Exploring what influences physiotherapists' capability, opportunity and motivation to integrate new evidence into routine clinical care using the Balance Intensity Scale.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Disability and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1080/09638288.2024.2396059
Hannah L Ross, Sarah C Milne, Abby M Foster, Elizabeth Dalla Santa, Karyn Grehan, Melanie K Farlie
{"title":"Exploring what influences physiotherapists' capability, opportunity and motivation to integrate new evidence into routine clinical care using the Balance Intensity Scale.","authors":"Hannah L Ross, Sarah C Milne, Abby M Foster, Elizabeth Dalla Santa, Karyn Grehan, Melanie K Farlie","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2024.2396059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore influences on the capability, opportunity and motivation of physiotherapists integrating new evidence into routine care.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Mixed-methods study utilising the Theoretical Domains Framework and Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behaviour model. Metropolitan inpatient rehabilitation physiotherapists participated by integrating the Balance Intensity Scale into routine care for 6 weeks. Evidence integration was supported by a tailored theory-informed approach. Participants completed pre- and post-evidence integration surveys and a post-evidence integration focus group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre- and post-surveys were completed by 24 and 12 participants, respectively. One focus group (<i>n</i> = 7) was conducted. Framework analysis identified themes in Capability (<i>n</i> = 4), Opportunity (<i>n</i> = 4) and Motivation (<i>n</i> = 5) domains influencing behaviour when implementing new evidence. The evidence integration process enhanced participants' Knowledge (<i>p</i> = 0.04), Skills (<i>p</i> = 0.003) and Belief in capabilities (<i>p</i> = 0.03) when prescribing and measuring balance exercises.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified perceived barriers and enablers to evidence integration of a new outcome measure into routine care. It highlights strategies that may support physiotherapy teams in incorporating new evidence into routine care. These strategies include education on the evidence being implemented, physical resources, change champions to facilitate social support, management endorsement, and recognition of the time and effort required for evidence integration in the short term.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"2543-2556"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2024.2396059","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To explore influences on the capability, opportunity and motivation of physiotherapists integrating new evidence into routine care.

Materials and methods: Mixed-methods study utilising the Theoretical Domains Framework and Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behaviour model. Metropolitan inpatient rehabilitation physiotherapists participated by integrating the Balance Intensity Scale into routine care for 6 weeks. Evidence integration was supported by a tailored theory-informed approach. Participants completed pre- and post-evidence integration surveys and a post-evidence integration focus group.

Results: Pre- and post-surveys were completed by 24 and 12 participants, respectively. One focus group (n = 7) was conducted. Framework analysis identified themes in Capability (n = 4), Opportunity (n = 4) and Motivation (n = 5) domains influencing behaviour when implementing new evidence. The evidence integration process enhanced participants' Knowledge (p = 0.04), Skills (p = 0.003) and Belief in capabilities (p = 0.03) when prescribing and measuring balance exercises.

Conclusions: This study identified perceived barriers and enablers to evidence integration of a new outcome measure into routine care. It highlights strategies that may support physiotherapy teams in incorporating new evidence into routine care. These strategies include education on the evidence being implemented, physical resources, change champions to facilitate social support, management endorsement, and recognition of the time and effort required for evidence integration in the short term.

利用平衡强度量表,探索影响物理治疗师将新证据纳入常规临床护理的能力、机会和动机的因素。
目的:探讨物理治疗师将新证据纳入常规护理的能力、机会和动机的影响因素:采用理论领域框架和能力-机会-动机-行为模型进行混合方法研究。大都市的住院康复理疗师参与了这项研究,他们将平衡强度量表融入到常规护理中,为期 6 周。证据整合得到了量身定制的理论方法的支持。参与者填写了证据整合前后的调查问卷,并参加了证据整合后的焦点小组:结果:分别有 24 名和 12 名参与者完成了前后调查。进行了一次焦点小组讨论(n = 7)。框架分析确定了影响实施新证据行为的能力(n = 4)、机会(n = 4)和动机(n = 5)领域的主题。在处方和测量平衡练习时,证据整合过程增强了参与者的知识(p = 0.04)、技能(p = 0.003)和能力信念(p = 0.03):本研究确定了将新的结果测量纳入常规护理的障碍和促进因素。它强调了可支持物理治疗团队将新证据纳入常规护理的策略。这些策略包括关于正在实施的证据的教育、物质资源、促进社会支持的变革倡导者、管理层的认可以及认识到短期内证据整合所需的时间和精力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信