Since the COVID-19 pandemic, approximately 90% of elective anesthetics have been ambulatory: A retrospective analysis of statewide data in Florida from 2010 through 2022

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
{"title":"Since the COVID-19 pandemic, approximately 90% of elective anesthetics have been ambulatory: A retrospective analysis of statewide data in Florida from 2010 through 2022","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>When the vast majority (e.g., ≈90%) of a specialty's elective (scheduled) care is ambulatory (i.e., length of stay 0 or 1 night), the administrative, clinical, and economic policy implications are profound. We examined the progressive shift of elective anesthetics in Florida from inpatient to ambulatory, from the first quarter of 2010 through the fourth quarter of 2022. We were particularly interested in the most recent data following the lifting of COVID-19 restrictions on elective surgery in the state.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective cohort study included major therapeutic and major diagnostic procedures with &gt;0 American Society of Anesthesiologists base units in the state of Florida inpatient and ambulatory surgery databases. The last 8 quarters of these operating room anesthetic data corresponded to the end of restrictions on elective surgery in Florida due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our goal was to determine whether the overall mean percentage of cases with 0- or 1-day lengths of stay has reached 90% since the lifting of pandemic restrictions. Numbers of cases over periods of at least four weeks tend to follow normal distributions. Therefore, we analyzed the <em>N</em> = 8 quarters of cases from 2021 to 2022 using Student's <em>t</em>-test. The study was performed when there were N = 8 quarters available from the Florida healthcare databases.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were overall 22,584,752 surgical cases studied. The percentages of elective anesthetics with length of stay ≤1-day increased progressively from 2010 through 2020. Among the eight successive quarters since the end of pandemic-related elective surgery restrictions, the percentage of elective cases with length of stay 0- or 1 day was stable, averaging 90% (95% two-sided confidence interval 89.4% to 90.3%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Since the COVID-19 pandemic, the mean quarterly percentage of elective surgery cases with anesthesia in Florida that were ambulatory has been reliably ≈90%. Implications include value in expecting overnight post-anesthesia care unit stay in ambulatory surgery centers and scheduling and sequencing cases based on post-anesthesia care unit capacity. Furthermore, because the vast majority (i.e., ≈90%) of cases would be excluded (i.e., not involve hospital admission for at least 2 midnights), there is a minimal role that risk-adjusted hospital length of stay and mortality can have in evaluating anesthesia department overall quality and economic effectiveness.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818024002253","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

When the vast majority (e.g., ≈90%) of a specialty's elective (scheduled) care is ambulatory (i.e., length of stay 0 or 1 night), the administrative, clinical, and economic policy implications are profound. We examined the progressive shift of elective anesthetics in Florida from inpatient to ambulatory, from the first quarter of 2010 through the fourth quarter of 2022. We were particularly interested in the most recent data following the lifting of COVID-19 restrictions on elective surgery in the state.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included major therapeutic and major diagnostic procedures with >0 American Society of Anesthesiologists base units in the state of Florida inpatient and ambulatory surgery databases. The last 8 quarters of these operating room anesthetic data corresponded to the end of restrictions on elective surgery in Florida due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our goal was to determine whether the overall mean percentage of cases with 0- or 1-day lengths of stay has reached 90% since the lifting of pandemic restrictions. Numbers of cases over periods of at least four weeks tend to follow normal distributions. Therefore, we analyzed the N = 8 quarters of cases from 2021 to 2022 using Student's t-test. The study was performed when there were N = 8 quarters available from the Florida healthcare databases.

Results

There were overall 22,584,752 surgical cases studied. The percentages of elective anesthetics with length of stay ≤1-day increased progressively from 2010 through 2020. Among the eight successive quarters since the end of pandemic-related elective surgery restrictions, the percentage of elective cases with length of stay 0- or 1 day was stable, averaging 90% (95% two-sided confidence interval 89.4% to 90.3%).

Conclusion

Since the COVID-19 pandemic, the mean quarterly percentage of elective surgery cases with anesthesia in Florida that were ambulatory has been reliably ≈90%. Implications include value in expecting overnight post-anesthesia care unit stay in ambulatory surgery centers and scheduling and sequencing cases based on post-anesthesia care unit capacity. Furthermore, because the vast majority (i.e., ≈90%) of cases would be excluded (i.e., not involve hospital admission for at least 2 midnights), there is a minimal role that risk-adjusted hospital length of stay and mortality can have in evaluating anesthesia department overall quality and economic effectiveness.

自 COVID-19 大流行以来,约 90% 的选择性麻醉都是非卧床麻醉:对 2010 年至 2022 年佛罗里达州全州数据的回顾性分析
背景当一个专科的绝大多数(例如,≈90%)择期(预定)治疗都是非住院治疗(即住院时间为 0 或 1 晚)时,其行政、临床和经济政策的影响是深远的。我们研究了从 2010 年第一季度到 2022 年第四季度佛罗里达州选择性麻醉从住院治疗到非住院治疗的逐步转变。我们对该州取消 COVID-19 对择期手术限制后的最新数据尤为感兴趣。方法这项回顾性队列研究纳入了佛罗里达州住院和非住院手术数据库中美国麻醉医师协会(American Society of Anesthesiologists)基地单位的主要治疗和主要诊断手术。这些手术室麻醉数据的最后 8 个季度与 COVID-19 大流行导致的佛罗里达州选择性手术限制的结束时间一致。我们的目标是确定自取消大流行限制以来,住院时间为 0 天或 1 天的病例的总体平均比例是否已达到 90%。至少四周的病例数往往呈正态分布。因此,我们使用学生 t 检验法分析了 2021 年至 2022 年 N = 8 个季度的病例数。这项研究是在佛罗里达州医疗数据库中有 N = 8 个季度的情况下进行的。结果研究的手术病例总数为 22,584,752 例。从 2010 年到 2020 年,住院时间≤1 天的选择性麻醉比例逐渐增加。结论自 COVID-19 大流行以来,佛罗里达州麻醉时间为 0 天或 1 天的非住院择期手术病例的平均季度百分比一直稳定在 90% 以上(95% 的双侧置信区间为 89.4% 至 90.3%)。这意味着在非卧床手术中心预计麻醉后护理病房过夜以及根据麻醉后护理病房的容量安排和排序病例的价值。此外,由于绝大多数病例(即≈90%)将被排除在外(即至少有两个午夜不涉及住院),因此风险调整后的住院时间和死亡率在评估麻醉部门整体质量和经济效益方面的作用微乎其微。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained. The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信