Role of Acetazolamide in Traumatic CSF Rhinorrhea and Otorrhea: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Asian journal of neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-06-21 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1787090
Shivam Madeshiya, Chhitij Srivastava, Bal Krishan Ojha, Anil Chandra, Somil Jaiswal, Ankur Bajaj, Awadesh Yadav
{"title":"Role of Acetazolamide in Traumatic CSF Rhinorrhea and Otorrhea: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Shivam Madeshiya, Chhitij Srivastava, Bal Krishan Ojha, Anil Chandra, Somil Jaiswal, Ankur Bajaj, Awadesh Yadav","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1787090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>  Untreated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea and otorrhea can lead to adverse complications like meningitis and hence should not be overlooked. Acetazolamide reduces CSF production by 48%. The actual role of acetazolamide in the amelioration of traumatic CSF rhinorrhea and otorrhea is not clear as, till date, very few formal studies have been conducted. Aim of the study was to determine the role of acetazolamide in traumatic cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea and otorrhea. <b>Materials and Methods</b>  A randomized controlled trial was conducted among 134 patients with head injuries presenting to the neurosurgery department of a tertiary care center in North India, with complaints of CSF rhinorrhea and otorrhea within 72 hours of traumatic injury. One-hundred thirty-four patients were randomized into intervention and control group. Comparative analysis was not possible in 58 patients as in due course they were either operated for head injury or lumbar drain was put due to excessive CSF leak; hence, forth comparative analysis was done in 76 patients. Out of these 76 patients, 44 patients belonged to the intervention group (Acetazolamide given) and 32 belong to the control group (Acetazolamide not given). The day of the stoppage of CSF Leak was the main endpoint of this study. <b>Result</b>  Majority of the patients were in the age group of 21 to 30 years and were predominantly males. Road traffic accident was observed in 84 (75%) patients. There was no statistically significant difference noted in the mean number of days of CSF leak whether acetazolamide was given or not ( <i>p</i>  = 0.344). The complication associated with CSF leak was meningitis. The percentage of patients developing meningitis was more after lumber drain insertion. <b>Conclusion</b>  In our study, there was no advantage of adding acetazolamide to the conservative management of traumatic CSF leak. Therefore, the practice of routinely giving acetazolamide should be reconsidered.</p>","PeriodicalId":94300,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11349410/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background  Untreated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea and otorrhea can lead to adverse complications like meningitis and hence should not be overlooked. Acetazolamide reduces CSF production by 48%. The actual role of acetazolamide in the amelioration of traumatic CSF rhinorrhea and otorrhea is not clear as, till date, very few formal studies have been conducted. Aim of the study was to determine the role of acetazolamide in traumatic cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea and otorrhea. Materials and Methods  A randomized controlled trial was conducted among 134 patients with head injuries presenting to the neurosurgery department of a tertiary care center in North India, with complaints of CSF rhinorrhea and otorrhea within 72 hours of traumatic injury. One-hundred thirty-four patients were randomized into intervention and control group. Comparative analysis was not possible in 58 patients as in due course they were either operated for head injury or lumbar drain was put due to excessive CSF leak; hence, forth comparative analysis was done in 76 patients. Out of these 76 patients, 44 patients belonged to the intervention group (Acetazolamide given) and 32 belong to the control group (Acetazolamide not given). The day of the stoppage of CSF Leak was the main endpoint of this study. Result  Majority of the patients were in the age group of 21 to 30 years and were predominantly males. Road traffic accident was observed in 84 (75%) patients. There was no statistically significant difference noted in the mean number of days of CSF leak whether acetazolamide was given or not ( p  = 0.344). The complication associated with CSF leak was meningitis. The percentage of patients developing meningitis was more after lumber drain insertion. Conclusion  In our study, there was no advantage of adding acetazolamide to the conservative management of traumatic CSF leak. Therefore, the practice of routinely giving acetazolamide should be reconsidered.

乙酰唑胺在创伤性 CSF 鼻出血和耳出血中的作用:随机对照试验
背景 未经治疗的脑脊液(CSF)鼻出血和耳鸣可导致脑膜炎等不良并发症,因此不容忽视。乙酰唑胺可减少 48% 的 CSF 生成。乙酰唑胺在改善外伤性 CSF 鼻出血和耳痛方面的实际作用尚不明确,因为迄今为止,很少有正式的研究。本研究旨在确定乙酰唑胺在外伤性脑脊液鼻出血和耳痛中的作用。材料和方法 在印度北部一家三级医疗中心神经外科就诊的 134 名颅脑损伤患者中进行了随机对照试验,这些患者在创伤后 72 小时内主诉出现脑脊液鼻出血和耳鸣。134 名患者被随机分为干预组和对照组。有 58 名患者因头部受伤而在适当的时候进行了手术,或因 CSF 渗漏过多而放置了腰椎引流管,因此无法进行比较分析;因此,对 76 名患者进行了比较分析。在这 76 名患者中,44 名属于干预组(给予乙酰唑胺),32 名属于对照组(未给予乙酰唑胺)。本研究的主要终点是脑脊液渗漏停止之日。结果 大多数患者年龄在 21-30 岁之间,以男性为主。84(75%)名患者发生过道路交通事故。无论是否服用乙酰唑胺,脑脊液漏的平均天数没有明显的统计学差异(P = 0.344)。与脑脊液漏相关的并发症是脑膜炎。插入椎管引流管后发生脑膜炎的患者比例更高。结论 在我们的研究中,在外伤性 CSF 漏的保守治疗中加入乙酰唑胺并无优势。因此,应重新考虑常规给予乙酰唑胺的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信