Eye tracking measures of bicyclists’ behavior and perception: A systematic review

IF 3.5 2区工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED

Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2024.08.026

Shiyu Ma, Wenwen Zhang, Robert B. Noland, Clinton J. Andrews

{"title":"Eye tracking measures of bicyclists’ behavior and perception: A systematic review","authors":"Shiyu Ma, Wenwen Zhang, Robert B. Noland, Clinton J. Andrews","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.08.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With improved portability and affordability, eye tracking devices have facilitated an expanding range of cycling experiments aimed at understanding cycling behavior and potential risks. Given the complexity of cyclists’ visual behavior and gaze measurements, we provide a comprehensive review with three key focuses: 1) the adoption and interpretation of various gaze metrics derived from cycling experiments, 2) a summary of the findings of those experiments, and 3) identifying areas for future research. A systematic review of three databases yielded thirty-five articles that met our inclusion criteria. Our review results show that cycling experiments with eye tracking allow analysis of the viewpoint of the cyclist and reactions to the built environment, road conditions, navigation behavior, and mental workload and/or stress levels. Our review suggests substantial variation in research objectives and the consequent selection of eye-tracking devices, experimental design, and which gaze metrics are used and interpreted. A variety of general gaze metrics and gaze measurements related to Areas of Interest (AOI) are applied to infer cyclists’ mental workload/stress levels and attention allocation respectively. The diversity of gaze metrics reported in the literature makes cross-study comparisons difficult. Areas for future research, especially potential integration with computer vision are also discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"107 ","pages":"Pages 52-68"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136984782400233X/pdfft?md5=29db3bc011d61c69670416cd89c796be&pid=1-s2.0-S136984782400233X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136984782400233X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

With improved portability and affordability, eye tracking devices have facilitated an expanding range of cycling experiments aimed at understanding cycling behavior and potential risks. Given the complexity of cyclists’ visual behavior and gaze measurements, we provide a comprehensive review with three key focuses: 1) the adoption and interpretation of various gaze metrics derived from cycling experiments, 2) a summary of the findings of those experiments, and 3) identifying areas for future research. A systematic review of three databases yielded thirty-five articles that met our inclusion criteria. Our review results show that cycling experiments with eye tracking allow analysis of the viewpoint of the cyclist and reactions to the built environment, road conditions, navigation behavior, and mental workload and/or stress levels. Our review suggests substantial variation in research objectives and the consequent selection of eye-tracking devices, experimental design, and which gaze metrics are used and interpreted. A variety of general gaze metrics and gaze measurements related to Areas of Interest (AOI) are applied to infer cyclists’ mental workload/stress levels and attention allocation respectively. The diversity of gaze metrics reported in the literature makes cross-study comparisons difficult. Areas for future research, especially potential integration with computer vision are also discussed.

查看原文本刊更多论文

对骑自行车者的行为和感知进行眼动跟踪测量：系统回顾

随着便携性和经济性的提高，眼动仪促进了旨在了解骑车行为和潜在风险的骑车实验范围的不断扩大。鉴于骑车人的视觉行为和注视测量的复杂性，我们提供了一个全面的综述，其中有三个重点：1）采用和解释从骑车实验中得出的各种注视指标；2）总结这些实验的发现；3）确定未来研究的领域。通过对三个数据库的系统性审查，有 35 篇文章符合我们的纳入标准。我们的综述结果表明，利用眼动仪进行的骑车实验可以分析骑车人的视角以及对建筑环境、路况、导航行为、心理工作量和/或压力水平的反应。我们的研究结果表明，在研究目标、眼球跟踪设备的选择、实验设计以及凝视指标的使用和解释方面存在很大差异。各种通用的注视指标和与兴趣区（AOI）相关的注视测量分别用于推断骑车者的心理工作量/压力水平和注意力分配。文献中报道的注视指标多种多样，因此很难进行跨研究比较。此外，还讨论了未来的研究领域，特别是与计算机视觉整合的可能性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour Multiple-

CiteScore

7.60

自引率

14.60%

发文量

239

审稿时长

71 days

期刊介绍： Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.