Mechanical ventilation settings during weaning from venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Maria Teresa Passarelli, Matthieu Petit, Roberta Garberi, Guillaume Lebreton, Charles Edouard Luyt, Marc Pineton De Chambrun, Juliette Chommeloux, Guillaume Hékimian, Emanuele Rezoagli, Giuseppe Foti, Alain Combes, Marco Giani, Matthieu Schmidt
{"title":"Mechanical ventilation settings during weaning from venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.","authors":"Maria Teresa Passarelli, Matthieu Petit, Roberta Garberi, Guillaume Lebreton, Charles Edouard Luyt, Marc Pineton De Chambrun, Juliette Chommeloux, Guillaume Hékimian, Emanuele Rezoagli, Giuseppe Foti, Alain Combes, Marco Giani, Matthieu Schmidt","doi":"10.1186/s13613-024-01359-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal timing of weaning from venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) and its modalities have been rarely studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, multicenter cohort study over 7 years in two tertiary ICUs, high-volume ECMO centers in France and Italy. Patients with ARDS on ECMO and successfully weaned from VV ECMO were classified based on their mechanical ventilation modality during the sweep gas-off trial (SGOT) with either controlled mechanical ventilation or spontaneous breathing (i.e. pressure support ventilation). The primary endpoint was the time to successful weaning from mechanical ventilation within 90 days post-ECMO weaning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>292 adult patients with severe ARDS were weaned from controlled ventilation, and 101 were on spontaneous breathing during SGOT. The 90-day probability of successful weaning from mechanical ventilation was not significantly different between the two groups (sHR [95% CI], 1.23 [0.84-1.82]). ECMO-related complications were not statistically different between patients receiving these two mechanical ventilation strategies. After adjusting for covariates, older age, higher pre-ECMO sequential organ failure assessment score, pneumothorax, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and renal replacement therapy, but not mechanical ventilation modalities during SGOT, were independently associated with a lower probability of successful weaning from mechanical ventilation after ECMO weaning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Time to successful weaning from mechanical ventilation within 90 days post-ECMO was not associated with the mechanical ventilation strategy used during SGOT. Further research is needed to assess the optimal ventilation strategy during weaning off VV ECMO and its impact on short- and long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11374948/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-024-01359-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The optimal timing of weaning from venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) and its modalities have been rarely studied.

Methods: Retrospective, multicenter cohort study over 7 years in two tertiary ICUs, high-volume ECMO centers in France and Italy. Patients with ARDS on ECMO and successfully weaned from VV ECMO were classified based on their mechanical ventilation modality during the sweep gas-off trial (SGOT) with either controlled mechanical ventilation or spontaneous breathing (i.e. pressure support ventilation). The primary endpoint was the time to successful weaning from mechanical ventilation within 90 days post-ECMO weaning.

Results: 292 adult patients with severe ARDS were weaned from controlled ventilation, and 101 were on spontaneous breathing during SGOT. The 90-day probability of successful weaning from mechanical ventilation was not significantly different between the two groups (sHR [95% CI], 1.23 [0.84-1.82]). ECMO-related complications were not statistically different between patients receiving these two mechanical ventilation strategies. After adjusting for covariates, older age, higher pre-ECMO sequential organ failure assessment score, pneumothorax, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and renal replacement therapy, but not mechanical ventilation modalities during SGOT, were independently associated with a lower probability of successful weaning from mechanical ventilation after ECMO weaning.

Conclusions: Time to successful weaning from mechanical ventilation within 90 days post-ECMO was not associated with the mechanical ventilation strategy used during SGOT. Further research is needed to assess the optimal ventilation strategy during weaning off VV ECMO and its impact on short- and long-term outcomes.

Abstract Image

静脉体外膜肺氧合断流期间的机械通气设置。
背景:关于静脉体外膜肺氧合(VV ECMO)断流的最佳时机及其方式的研究很少:方法: 在法国和意大利的两家三级重症监护病房、高容量 ECMO 中心进行了为期 7 年的回顾性多中心队列研究。根据患者在扫气试验(SGOT)期间的机械通气方式(控制机械通气或自主呼吸(即压力支持通气)),对使用 ECMO 并成功从 VV ECMO 断流的 ARDS 患者进行分类。结果:292 名重症 ARDS 成人患者从控制通气中断气,101 名患者在 SGOT 期间进行自主呼吸。两组患者 90 天内成功脱离机械通气的概率无显著差异(sHR [95% CI],1.23 [0.84-1.82])。接受这两种机械通气策略的患者在 ECMO 相关并发症方面没有统计学差异。在对协变量进行调整后,年龄较大、ECMO 前序贯器官衰竭评估评分较高、气胸、呼吸机相关肺炎和肾脏替代治疗(而非 SGOT 期间的机械通气模式)与 ECMO 断流后机械通气成功断流的概率较低独立相关:结论:ECMO术后90天内成功脱离机械通气的时间与SGOT期间使用的机械通气策略无关。需要进一步研究评估 VV ECMO 断流期间的最佳通气策略及其对短期和长期预后的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信