Community-based COVID-19 vaccination services improve user satisfaction: findings from a large household survey in Bali Province, Indonesia.

I Made Dwi Ariawan, Anak Agung Sagung Sawitri, Putu Cintya Denny Yuliyatni, Desak Nyoman Widyanthini, I Nyoman Sutarsa
{"title":"Community-based COVID-19 vaccination services improve user satisfaction: findings from a large household survey in Bali Province, Indonesia.","authors":"I Made Dwi Ariawan, Anak Agung Sagung Sawitri, Putu Cintya Denny Yuliyatni, Desak Nyoman Widyanthini, I Nyoman Sutarsa","doi":"10.1071/PY24014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Understanding community preferences for vaccination services is crucial for improving coverage and satisfaction. There are three main approaches for COVID-19 vaccination in Indonesia: health facility-based, community-based, and outreach approaches. This study aims to assess how the vaccination approaches impact user satisfaction levels. Methods This study was part of a large household survey involving 12,120 respondents across nine districts in Bali Province. The study population comprised all residents aged ≥12years who had received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccination. Samples were selected through three stages of systematic random sampling. Data were collected through interviews using structured questionnaires, which included socio-demographic characteristics, vaccination services, and satisfaction levels. Analysis was performed using Chi Square test and logistic regression, with the entire process incorporating weighting factors. Results A total of 12,120 respondents reported receiving their first dose of COVID-19 vaccination. The satisfaction level among vaccine recipients (partial, complete, and booster doses) was high (84.31%). Satisfaction within each SERVQUAL dimension was highest in tangibles (96.10%), followed by responsiveness (93.25%), empathy (92.48%), assurance (92.35%), and reliability (92.32%). There was no significant difference in the overall SERVQUAL score between the health facility and community-based approaches. However, the latter slightly improved user satisfaction across three dimensions: tangibles (adjusted odds ratio, AOR=1.52, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.21-1.90), reliability (AOR=1.67, 95%CI=1.42-1.96), and assurance (AOR=1.26, 95%CI=1.07-1.48). Conclusion During the pandemic, both health facility and community-based approaches resulted in a high satisfaction level. It is recommended that the government prioritise and optimise community-based programs and health facility-based delivery in future vaccination initiatives, especially during public health emergencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":93892,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":"30 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of primary health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY24014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Understanding community preferences for vaccination services is crucial for improving coverage and satisfaction. There are three main approaches for COVID-19 vaccination in Indonesia: health facility-based, community-based, and outreach approaches. This study aims to assess how the vaccination approaches impact user satisfaction levels. Methods This study was part of a large household survey involving 12,120 respondents across nine districts in Bali Province. The study population comprised all residents aged ≥12years who had received at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccination. Samples were selected through three stages of systematic random sampling. Data were collected through interviews using structured questionnaires, which included socio-demographic characteristics, vaccination services, and satisfaction levels. Analysis was performed using Chi Square test and logistic regression, with the entire process incorporating weighting factors. Results A total of 12,120 respondents reported receiving their first dose of COVID-19 vaccination. The satisfaction level among vaccine recipients (partial, complete, and booster doses) was high (84.31%). Satisfaction within each SERVQUAL dimension was highest in tangibles (96.10%), followed by responsiveness (93.25%), empathy (92.48%), assurance (92.35%), and reliability (92.32%). There was no significant difference in the overall SERVQUAL score between the health facility and community-based approaches. However, the latter slightly improved user satisfaction across three dimensions: tangibles (adjusted odds ratio, AOR=1.52, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.21-1.90), reliability (AOR=1.67, 95%CI=1.42-1.96), and assurance (AOR=1.26, 95%CI=1.07-1.48). Conclusion During the pandemic, both health facility and community-based approaches resulted in a high satisfaction level. It is recommended that the government prioritise and optimise community-based programs and health facility-based delivery in future vaccination initiatives, especially during public health emergencies.

基于社区的 COVID-19 疫苗接种服务提高了用户满意度:印度尼西亚巴厘省大型家庭调查的结果。
背景 了解社区对疫苗接种服务的偏好对于提高覆盖率和满意度至关重要。在印度尼西亚,COVID-19 疫苗接种主要有三种方法:基于医疗机构的方法、基于社区的方法和外展方法。本研究旨在评估疫苗接种方法对用户满意度的影响。方法 本研究是一项大型家庭调查的一部分,涉及巴厘省 9 个地区的 12120 名受访者。研究对象包括所有年龄≥12 岁、至少接种过一剂 COVID-19 疫苗的居民。样本通过三个阶段的系统随机抽样选出。研究人员通过结构化问卷进行访谈收集数据,问卷内容包括社会人口学特征、疫苗接种服务和满意度。数据分析采用了卡方检验法和逻辑回归法,整个过程包含加权因素。结果 共有 12120 名受访者表示接种了第一剂 COVID-19 疫苗。疫苗接种者(部分剂量、全部剂量和加强剂量)的满意度很高(84.31%)。SERVQUAL各维度中满意度最高的是有形性(96.10%),其次是响应性(93.25%)、同理心(92.48%)、保证性(92.35%)和可靠性(92.32%)。医疗卫生机构和社区方法的 SERVQUAL 总分没有明显差异。然而,后者在以下三个方面略微提高了用户满意度:有形性(调整后的几率比,AOR=1.52,95% 置信区间 (CI)=1.21-1.90)、可靠性(AOR=1.67,95% 置信区间 (CI)=1.42-1.96)和保证性(AOR=1.26,95% 置信区间 (CI)=1.07-1.48)。结论 在大流行期间,医疗机构和以社区为基础的方法都带来了较高的满意度。建议政府在未来的疫苗接种行动中,尤其是在公共卫生突发事件期间,优先考虑并优化以社区为基础的计划和以医疗机构为基础的服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信