Transition of Physical, Psychological, and Cognitive Frailty and Its' Associated Determinants in Malaysian Older Adults: A 5-Year Follow-up Study.

Pavapriya Ponvel, Resshaya Roobini Murukesu, Suzana Shahar, Nurul Fatin Malek Rivan, Ponnusamy Subramaniam, Devinder Kaur Ajit Singh
{"title":"Transition of Physical, Psychological, and Cognitive Frailty and Its' Associated Determinants in Malaysian Older Adults: A 5-Year Follow-up Study.","authors":"Pavapriya Ponvel, Resshaya Roobini Murukesu, Suzana Shahar, Nurul Fatin Malek Rivan, Ponnusamy Subramaniam, Devinder Kaur Ajit Singh","doi":"10.1089/rej.2024.0047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Frailty, a multifaceted syndrome, affects approximately 26% of older adults globally, yet there are limited data on the prevalence and longitudinal impact of frailty subtypes. Therefore, in this study, we aim to determine the prevalence of physical, psychological, and cognitive frailty, transitions between subtypes, and associated health determinants among Malaysian community-dwelling older adults. This study is part of the longitudinal aging study in Malaysia (LRGS Ageless and TUA). We assessed 815 older adults in 2014, with successful follow-up of 402 participants (mean age: 67.08 ± 5.38 years) after 5 years. Frailty subtypes were assessed at baseline, and transitions were evaluated at the 5-year mark. At baseline, the prevalence of older adults categorized as robust, physical frailty, cognitive frailty, and psychological frailty was 26.7%, 36.3%, 12.1%, and 16.7%, respectively, with 8.1% exhibiting concurrent psychological and cognitive frailty. Follow-up results showed that 22.9% remained robust, 46.8% experienced no change, 24.9% deteriorated (adversed), and 5.5% improved (reversed). Logistic regression analysis identified living alone (<i>p</i> < 0.001), increased body fat percentage (<i>p</i> < 0.05), increased waist circumference (<i>p</i> < 0.05), reduced fat-free mass (<i>p</i> < 0.05), decreased lower limb flexibility (<i>p</i> < 0.05), and declined cardiorespiratory fitness (<i>p</i> < 0.05) as significant predictors of frailty deterioration. Higher Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores and improved Timed Up and Go and Chair Stand test results (<i>p</i> < 0.05) were significantly associated with the reversal of frailty subtypes (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Younger older adults (<i>p</i> < 0.001), males (<i>p</i> < 0.05), those with lower WHO Disability Scale scores (<i>p</i> < 0.05), and higher MMSE scores (<i>p</i> < 0.05) were significantly less likely to develop frailty subtypes. Intervention strategies that focus on combined physical, cognitive, and psychosocial functions are crucial for both reversing and preventing the progression of frailty subtypes in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":94189,"journal":{"name":"Rejuvenation research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rejuvenation research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/rej.2024.0047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Frailty, a multifaceted syndrome, affects approximately 26% of older adults globally, yet there are limited data on the prevalence and longitudinal impact of frailty subtypes. Therefore, in this study, we aim to determine the prevalence of physical, psychological, and cognitive frailty, transitions between subtypes, and associated health determinants among Malaysian community-dwelling older adults. This study is part of the longitudinal aging study in Malaysia (LRGS Ageless and TUA). We assessed 815 older adults in 2014, with successful follow-up of 402 participants (mean age: 67.08 ± 5.38 years) after 5 years. Frailty subtypes were assessed at baseline, and transitions were evaluated at the 5-year mark. At baseline, the prevalence of older adults categorized as robust, physical frailty, cognitive frailty, and psychological frailty was 26.7%, 36.3%, 12.1%, and 16.7%, respectively, with 8.1% exhibiting concurrent psychological and cognitive frailty. Follow-up results showed that 22.9% remained robust, 46.8% experienced no change, 24.9% deteriorated (adversed), and 5.5% improved (reversed). Logistic regression analysis identified living alone (p < 0.001), increased body fat percentage (p < 0.05), increased waist circumference (p < 0.05), reduced fat-free mass (p < 0.05), decreased lower limb flexibility (p < 0.05), and declined cardiorespiratory fitness (p < 0.05) as significant predictors of frailty deterioration. Higher Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores and improved Timed Up and Go and Chair Stand test results (p < 0.05) were significantly associated with the reversal of frailty subtypes (p < 0.05). Younger older adults (p < 0.001), males (p < 0.05), those with lower WHO Disability Scale scores (p < 0.05), and higher MMSE scores (p < 0.05) were significantly less likely to develop frailty subtypes. Intervention strategies that focus on combined physical, cognitive, and psychosocial functions are crucial for both reversing and preventing the progression of frailty subtypes in older adults.

马来西亚老年人身体、心理和认知虚弱的转变及其相关决定因素:一项为期 5 年的跟踪研究。
导言:虚弱是一种多方面的综合征,影响着全球约 26% 的老年人,但有关虚弱亚型的患病率和纵向影响的数据却很有限。因此,在本研究中,我们旨在确定马来西亚社区老年人身体、心理和认知虚弱的患病率、亚型之间的转变以及相关的健康决定因素:本研究是马来西亚老龄化纵向研究(LRGS Ageless and TUA)的一部分。我们在 2014 年对 815 名老年人进行了评估,并在 5 年后成功随访了 402 名参与者(平均年龄:67.08±5.38 岁)。在基线时评估了虚弱亚型,并在 5 年后评估了过渡情况:基线时,被归类为体格健壮、身体虚弱、认知虚弱和心理虚弱的老年人分别占 26.7%、36.3%、12.1% 和 16.7%,其中 8.1% 的老年人同时表现出心理和认知虚弱。随访结果显示,22.9%的人保持健康,46.8%的人没有变化,24.9%的人病情恶化(逆转),5.5%的人病情好转(逆转)。逻辑回归分析表明,独居(p结论:重点关注身体、认知和社会心理综合功能的干预策略对于逆转和预防老年人虚弱亚型的发展至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信