{"title":"Risk-scoring system predicting need for hospital-specific interventional care after peroral endoscopic myotomy","authors":"Hirofumi Abe, Shinwa Tanaka, Hiroya Sakaguchi, Chise Ueda, Hitomi Hori, Tatsuya Nakai, Tetsuya Yoshizaki, Fumiaki Kawara, Takashi Toyonaga, Masato Kinoshita, Satoshi Urakami, Shinya Hoki, Hiroshi Tanabe, Yuzo Kodama","doi":"10.1111/den.14909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Early identification of patients needing hospital-specific interventional care (HIC) following endoscopic treatment is valuable for optimizing postoperative hospital stays. We aimed to develop and validate a risk-scoring system for predicting HIC in patients who underwent peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study included patients with esophageal motility disorders who underwent POEM at our hospital between April 2015 and March 2023. HIC was defined as any of the following situations: fasting for gastrointestinal rest to manage adverse events (AEs); intravenous administration of medications such as antibiotics and blood transfusion; endoscopic, radiologic, and surgical interventions; intensive care unit management; or other life-threatening events. A risk-scoring system for predicting HIC after postoperative day (POD) 1 was developed using multivariable logistic regression and was internally validated using bootstrapping and decision curve analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the 589 patients, 50 (8.5%) experienced HIC after POD1. Risk scores were assigned for four factors as follows: age (0 points for <70 years, 1 point for 70–79 years, 2 points for ≥80 years), preoperative prognostic nutritional index (0 points for >45, 1 point for 40–45, 4 points for <40), postoperative surgical site AEs on second-look endoscopy (7 points), and postoperative pneumonia on chest radiography (6 points). The discriminative ability (concordance statistics, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.78–0.91) and calibration (slope 1.00; 0.74–1.28) were satisfactory. The decision curve analysis demonstrated its clinical usefulness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This risk-scoring system can predict the HIC after POD1 and provide useful information for determining discharge.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":159,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Endoscopy","volume":"37 3","pages":"247-256"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/den.14909","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
Early identification of patients needing hospital-specific interventional care (HIC) following endoscopic treatment is valuable for optimizing postoperative hospital stays. We aimed to develop and validate a risk-scoring system for predicting HIC in patients who underwent peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).
Methods
This study included patients with esophageal motility disorders who underwent POEM at our hospital between April 2015 and March 2023. HIC was defined as any of the following situations: fasting for gastrointestinal rest to manage adverse events (AEs); intravenous administration of medications such as antibiotics and blood transfusion; endoscopic, radiologic, and surgical interventions; intensive care unit management; or other life-threatening events. A risk-scoring system for predicting HIC after postoperative day (POD) 1 was developed using multivariable logistic regression and was internally validated using bootstrapping and decision curve analysis.
Results
Of the 589 patients, 50 (8.5%) experienced HIC after POD1. Risk scores were assigned for four factors as follows: age (0 points for <70 years, 1 point for 70–79 years, 2 points for ≥80 years), preoperative prognostic nutritional index (0 points for >45, 1 point for 40–45, 4 points for <40), postoperative surgical site AEs on second-look endoscopy (7 points), and postoperative pneumonia on chest radiography (6 points). The discriminative ability (concordance statistics, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.78–0.91) and calibration (slope 1.00; 0.74–1.28) were satisfactory. The decision curve analysis demonstrated its clinical usefulness.
Conclusion
This risk-scoring system can predict the HIC after POD1 and provide useful information for determining discharge.
期刊介绍:
Digestive Endoscopy (DEN) is the official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, the Asian Pacific Society for Digestive Endoscopy and the World Endoscopy Organization. Digestive Endoscopy serves as a medium for presenting original articles that offer significant contributions to knowledge in the broad field of endoscopy. The Journal also includes Reviews, Original Articles, How I Do It, Case Reports (only of exceptional interest and novelty are accepted), Letters, Techniques and Images, abstracts and news items that may be of interest to endoscopists.