Comparative Analytical Evaluation of the Proposed Biosimilar FYB206 and its Reference Medicinal Product Keytruda®.

Abstract

Background and objective: Biological medicinal products improve patients' lives, but access is limited, mainly due to high costs. Patents for many existing biological products are expiring, and generic versions, which are referred to as biosimilars, are produced to serve as an alternative to the reference medicinal product (RMP) cutting down the costs and expanding access. The present paper assesses the analytical similarity between Formycon's FYB206 pembrolizumab biosimilar candidate and Keytruda^®, an RMP that is approved to treat various types of cancer, with the intention of determining FYB206's suitability to enter clinical biosimilar trials.

Methods: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are biological medicinal products that are characterized by a high overall heterogeneity. Due to the complex nature of these molecules, a comprehensive comparative analytical assessment was designed to demonstrate analytical similarity in all clinically relevant quality attributes between RMP and the corresponding biosimilar candidate. This exercise addresses physicochemical, biophysical as well as functional characteristics.

Results: The comparative analytical evaluation results demonstrate that the proposed biosimilar is structurally and functionally highly similar to the RMP, showing only minor differences for some quality attributes that are justified to be noncritical for clinical efficacy and safety.

Conclusion: Based on physicochemical and biological characteristics, FYB206 is suitable to enter the clinical phase.