Intracranial Pressure Monitoring Location: A Pilot Study on the Validation of Subdural Site with the Intraventricular Site.

Asian journal of neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-06-18 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1787536
Suparna Bharadwaj, Mouleeswaran Sundaram, Dhritiman Chakrabarti, Radhakrishnan Muthuchellappan
{"title":"Intracranial Pressure Monitoring Location: A Pilot Study on the Validation of Subdural Site with the Intraventricular Site.","authors":"Suparna Bharadwaj, Mouleeswaran Sundaram, Dhritiman Chakrabarti, Radhakrishnan Muthuchellappan","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1787536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>  Knowledge of preoperative and intraoperative intracranial pressure (ICP) enables the neuroanesthesiologist to optimize cerebral perfusion pressure. However, ICP is rarely monitored during the intraoperative period. In this report, subdural site ICP measurement is validated with intraventricular ICP measurement, and the feasibility of subdural ICP monitoring during the intraoperative period is discussed. <b>Materials and Methods</b>  In this prospective pilot study, ICP measurement at the subdural site was achieved with an intravenous cannula and the ventricular site with a ventricular cannula. Both were transduced using a fluid-filled pressure transducer and connected to the monitor for display of the number and the waveforms. Monitoring of intraoperative ICP using both the techniques was done in all patients recruited into the study. The correlation between the two modalities of measurement was studied by the Spearman correlation test and their limits of agreement were studied using the Bland-Altman plot. A case series describing the perioperative management based on the subdural ICP values are also described. <b>Results</b>  Subdural ICP showed a strong correlation with intraventricular ICP ( <i>r</i> <sub>s </sub> = 0.93, <i>p</i>  = 0.01). Agreement analysis using the Bland-Altman plot showed that the mean difference of ICP between the modalities was 1.44 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, -0.6 to 3.49, <i>p</i>  = 0.122). <b>Discussion</b>  This study validates the ICP values measured at the subdural site with the intraventricular site. Subdural site ICP monitoring can be achieved rapidly with readily available systems and helps in making intraoperative clinical decisions. <b>Conclusion</b>  Cannula-based subdural ICP is a satisfactory alternative to intraventricular ICP monitoring in the intraoperative period.</p>","PeriodicalId":94300,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11349393/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction  Knowledge of preoperative and intraoperative intracranial pressure (ICP) enables the neuroanesthesiologist to optimize cerebral perfusion pressure. However, ICP is rarely monitored during the intraoperative period. In this report, subdural site ICP measurement is validated with intraventricular ICP measurement, and the feasibility of subdural ICP monitoring during the intraoperative period is discussed. Materials and Methods  In this prospective pilot study, ICP measurement at the subdural site was achieved with an intravenous cannula and the ventricular site with a ventricular cannula. Both were transduced using a fluid-filled pressure transducer and connected to the monitor for display of the number and the waveforms. Monitoring of intraoperative ICP using both the techniques was done in all patients recruited into the study. The correlation between the two modalities of measurement was studied by the Spearman correlation test and their limits of agreement were studied using the Bland-Altman plot. A case series describing the perioperative management based on the subdural ICP values are also described. Results  Subdural ICP showed a strong correlation with intraventricular ICP ( r s  = 0.93, p  = 0.01). Agreement analysis using the Bland-Altman plot showed that the mean difference of ICP between the modalities was 1.44 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, -0.6 to 3.49, p  = 0.122). Discussion  This study validates the ICP values measured at the subdural site with the intraventricular site. Subdural site ICP monitoring can be achieved rapidly with readily available systems and helps in making intraoperative clinical decisions. Conclusion  Cannula-based subdural ICP is a satisfactory alternative to intraventricular ICP monitoring in the intraoperative period.

颅内压监测位置:硬膜下部位与脑室内部位的验证试验研究。
引言 了解术前和术中颅内压(ICP)有助于神经麻醉医师优化脑灌注压。然而,术中很少监测 ICP。在本报告中,硬膜下部位 ICP 测量与脑室内 ICP 测量进行了验证,并讨论了术中硬膜下 ICP 监测的可行性。材料和方法 在这项前瞻性试验研究中,硬膜下部位的 ICP 测量采用静脉插管,脑室部位的 ICP 测量采用脑室插管。两者均使用充液压力传感器进行转换,并连接到监视器以显示数字和波形。本研究招募的所有患者均使用这两种技术监测术中 ICP。两种测量方式之间的相关性通过斯皮尔曼相关性检验进行了研究,它们之间的一致性极限通过布兰德-阿尔特曼图进行了研究。此外,还介绍了根据硬膜下 ICP 值进行围手术期管理的系列病例。结果 硬膜下 ICP 与脑室内 ICP 有很强的相关性(r s = 0.93,p = 0.01)。使用 Bland-Altman 图进行的一致性分析表明,两种模式间 ICP 的平均差异为 1.44 mm Hg(95% 置信区间,-0.6 至 3.49,p = 0.122)。讨论 本研究验证了硬膜下部位与脑室内部位的 ICP 测量值。硬膜下部位的 ICP 监测可通过现成的系统快速实现,有助于术中临床决策。结论 在术中,硬膜下插管式 ICP 是替代脑室内 ICP 监测的理想方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信