Data analysis of patients with positive mould or dimorphic fungal cultures from sterile sites.

IF 1.4 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2024-08-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajid.v39i1.630
Bonita van der Westhuizen, Samantha Potgieter
{"title":"Data analysis of patients with positive mould or dimorphic fungal cultures from sterile sites.","authors":"Bonita van der Westhuizen, Samantha Potgieter","doi":"10.4102/sajid.v39i1.630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Moulds and dimorphic fungi are increasingly recognised as pathogens carrying high morbidity and mortality in critically ill and immune-compromised patients. The lack of surveillance data limits our understanding of these infections.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the distribution, patient characteristics, risk factors, therapy and treatment outcome in patients with positive mould or dimorphic fungal cultures from sterile sites at a tertiary hospital in central South Africa.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>All moulds or dimorphic fungi cultured from sterile specimens from 1 July 2014 to 30 June 2017 were identified retrospectively. Laboratory and clinical records were reviewed. Information collected included gender and age, type of specimen collected for investigation, specific fungi isolated, underlying conditions, other contributing risk factors, treatment and outcome of the patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-eight patient records were analysed. Male and female patients were equally distributed. The mean age was 40.5 years (range 7-78 years). <i>Aspergillus</i> spp. were most commonly isolated. The most common underlying condition was HIV infection, followed by haematological conditions. Twenty-six (54.2%) patients received treatment involving antifungal therapy alone (<i>n</i> = 19; 73.1%), surgery alone (<i>n</i> = 5; 19.2%) or a combined medical and surgical approach (<i>n</i> = 2; 7.7%). Twenty-two (45.8%) patients received no treatment. The overall mortality rate was 25.0% (<i>n</i> = 12).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The diagnosis of fungal infections remains challenging. In the current study, moulds and dimorphic fungi were isolated from at-risk patients' specimens. Despite treatment with appropriate antifungal agents, the associated mortality rate was high.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>This study contributes to the growing body of knowledge on these potentially life-threatening infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":44007,"journal":{"name":"Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"39 1","pages":"630"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11369746/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajid.v39i1.630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Moulds and dimorphic fungi are increasingly recognised as pathogens carrying high morbidity and mortality in critically ill and immune-compromised patients. The lack of surveillance data limits our understanding of these infections.

Objectives: To determine the distribution, patient characteristics, risk factors, therapy and treatment outcome in patients with positive mould or dimorphic fungal cultures from sterile sites at a tertiary hospital in central South Africa.

Method: All moulds or dimorphic fungi cultured from sterile specimens from 1 July 2014 to 30 June 2017 were identified retrospectively. Laboratory and clinical records were reviewed. Information collected included gender and age, type of specimen collected for investigation, specific fungi isolated, underlying conditions, other contributing risk factors, treatment and outcome of the patients.

Results: Forty-eight patient records were analysed. Male and female patients were equally distributed. The mean age was 40.5 years (range 7-78 years). Aspergillus spp. were most commonly isolated. The most common underlying condition was HIV infection, followed by haematological conditions. Twenty-six (54.2%) patients received treatment involving antifungal therapy alone (n = 19; 73.1%), surgery alone (n = 5; 19.2%) or a combined medical and surgical approach (n = 2; 7.7%). Twenty-two (45.8%) patients received no treatment. The overall mortality rate was 25.0% (n = 12).

Conclusion: The diagnosis of fungal infections remains challenging. In the current study, moulds and dimorphic fungi were isolated from at-risk patients' specimens. Despite treatment with appropriate antifungal agents, the associated mortality rate was high.

Contribution: This study contributes to the growing body of knowledge on these potentially life-threatening infections.

对无菌部位霉菌或二形体真菌培养呈阳性的患者进行数据分析。
背景:霉菌和二形真菌越来越被认为是危重病人和免疫力低下的病人中发病率和死亡率较高的病原体。缺乏监测数据限制了我们对这些感染的了解:目的:确定南非中部一家三甲医院无菌部位霉菌或二形体真菌培养阳性患者的分布情况、患者特征、风险因素、治疗方法和治疗结果:方法:对2014年7月1日至2017年6月30日期间从无菌标本中培养出的所有霉菌或双态真菌进行回顾性鉴定。回顾了实验室和临床记录。收集的信息包括性别和年龄、为调查而采集的标本类型、分离出的特定真菌、基础疾病、其他风险因素、患者的治疗和结果:对 48 份病历进行了分析。男女患者人数相当。平均年龄为 40.5 岁(7-78 岁不等)。最常分离出曲霉菌属。最常见的基础疾病是艾滋病毒感染,其次是血液病。26名患者(54.2%)接受了单纯抗真菌治疗(19人;73.1%)、单纯手术治疗(5人;19.2%)或内外科联合治疗(2人;7.7%)。22名患者(45.8%)未接受任何治疗。总死亡率为 25.0%(12 人):结论:真菌感染的诊断仍然具有挑战性。在本研究中,从高危患者的标本中分离出了霉菌和二形真菌。尽管使用了适当的抗真菌药物进行治疗,但相关死亡率仍然很高:本研究有助于加深人们对这些可能危及生命的感染的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
11.10%
发文量
50
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信