Validation of the Retirement Resources Inventory in Persian: Assessing Psychometric Properties among Iranian Retirees.

Q2 Medicine
Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research Pub Date : 2024-08-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/1467773
Elaheh Shoushtari-Moghaddam, Abdolrahim Asadollahi, Mohammad Hossein Kaveh
{"title":"Validation of the Retirement Resources Inventory in Persian: Assessing Psychometric Properties among Iranian Retirees.","authors":"Elaheh Shoushtari-Moghaddam, Abdolrahim Asadollahi, Mohammad Hossein Kaveh","doi":"10.1155/2024/1467773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Retirement resources are considered one of the key determinants of well-being and coping with the challenging situations of retirement courses. Therefore, due to the lack of a valid questionnaire for research and practice at the national level as well as international comparisons, this study was conducted to translate the original retirement resources inventory into Persian and assess the validity and reliability of the Persian version.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The research employed a cross-sectional descriptive methodological approach, beginning with translating the questionnaire into Persian. Psychometric properties were evaluated through face, content, construct validity, and reliability tests. 335 participants were involved in assessing construct validity, while 30 participants contributed to the internal consistency test, and 20 took part in the test-retest reliability test. Data analysis was performed using SPSS Version 26 and AMOS 24 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed eight components with eigenvalues greater than 1, accounting for 46.68% of the variance, with no questions being removed. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated that all items had a factor loading above 0.3, resulting in a final model with 35 items and eight factors, supported by fit indices (<i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup>/df = 1.95, TLI: 0.87, IFI = 0.88, RMSEA = 0.05, GFI: 0.85). Reliability measures showed Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranging from 0.71 to 0.83 and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.93.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study concludes that the Persian version of the RRI, encompassing 35 items across eight dimensions, is a valid and reliable tool for the Iranian retiree population. This validated inventory can be utilized in future national and international studies, particularly experimental ones, to develop well-being and retirement adjustment programs, thereby aiding in understanding and supporting Iranian retirees.</p>","PeriodicalId":39066,"journal":{"name":"Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research","volume":"2024 ","pages":"1467773"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11368552/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/1467773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Retirement resources are considered one of the key determinants of well-being and coping with the challenging situations of retirement courses. Therefore, due to the lack of a valid questionnaire for research and practice at the national level as well as international comparisons, this study was conducted to translate the original retirement resources inventory into Persian and assess the validity and reliability of the Persian version.

Materials and methods: The research employed a cross-sectional descriptive methodological approach, beginning with translating the questionnaire into Persian. Psychometric properties were evaluated through face, content, construct validity, and reliability tests. 335 participants were involved in assessing construct validity, while 30 participants contributed to the internal consistency test, and 20 took part in the test-retest reliability test. Data analysis was performed using SPSS Version 26 and AMOS 24 software.

Results: The exploratory factor analysis (EFA) revealed eight components with eigenvalues greater than 1, accounting for 46.68% of the variance, with no questions being removed. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated that all items had a factor loading above 0.3, resulting in a final model with 35 items and eight factors, supported by fit indices (χ 2/df = 1.95, TLI: 0.87, IFI = 0.88, RMSEA = 0.05, GFI: 0.85). Reliability measures showed Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranging from 0.71 to 0.83 and an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.93.

Conclusion: The study concludes that the Persian version of the RRI, encompassing 35 items across eight dimensions, is a valid and reliable tool for the Iranian retiree population. This validated inventory can be utilized in future national and international studies, particularly experimental ones, to develop well-being and retirement adjustment programs, thereby aiding in understanding and supporting Iranian retirees.

波斯语退休资源调查表的验证:评估伊朗退休人员的心理测量特性。
导言:退休资源被认为是决定幸福感和应对退休课程挑战性情况的关键因素之一。因此,由于缺乏有效的调查问卷用于国家层面的研究和实践以及国际比较,本研究将原始的退休资源清单翻译成波斯语,并评估波斯语版本的有效性和可靠性:研究采用了横断面描述性方法,首先将问卷翻译成波斯文。通过表面、内容、结构效度和信度测试对心理测量特性进行了评估。335 名参与者参与了建构效度评估,30 名参与者参与了内部一致性测试,20 名参与者参与了重复测试可靠性测试。数据分析使用 SPSS 26 版和 AMOS 24 软件进行:探索性因素分析(EFA)显示,有 8 个成分的特征值大于 1,占方差的 46.68%,没有问题被删除。确认性因素分析(CFA)表明,所有项目的因素负荷都超过了 0.3,最终形成了一个包含 35 个项目和 8 个因素的模型,拟合指数(χ 2/df = 1.95、TLI:0.87、IFI = 0.88、RMSEA = 0.05、GFI:0.85)支持该模型。可靠性测量结果显示,Cronbach's alpha 系数为 0.71 至 0.83,类内相关系数(ICC)为 0.93:研究得出结论,波斯语版 RRI 包含八个维度的 35 个项目,对于伊朗退休人员群体来说是一个有效且可靠的工具。在未来的国内和国际研究中,尤其是在实验研究中,可以利用这一经过验证的清单来制定福利和退休调整计划,从而帮助了解和支持伊朗退休人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research
Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信