Comparative analysis of codon usage bias in the chloroplast genomes of eighteen Ampelopsideae species (Vitaceae).

IF 1.9 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Qun Hu, Jiaqi Wu, Chengcheng Fan, Yongjian Luo, Jun Liu, Zhijun Deng, Qing Li
{"title":"Comparative analysis of codon usage bias in the chloroplast genomes of eighteen Ampelopsideae species (Vitaceae).","authors":"Qun Hu, Jiaqi Wu, Chengcheng Fan, Yongjian Luo, Jun Liu, Zhijun Deng, Qing Li","doi":"10.1186/s12863-024-01260-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The tribe Ampelopsideae plants are important garden plants with both medicinal and ornamental values. The study of codon usage bias (CUB) facilitates a deeper comprehension of the molecular genetic evolution of species and their adaptive strategies. The joint analysis of CUB in chloroplast genomes (cpDNA) offers valuable insights for in-depth research on molecular genetic evolution, biological resource conservation, and elite breeding within this plant family.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The base composition and codon usage preferences of the eighteen chloroplast genomes were highly similar, with the GC content of bases at all positions of their codons being less than 50%. This indicates that they preferred A/T bases. Their effective codon numbers were all in the range of 35-61, which indicates that the codon preferences of the chloroplast genomes of the 18 Ampelopsideae plants were relatively weak. A series of analyses indicated that the codon preference of the chloroplast genomes of the 18 Ampelopsideae plants was influenced by a combination of multiple factors, with natural selection being the primary influence. The clustering tree generated based on the relative usage of synonymous codons is consistent with some of the results obtained from the phylogenetic tree of chloroplast genomes, which indicates that the clustering tree based on the relative usage of synonymous codons can be an important supplement to the results of the sequence-based phylogenetic analysis. Eventually, 10 shared best codons were screened on the basis of the chloroplast genomes of 18 species.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The codon preferences of the chloroplast genome in Ampelopsideae plants are relatively weak and are primarily influenced by natural selection. The codon composition of the chloroplast genomes of the eighteen Ampelopsideae plants and their usage preferences were sufficiently similar to demonstrate that the chloroplast genomes of Ampelopsideae plants are highly conserved. This study provides a scientific basis for the genetic evolution of chloroplast genes in Ampelopsideae species and their suitable strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":72427,"journal":{"name":"BMC genomic data","volume":"25 1","pages":"80"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11370015/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC genomic data","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-024-01260-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The tribe Ampelopsideae plants are important garden plants with both medicinal and ornamental values. The study of codon usage bias (CUB) facilitates a deeper comprehension of the molecular genetic evolution of species and their adaptive strategies. The joint analysis of CUB in chloroplast genomes (cpDNA) offers valuable insights for in-depth research on molecular genetic evolution, biological resource conservation, and elite breeding within this plant family.

Results: The base composition and codon usage preferences of the eighteen chloroplast genomes were highly similar, with the GC content of bases at all positions of their codons being less than 50%. This indicates that they preferred A/T bases. Their effective codon numbers were all in the range of 35-61, which indicates that the codon preferences of the chloroplast genomes of the 18 Ampelopsideae plants were relatively weak. A series of analyses indicated that the codon preference of the chloroplast genomes of the 18 Ampelopsideae plants was influenced by a combination of multiple factors, with natural selection being the primary influence. The clustering tree generated based on the relative usage of synonymous codons is consistent with some of the results obtained from the phylogenetic tree of chloroplast genomes, which indicates that the clustering tree based on the relative usage of synonymous codons can be an important supplement to the results of the sequence-based phylogenetic analysis. Eventually, 10 shared best codons were screened on the basis of the chloroplast genomes of 18 species.

Conclusion: The codon preferences of the chloroplast genome in Ampelopsideae plants are relatively weak and are primarily influenced by natural selection. The codon composition of the chloroplast genomes of the eighteen Ampelopsideae plants and their usage preferences were sufficiently similar to demonstrate that the chloroplast genomes of Ampelopsideae plants are highly conserved. This study provides a scientific basis for the genetic evolution of chloroplast genes in Ampelopsideae species and their suitable strategies.

十八个葡萄科(Ampelopsideae)物种叶绿体基因组中密码子使用偏差的比较分析。
背景介绍天南星科植物是重要的园林植物,具有药用和观赏价值。对密码子使用偏倚(CUB)的研究有助于深入理解物种的分子遗传进化及其适应策略。联合分析叶绿体基因组(cpDNA)中的 CUB 为深入研究该植物家族的分子遗传进化、生物资源保护和精英育种提供了宝贵的见解:结果:18 个叶绿体基因组的碱基组成和密码子使用偏好高度相似,其密码子所有位置的碱基 GC 含量均低于 50%。这表明它们偏好 A/T 碱基。它们的有效密码子数都在 35-61 之间,这表明 18 种羊足纲植物叶绿体基因组的密码子偏好相对较弱。一系列分析表明,18 种羊胎科植物叶绿体基因组的密码子偏好受到多种因素的综合影响,其中自然选择是最主要的影响因素。基于同义密码子相对使用率生成的聚类树与叶绿体基因组系统进化树的部分结果一致,这表明基于同义密码子相对使用率的聚类树可以作为基于序列的系统进化分析结果的重要补充。最终,在 18 个物种叶绿体基因组的基础上筛选出了 10 个共同的最佳密码子:结论:安培植物叶绿体基因组的密码子偏好相对较弱,主要受自然选择的影响。18种羊胎科植物叶绿体基因组的密码子组成及其使用偏好具有足够的相似性,表明羊胎科植物叶绿体基因组具有高度的保守性。这项研究为安培拟叶植物叶绿体基因的遗传进化及其适宜策略提供了科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信