability, superior lesion conspicuity, and greater accuracy for differentiating malignant and benign lesions. However, the imaging protocols necessary for multiparametric PET are inherently more complex and time intensive, despite the recent introduction of automated or semiautomated scanner-based reconstruction packages. In this Review, we examine the current state of multiparametric PET in whole-body oncologic imaging. We summarize the Patlak method and relevant tracer kinetics, discuss clinical workflows and protocol considerations, and highlight clinical challenges and opportunities. We aim to help oncologic imagers make informed decisions about whether to implement multiparametric PET in their clinical practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":55529,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Roentgenology","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Roentgenology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.24.31712","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The interpretation of clinical oncologic PET studies has historically used static reconstructions based on SUVs. SUVs and SUV-based images have important limitations, including dependence on uptake times and reduced conspicuity of tracer-avid lesions in organs with high background uptake. The acquisition of dynamic PET images enables additional PET reconstructions via Patlak modeling, which assumes that a tracer is irreversibly trapped by tissues of interest. The resulting multiparametric PET images capture a tracer's net trapping rate and apparent volume of distribution, separating the contributions of bound and free tracer fractions to the PET signal captured in the SUV. Potential benefits of multiparametric PET include higher quantitative stability, superior lesion conspicuity, and greater accuracy for differentiating malignant and benign lesions. However, the imaging protocols necessary for multiparametric PET are inherently more complex and time intensive, despite the recent introduction of automated or semiautomated scanner-based reconstruction packages. In this Review, we examine the current state of multiparametric PET in whole-body oncologic imaging. We summarize the Patlak method and relevant tracer kinetics, discuss clinical workflows and protocol considerations, and highlight clinical challenges and opportunities. We aim to help oncologic imagers make informed decisions about whether to implement multiparametric PET in their clinical practices.

临床肿瘤学中的全身多参数 PET:现状、挑战和机遇》。
临床肿瘤 PET 研究的解释历来使用基于 SUV 的静态重建。SUV 和基于 SUV 的图像有很大的局限性,包括对吸收时间的依赖性,以及在高背景吸收的器官中示踪剂显像病变的不确定性。采集动态 PET 图像可通过 Patlak 建模进行额外的 PET 重建,该建模假定示踪剂被相关组织不可逆地捕获。由此产生的多参数 PET 图像可捕获示踪剂的净捕获率(Ki)和表观分布容积(VD),从而分离出结合和游离示踪剂部分对 SUV 中捕获的 PET 信号的贡献。多参数 PET 的潜在优势包括定量稳定性更高、病变更清晰、区分恶性和良性病变更准确。然而,尽管最近推出了基于扫描仪的自动或半自动重建软件包,但多参数 PET 所需的成像方案本质上更加复杂和耗时。在本综述中,我们将探讨多参数 PET 在全身肿瘤成像中的应用现状。我们总结了 Patlak 方法和相关示踪剂动力学,讨论了临床工作流程和方案注意事项,并强调了临床挑战和机遇。我们的目的是帮助肿瘤成像人员在临床实践中做出是否实施多参数 PET 的明智决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
920
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1907, the monthly American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR) is the world’s longest continuously published general radiology journal. AJR is recognized as among the specialty’s leading peer-reviewed journals and has a worldwide circulation of close to 25,000. The journal publishes clinically-oriented articles across all radiology subspecialties, seeking relevance to radiologists’ daily practice. The journal publishes hundreds of articles annually with a diverse range of formats, including original research, reviews, clinical perspectives, editorials, and other short reports. The journal engages its audience through a spectrum of social media and digital communication activities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信