Rihab Ayadi, Monia Tlig, Imène Ben Jdida, Kaouther Zribi, Linda Khefacha, Mouna Sassi, Balsam Kacem, Amani Chérif
{"title":"Comparative Study Between Blood Glucose Meters in a Maternity Center.","authors":"Rihab Ayadi, Monia Tlig, Imène Ben Jdida, Kaouther Zribi, Linda Khefacha, Mouna Sassi, Balsam Kacem, Amani Chérif","doi":"10.1089/whr.2024.0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Monitoring of diabetes by measuring capillary blood glucose using a glucometer.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the three most used glucose meters in diabetic patients in a maternity and neonatal center in terms of repeatability, accuracy, and stability.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A comparative study on 100 diabetic patients admitted to the various departments of a maternity and neonatal center. For each patient, a capillary measurement was made using each of the three glucometers to be tested (Accucheck<sup>®</sup>, On Call<sup>®</sup> and Bionime<sup>®</sup>) as well as a blood glucose on venous blood, performed in the laboratory using the Siemens X brand plus<sup>®</sup> PLC (reference method). The same sample was used to carry out all measurements.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusions: </strong>The Accucheck<sup>®</sup> brand reader and the On Call<sup>®</sup> brand thus, show a better correlation for open and closed bottles of test strips'storage, compared with the Bionime<sup>®</sup> brand reader. We found that the Accucheck<sup>®</sup> and On Call<sup>®</sup> readers are comparable in terms of reliability of results and are better than the Bionime<sup>®</sup> brand reader. We have found that, first using closed vials give more accurate results for glycemia readers and also, On Call<sup>®</sup> and Accucheck<sup>®</sup> brand readers are more reliable and accurate than the Bionime<sup>®</sup> brand reader.</p>","PeriodicalId":75329,"journal":{"name":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","volume":"5 1","pages":"572-578"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11347866/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/whr.2024.0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Monitoring of diabetes by measuring capillary blood glucose using a glucometer.
Objectives: To compare the three most used glucose meters in diabetic patients in a maternity and neonatal center in terms of repeatability, accuracy, and stability.
Methodology: A comparative study on 100 diabetic patients admitted to the various departments of a maternity and neonatal center. For each patient, a capillary measurement was made using each of the three glucometers to be tested (Accucheck®, On Call® and Bionime®) as well as a blood glucose on venous blood, performed in the laboratory using the Siemens X brand plus® PLC (reference method). The same sample was used to carry out all measurements.
Results and conclusions: The Accucheck® brand reader and the On Call® brand thus, show a better correlation for open and closed bottles of test strips'storage, compared with the Bionime® brand reader. We found that the Accucheck® and On Call® readers are comparable in terms of reliability of results and are better than the Bionime® brand reader. We have found that, first using closed vials give more accurate results for glycemia readers and also, On Call® and Accucheck® brand readers are more reliable and accurate than the Bionime® brand reader.