Diagnostic Performance of MRI and FDG PET/CT for Preoperative Locoregional Staging of Colon Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Daan J Sikkenk, Isabelle J Henskens, Bart van de Laar, Thijs A Burghgraef, David W da Costa, Inne Somers, Paul M Verheijen, Joost Nederend, Wouter B Nagengast, Pieter J Tanis, Esther C J Consten
{"title":"Diagnostic Performance of MRI and FDG PET/CT for Preoperative Locoregional Staging of Colon Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Daan J Sikkenk, Isabelle J Henskens, Bart van de Laar, Thijs A Burghgraef, David W da Costa, Inne Somers, Paul M Verheijen, Joost Nederend, Wouter B Nagengast, Pieter J Tanis, Esther C J Consten","doi":"10.2214/AJR.24.31440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> CT is the standard-of-care test for colon cancer (CC) preoperative locoregional staging, but has limited diagnostic performance. More accurate preoperative staging would guide selection among expanding patient-tailored treatment options. <b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the diagnostic performance of MRI for T and N staging and of FDG PET/CT for N staging in CC locoregional staging through systematic review. <b>Evidence Acquisition:</b> PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched through December 31, 2023 for studies reporting diagnostic performance of MRI or FDG PET/CT for primary (nonrectal) CC before resection without neoadjuvant therapy using histopathology as reference. Study quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Publication bias was assessed with Deeks' funnel plot. Primary outcomes were estimated pooled predictive values, stratified by T and N categories for MRI and N categories for PET/CT. Secondary outcomes were pooled sensitivity and specificity. <b>Evidence Synthesis:</b> The systematic review included 11 MRI studies (686 patients) and five PET/CT studies (408 patients). Thirteen studies had at least one risk of bias or concern of applicability. Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry indicated possible publication bias in MRI studies for differentiation of T3cd-4 from T1-3ab disease and N- from N+ disease. For MRI, for discriminating T1-2 from T3-4 disease, PPV was 64.8% (95% CI [52.9-75.5%]), and NPV was 88.9% (95% CI [82.7-93.7%]); for discriminating T1-3ab from T3cd-4 disease, PPV was 83.4% (95% CI [75.0-90.3%]), and NPV was 74.6% (95% CI [58.2-86.7%]); for discriminating T1-3 from T4 disease, PPV was 94.0% (95% CI [89.4-97.3%]), and NPV was 39.9% (95% CI [24.9-56.6%]); for discriminating N- from N+ disease, PPV was 74.9% (95% CI [69.3-80.0%]), and NPV was 53.9% (95% CI [45.3-62.0%]). For PET/CT, for discriminating N- from N+ disease, PPV was 76.4% (95% CI [67.9-85.1%]), and NPV was 68.2% (95% CI [56.8-78.6%]). Across outcomes, MRI and PET/CT exhibited pooled sensitivity of 55.1-81.4% and pooled specificity of 70.3-88.1%. <b>Conclusion:</b> MRI had strongest predictive performance for T1-2 and T4 disease. MRI and PET/CT had otherwise limited predictive values, sensitivity, and specificity for evaluated outcomes related T and N staging. <b>Clinical Impact:</b> MRI and FDG PET/CT had overall limited utility for preoperative locoregional staging in colon cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":55529,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Roentgenology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Roentgenology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.24.31440","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: CT is the standard-of-care test for colon cancer (CC) preoperative locoregional staging, but has limited diagnostic performance. More accurate preoperative staging would guide selection among expanding patient-tailored treatment options. Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of MRI for T and N staging and of FDG PET/CT for N staging in CC locoregional staging through systematic review. Evidence Acquisition: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched through December 31, 2023 for studies reporting diagnostic performance of MRI or FDG PET/CT for primary (nonrectal) CC before resection without neoadjuvant therapy using histopathology as reference. Study quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Publication bias was assessed with Deeks' funnel plot. Primary outcomes were estimated pooled predictive values, stratified by T and N categories for MRI and N categories for PET/CT. Secondary outcomes were pooled sensitivity and specificity. Evidence Synthesis: The systematic review included 11 MRI studies (686 patients) and five PET/CT studies (408 patients). Thirteen studies had at least one risk of bias or concern of applicability. Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry indicated possible publication bias in MRI studies for differentiation of T3cd-4 from T1-3ab disease and N- from N+ disease. For MRI, for discriminating T1-2 from T3-4 disease, PPV was 64.8% (95% CI [52.9-75.5%]), and NPV was 88.9% (95% CI [82.7-93.7%]); for discriminating T1-3ab from T3cd-4 disease, PPV was 83.4% (95% CI [75.0-90.3%]), and NPV was 74.6% (95% CI [58.2-86.7%]); for discriminating T1-3 from T4 disease, PPV was 94.0% (95% CI [89.4-97.3%]), and NPV was 39.9% (95% CI [24.9-56.6%]); for discriminating N- from N+ disease, PPV was 74.9% (95% CI [69.3-80.0%]), and NPV was 53.9% (95% CI [45.3-62.0%]). For PET/CT, for discriminating N- from N+ disease, PPV was 76.4% (95% CI [67.9-85.1%]), and NPV was 68.2% (95% CI [56.8-78.6%]). Across outcomes, MRI and PET/CT exhibited pooled sensitivity of 55.1-81.4% and pooled specificity of 70.3-88.1%. Conclusion: MRI had strongest predictive performance for T1-2 and T4 disease. MRI and PET/CT had otherwise limited predictive values, sensitivity, and specificity for evaluated outcomes related T and N staging. Clinical Impact: MRI and FDG PET/CT had overall limited utility for preoperative locoregional staging in colon cancer.

用于结肠癌术前局部分期的 MRI 和 FDG PET/CT 的诊断性能:系统回顾与元分析》。
背景:CT 是结肠癌(CC)术前局部区域分期的标准检测方法,但诊断效果有限。更准确的术前分期将指导患者选择更多的治疗方案。目的通过系统回顾评估 MRI 的 T 和 N 分期以及 FDG PET/CT 的 N 分期在 CC 局部区域分期中的诊断性能。证据获取:检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆截至2023年12月31日的研究,以组织病理学为参考,报告MRI或FDG PET/CT对未经新辅助治疗的原发性(非直肠)CC切除术前的诊断性能。研究质量采用 QUADAS-2 工具进行评估。采用Deeks漏斗图评估发表偏倚。主要结果是按MRI的T和N分类以及PET/CT的N分类估算的汇总预测值。次要结果是汇总的敏感性和特异性。证据综述:系统综述包括 11 项 MRI 研究(686 名患者)和 5 项 PET/CT 研究(408 名患者)。13项研究至少存在一项偏倚风险或适用性问题。Deeks漏斗图不对称表明,MRI研究在区分T3cd-4和T1-3ab疾病以及N-和N+疾病方面可能存在发表偏倚。MRI 鉴别 T1-2 和 T3-4 疾病的 PPV 为 64.8%(95% CI [52.9-75.5%]),NPV 为 88.9%(95% CI [82.7-93.7%]);鉴别 T1-3ab 和 T3cd-4 疾病的 PPV 为 83.4%(95% CI [75.0-90.3%]),NPV 为 74.6%(95% CI [58.2-86.7%]);鉴别 T1-3 和 T4 疾病的 PPV 为 94.0%(95% CI [89.4-97.3%]),NPV 为 39.9%(95% CI [24.9-56.6%]);鉴别 N- 和 N+ 疾病的 PPV 为 74.9%(95% CI [69.3-80.0%]),NPV 为 53.9%(95% CI [45.3-62.0%])。就 PET/CT 而言,区分 N- 和 N+ 疾病的 PPV 为 76.4%(95% CI [67.9-85.1%]),NPV 为 68.2%(95% CI [56.8-78.6%])。在所有结果中,MRI 和 PET/CT 的集合敏感性为 55.1-81.4%,集合特异性为 70.3-88.1%。结论:MRIMRI对T1-2和T4疾病的预测能力最强。MRI和PET/CT对与T和N分期相关的评估结果的预测值、敏感性和特异性均有限。临床影响:MRI 和 FDG PET/CT 对结肠癌术前局部分期的总体作用有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
920
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1907, the monthly American Journal of Roentgenology (AJR) is the world’s longest continuously published general radiology journal. AJR is recognized as among the specialty’s leading peer-reviewed journals and has a worldwide circulation of close to 25,000. The journal publishes clinically-oriented articles across all radiology subspecialties, seeking relevance to radiologists’ daily practice. The journal publishes hundreds of articles annually with a diverse range of formats, including original research, reviews, clinical perspectives, editorials, and other short reports. The journal engages its audience through a spectrum of social media and digital communication activities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信