The incidence of atrial fibrillation detected by implantable loop recorders: a comparison between patients with and without embolic stroke of undetermined source.

Panagiota A Chousou, Rahul K Chattopadhyay, Gareth Matthews, Allan Clark, Vassilios S Vassiliou, Peter J Pugh
{"title":"The incidence of atrial fibrillation detected by implantable loop recorders: a comparison between patients with and without embolic stroke of undetermined source.","authors":"Panagiota A Chousou, Rahul K Chattopadhyay, Gareth Matthews, Allan Clark, Vassilios S Vassiliou, Peter J Pugh","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeae061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Stroke is the most debilitating outcome of atrial fibrillation (AF). The use of implantable loop recorders increases the detection of AF episodes among patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source. The significance of device-detected AF, or subclinical AF, is unknown. This study aimed to compare the incidence of AF detected by implantable loop recorder in patients with and without embolic stroke of undetermined source.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We retrospectively studied all patients without known AF who were referred to our institution for implantable loop recorder implantation following embolic stroke of undetermined source, syncope, or palpitations from March 2009 to November 2019. The primary endpoint was any detection of AF or atrial flutter by implantable loop recorder. Seven hundred and fifty patients were included and followed up for a mean duration of 731 days (SD 443). An implantable loop recorder was implanted following embolic stroke of undetermined source in 323 and for assessment of syncope, palpitations, or another reason in 427 patients. The incidence of AF was significantly (<i>P</i> < 0.001) higher among patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source compared with the non-embolic stroke of undetermined source group; 48.6% vs. 13.8% (for any duration of AF) and 32.2% vs. 12.4% (for AF lasting ≥30 s) both <i>P</i> < 0.001. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significantly higher incidence of AF for incremental durations of AF up to >5.5 h, but not >24 h. This was driven by longest AF durations of <6 min and between 5.5 h and 24 h, suggesting a bimodal distribution. In a multivariable Cox regression analysis, embolic stroke of undetermined source independently conferred an almost 5-fold increase in the hazard for any duration of AF.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The incidence of AF is significantly higher amongst embolic stroke of undetermined source vs. non-embolic stroke of undetermined source patients monitored constantly by an implantable loop recorder. A high number of embolic stroke of undetermined source survivors have short-duration AF episodes. Further work is needed to determine the optimal treatment strategy of these AF episodes in embolic stroke of undetermined source.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11366165/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeae061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Stroke is the most debilitating outcome of atrial fibrillation (AF). The use of implantable loop recorders increases the detection of AF episodes among patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source. The significance of device-detected AF, or subclinical AF, is unknown. This study aimed to compare the incidence of AF detected by implantable loop recorder in patients with and without embolic stroke of undetermined source.

Methods and results: We retrospectively studied all patients without known AF who were referred to our institution for implantable loop recorder implantation following embolic stroke of undetermined source, syncope, or palpitations from March 2009 to November 2019. The primary endpoint was any detection of AF or atrial flutter by implantable loop recorder. Seven hundred and fifty patients were included and followed up for a mean duration of 731 days (SD 443). An implantable loop recorder was implanted following embolic stroke of undetermined source in 323 and for assessment of syncope, palpitations, or another reason in 427 patients. The incidence of AF was significantly (P < 0.001) higher among patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source compared with the non-embolic stroke of undetermined source group; 48.6% vs. 13.8% (for any duration of AF) and 32.2% vs. 12.4% (for AF lasting ≥30 s) both P < 0.001. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significantly higher incidence of AF for incremental durations of AF up to >5.5 h, but not >24 h. This was driven by longest AF durations of <6 min and between 5.5 h and 24 h, suggesting a bimodal distribution. In a multivariable Cox regression analysis, embolic stroke of undetermined source independently conferred an almost 5-fold increase in the hazard for any duration of AF.

Conclusion: The incidence of AF is significantly higher amongst embolic stroke of undetermined source vs. non-embolic stroke of undetermined source patients monitored constantly by an implantable loop recorder. A high number of embolic stroke of undetermined source survivors have short-duration AF episodes. Further work is needed to determine the optimal treatment strategy of these AF episodes in embolic stroke of undetermined source.

植入式回路记录器检测到的心房颤动发生率:来源不明的栓塞性中风患者与未发生栓塞性中风患者的比较。
目的:中风是心房颤动(房颤)导致的最严重后果。植入式循环记录器的使用提高了不明原因栓塞性中风患者心房颤动发作的检出率。设备检测到的房颤或亚临床房颤的意义尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较植入式回路记录器在不明原因栓塞性中风患者和非栓塞性中风患者中检测到的房颤发生率:我们回顾性研究了 2009 年 3 月至 2019 年 11 月期间因不明原因的栓塞性中风、晕厥或心悸而转诊至我院进行植入式环形记录仪植入术的所有无已知房颤的患者。主要终点是通过植入式环路记录器检测到房颤或心房扑动。共纳入 750 名患者,平均随访时间为 731 天(标清 443 天)。其中 323 例患者是在不明原因的栓塞性中风后植入植入环路记录器,427 例患者是在评估晕厥、心悸或其他原因时植入植入环路记录器。与来源不明的非栓塞性中风组相比,来源不明的栓塞性中风患者的房颤发生率明显较高(P < 0.001):48.6% 对 13.8%(任何房颤持续时间)和 32.2% 对 12.4%(房颤持续时间≥30 秒),均 P < 0.001。卡普兰-梅耶分析显示,房颤持续时间递增至>5.5小时的房颤发生率明显高于>24小时的房颤发生率。这是由最长的房颤持续时间所导致的:在接受植入式循环记录仪持续监测的不明原因栓塞性中风患者与非不明原因栓塞性中风患者中,房颤的发生率明显较高。大量来源不明的栓塞性中风幸存者的房颤发作持续时间很短。需要进一步开展工作,以确定针对来源不明的栓塞性中风患者房颤发作的最佳治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信