Quantifying Efficacy of Video Interventions about Adverse Events in Medical Student Education.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Eric Wahlstedt, Brittany Levy, William Cranford, Adam Dugan, Justin Ziemba, Andrew Harris
{"title":"Quantifying Efficacy of Video Interventions about Adverse Events in Medical Student Education.","authors":"Eric Wahlstedt, Brittany Levy, William Cranford, Adam Dugan, Justin Ziemba, Andrew Harris","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic catalyzed a rapid shift toward remote learning in medicine. This study hypothesized that using videos on adverse events and patient safety event reporting systems could enhance education and motivation among healthcare professionals, leading to improved performance on quizzes compared with those exposed to standard, in-person lectures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were randomly assigned to a group both watching the video and attending an in-person lecture or a group that received only the in-person lecture in this study performed in 2022. Surveys gathered demographic information, tested knowledge, and identified barriers to reporting adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 83 unique participants responded to the survey out of the 130 students enrolled (64%; 83/130). Among the students completing all of the surveys, the group who watched the Osmosis video had a higher average quiz score (6.46/7) than the lecture group (6.31/7) following the first intervention. Only 25% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that they knew what to include in a patient safety report and only 10% agreed or strongly agreed that they knew how to access the reporting system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests virtual preclass video learning can be a beneficial tool to complement traditional lecture-based learning in medical education. Further research is needed to determine the efficacy of long-term video interventions in adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":"117 9","pages":"551-555"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001733","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic catalyzed a rapid shift toward remote learning in medicine. This study hypothesized that using videos on adverse events and patient safety event reporting systems could enhance education and motivation among healthcare professionals, leading to improved performance on quizzes compared with those exposed to standard, in-person lectures.

Methods: Participants were randomly assigned to a group both watching the video and attending an in-person lecture or a group that received only the in-person lecture in this study performed in 2022. Surveys gathered demographic information, tested knowledge, and identified barriers to reporting adverse events.

Results: A total of 83 unique participants responded to the survey out of the 130 students enrolled (64%; 83/130). Among the students completing all of the surveys, the group who watched the Osmosis video had a higher average quiz score (6.46/7) than the lecture group (6.31/7) following the first intervention. Only 25% of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that they knew what to include in a patient safety report and only 10% agreed or strongly agreed that they knew how to access the reporting system.

Conclusions: This study suggests virtual preclass video learning can be a beneficial tool to complement traditional lecture-based learning in medical education. Further research is needed to determine the efficacy of long-term video interventions in adverse events.

量化医学生教育中不良事件视频干预的效果。
目标:2019 年冠状病毒疾病大流行促使医学界迅速转向远程学习。本研究假设,使用有关不良事件和患者安全事件报告系统的视频可以加强医护人员的教育和积极性,从而使他们在测验中的成绩比那些接受标准现场讲座的人有所提高:在这项于 2022 年进行的研究中,参与者被随机分配到既观看视频又参加现场讲座的小组,或只参加现场讲座的小组。调查收集了人口统计学信息,测试了知识,并确定了报告不良事件的障碍:在注册的 130 名学生中,共有 83 名学生对调查做出了回应(64%;83/130)。在完成所有调查的学生中,观看 Osmosis 视频组的平均测验分数(6.46/7)高于首次干预后的讲座组(6.31/7)。只有25%的受访者同意或非常同意他们知道患者安全报告中应包括哪些内容,只有10%的受访者同意或非常同意他们知道如何进入报告系统:本研究表明,虚拟课前视频学习是医学教育中补充传统讲授式学习的有益工具。要确定长期视频干预对不良事件的疗效,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Southern Medical Journal
Southern Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
222
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the Birmingham, Alabama-based Southern Medical Association (SMA), the Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) has for more than 100 years provided the latest clinical information in areas that affect patients'' daily lives. Now delivered to individuals exclusively online, the SMJ has a multidisciplinary focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists in all relevant aspects of the profession, including medicine and medical specialties, surgery and surgery specialties; child and maternal health; mental health; emergency and disaster medicine; public health and environmental medicine; bioethics and medical education; and quality health care, patient safety, and best practices. Each month, articles span the spectrum of medical topics, providing timely, up-to-the-minute information for both primary care physicians and specialists. Contributors include leaders in the healthcare field from across the country and around the world. The SMJ enables physicians to provide the best possible care to patients in this age of rapidly changing modern medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信