SMSs as an alternative to provider-delivered care for unhealthy alcohol use: study protocol for Leseli, an open-label randomised controlled trial of mhGAP-Remote vs mhGAP-Standard in Lesotho.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Trials Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1186/s13063-024-08411-3
Jennifer M Belus, Natalie E Johnson, Grace H Yoon, Nadine Tschumi, Malebanye Lerotholi, Irene Falgas-Bague, Tristan T Lee, Pearl Letsoela, Jessica F Magidson, Alain Amstutz, Niklaus D Labhardt
{"title":"SMSs as an alternative to provider-delivered care for unhealthy alcohol use: study protocol for Leseli, an open-label randomised controlled trial of mhGAP-Remote vs mhGAP-Standard in Lesotho.","authors":"Jennifer M Belus, Natalie E Johnson, Grace H Yoon, Nadine Tschumi, Malebanye Lerotholi, Irene Falgas-Bague, Tristan T Lee, Pearl Letsoela, Jessica F Magidson, Alain Amstutz, Niklaus D Labhardt","doi":"10.1186/s13063-024-08411-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The World Health Organization's (WHO) Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) is a validated intervention that can be provided by non-specialised healthcare workers to individuals with unhealthy alcohol use. However, it typically requires several in-person sessions at a health facility, which may limit its feasibility and effectiveness in remote settings. This trial compares mhGAP-Standard, a 4 to 6 in-person session intervention, to mhGAP-Remote, a 1 in-person session intervention followed by 8 week of short message service (SMS) in Lesotho. We hypothesise that mhGAP-Remote is superior to mhGAP-Standard in reducing alcohol use (as detailed by the primary and secondary outcomes below).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a two-arm randomised open-label multicentre superiority trial. Participants allocated to mhGAP-Standard receive 4 in-person sessions using motivational interviewing, identifying triggers, and alternative behaviours, with the option of two additional booster sessions. Participants in the mhGAP-Remote arm receive 1 in-person session covering the same content, followed by standardised SMSs over 8 weeks that reinforce intervention content. Non-specialist providers deliver the intervention and receive weekly supervision. Adults (N<sub>planned</sub> = 248) attending participating health facilities for any reason and who meet criteria for unhealthy alcohol use based on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test ([AUDIT] score ≥ 6 for women, ≥ 8 for men) are individually randomised to the two arms (1:1 allocation, stratified by participant sex and age (≥ 50 vs < 50 years old). Follow-up assessments occur at 8, 20, and 32 weeks post-randomisation. The primary outcome is change in self-reported alcohol use (continuous AUDIT score), from baseline to 8 weeks follow-up. Change in the AUDIT from baseline to 20 and 32 weeks follow-up is a secondary outcome. Change in the biomarker phosphatidylethanol (secondary), liver enzyme values in serum (exploratory), and HIV viral load (for people with HIV only; exploratory) are also evaluated from baseline throughout the entire follow-up period. A linear regression model will be conducted for the primary analysis, adjusted for the stratification factors. Three a priori sensitivity analyses for the primary outcome are planned based on per protocol treatment attendance, recovery from unhealthy alcohol use, and clinically significant and reliable change.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This trial will provide insight into feasibility and effectiveness of a shortened and primarily SMS supported version of mhGAP, which is especially relevant for settings where regular clinic attendance is a major barrier.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>clinicaltrials.gov NCT05925270 . Approved on June 29th, 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11368011/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08411-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization's (WHO) Mental Health Gap Action Programme (mhGAP) is a validated intervention that can be provided by non-specialised healthcare workers to individuals with unhealthy alcohol use. However, it typically requires several in-person sessions at a health facility, which may limit its feasibility and effectiveness in remote settings. This trial compares mhGAP-Standard, a 4 to 6 in-person session intervention, to mhGAP-Remote, a 1 in-person session intervention followed by 8 week of short message service (SMS) in Lesotho. We hypothesise that mhGAP-Remote is superior to mhGAP-Standard in reducing alcohol use (as detailed by the primary and secondary outcomes below).

Methods: This is a two-arm randomised open-label multicentre superiority trial. Participants allocated to mhGAP-Standard receive 4 in-person sessions using motivational interviewing, identifying triggers, and alternative behaviours, with the option of two additional booster sessions. Participants in the mhGAP-Remote arm receive 1 in-person session covering the same content, followed by standardised SMSs over 8 weeks that reinforce intervention content. Non-specialist providers deliver the intervention and receive weekly supervision. Adults (Nplanned = 248) attending participating health facilities for any reason and who meet criteria for unhealthy alcohol use based on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test ([AUDIT] score ≥ 6 for women, ≥ 8 for men) are individually randomised to the two arms (1:1 allocation, stratified by participant sex and age (≥ 50 vs < 50 years old). Follow-up assessments occur at 8, 20, and 32 weeks post-randomisation. The primary outcome is change in self-reported alcohol use (continuous AUDIT score), from baseline to 8 weeks follow-up. Change in the AUDIT from baseline to 20 and 32 weeks follow-up is a secondary outcome. Change in the biomarker phosphatidylethanol (secondary), liver enzyme values in serum (exploratory), and HIV viral load (for people with HIV only; exploratory) are also evaluated from baseline throughout the entire follow-up period. A linear regression model will be conducted for the primary analysis, adjusted for the stratification factors. Three a priori sensitivity analyses for the primary outcome are planned based on per protocol treatment attendance, recovery from unhealthy alcohol use, and clinically significant and reliable change.

Discussion: This trial will provide insight into feasibility and effectiveness of a shortened and primarily SMS supported version of mhGAP, which is especially relevant for settings where regular clinic attendance is a major barrier.

Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT05925270 . Approved on June 29th, 2023.

在莱索托,mhGAP-Remote 与 mhGAP-Standard 的开放标签随机对照试验 "Leseli "的研究方案。
背景:世界卫生组织(WHO)的 "心理健康差距行动方案"(mhGAP)是一项经过验证的干预措施,可由非专业医护人员向不健康饮酒者提供。然而,它通常需要在医疗机构进行多次面对面的治疗,这可能会限制其在偏远地区的可行性和有效性。本试验对莱索托的 mhGAP-Standard(4-6 次亲临现场干预)和 mhGAP-Remote(1 次亲临现场干预,然后进行为期 8 周的短信服务)进行了比较。我们假设 mhGAP-Remote 在减少酒精使用方面优于 mhGAP-Standard(详见下文的主要和次要结果):这是一项双臂随机开放标签多中心优效试验。被分配到 mhGAP-Standard 的参与者将接受 4 次面谈,内容包括动机访谈、识别诱因和替代行为,并可选择参加另外两次强化课程。mhGAP-Remote 治疗组的参与者将接受一次涵盖相同内容的面对面治疗,然后在 8 周内通过标准化短信强化干预内容。非专业医疗服务提供者提供干预服务并每周接受监督。因任何原因到参与试验的医疗机构就诊、根据酒精使用障碍鉴定测试(女性≥6 分,男性≥8 分)符合不健康饮酒标准的成年人(计划人数 = 248 人)将被单独随机分配到两个干预组(1:1 分配,按参与者性别和年龄分层(≥50 vs 讨论)):该试验将有助于深入了解缩短版、主要由短信支持的 mhGAP 的可行性和有效性,这与定期就诊成为主要障碍的环境尤为相关。试验注册:clinicaltrials.gov NCT05925270 。2023 年 6 月 29 日批准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信