A costing and health-related quality of life study of high intensity focused ultrasound in primary treatment of localized low or intermediate risk prostate cancer in Ontario.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Canadian Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2024-08-01
Bassem Toeama, Nathan Perlis, Paul Grootendorst, William Orovan, Emmanuel Papadimitropoulos
{"title":"A costing and health-related quality of life study of high intensity focused ultrasound in primary treatment of localized low or intermediate risk prostate cancer in Ontario.","authors":"Bassem Toeama, Nathan Perlis, Paul Grootendorst, William Orovan, Emmanuel Papadimitropoulos","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prostate cancer is the third leading cause of death from cancer among Canadian men. High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a novel approach for primary treatment of localized prostate cancer. Little is known, however, about its costs. We aimed to collect the direct costs and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data of HIFU in primary treatment of localized low and intermediate risk prostate cancer in Ontario.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We collected direct costs and HRQoL data of 20 patients with localized low or intermediate risk prostate cancer who received whole-gland HIFU at a privately owned clinic in Ontario. We compared the direct costs of HIFU, open radical prostatectomy (ORP), robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), and external beam radiation therapy (RT) in primary treatment of localized low and intermediate risk prostate cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average direct costs of HIFU, ORP, RARP, and RT per case in 2023 are $14,886.78, $14,192.26, $21,794.55, and $17,377.51, respectively. The median and interquartile range (IQR) of the study participants' age and HRQoL data prior to the HIFU procedure were 64.5 (11.25) years, 94.5 (8.65), 38.5 (4), 6.0 (4.46), and 22.5 (8.32), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our healthcare payer's perspective costing study revealed median direct costs per case of HIFU and favorable HRQoL outcomes compared to other treatment options for primary treatment of localized low and intermediate risk prostate cancer in Ontario. A health economic model is warranted to analyze the cost-effectiveness of HIFU compared to other treatment options in primary treatment of localized low and intermediate risk prostate cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":56323,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Prostate cancer is the third leading cause of death from cancer among Canadian men. High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is a novel approach for primary treatment of localized prostate cancer. Little is known, however, about its costs. We aimed to collect the direct costs and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) data of HIFU in primary treatment of localized low and intermediate risk prostate cancer in Ontario.

Materials and methods: We collected direct costs and HRQoL data of 20 patients with localized low or intermediate risk prostate cancer who received whole-gland HIFU at a privately owned clinic in Ontario. We compared the direct costs of HIFU, open radical prostatectomy (ORP), robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), and external beam radiation therapy (RT) in primary treatment of localized low and intermediate risk prostate cancer.

Results: The average direct costs of HIFU, ORP, RARP, and RT per case in 2023 are $14,886.78, $14,192.26, $21,794.55, and $17,377.51, respectively. The median and interquartile range (IQR) of the study participants' age and HRQoL data prior to the HIFU procedure were 64.5 (11.25) years, 94.5 (8.65), 38.5 (4), 6.0 (4.46), and 22.5 (8.32), respectively.

Conclusion: Our healthcare payer's perspective costing study revealed median direct costs per case of HIFU and favorable HRQoL outcomes compared to other treatment options for primary treatment of localized low and intermediate risk prostate cancer in Ontario. A health economic model is warranted to analyze the cost-effectiveness of HIFU compared to other treatment options in primary treatment of localized low and intermediate risk prostate cancer.

安大略省高强度聚焦超声波用于局部低危或中危前列腺癌初级治疗的成本核算和健康相关生活质量研究。
导言:前列腺癌是加拿大男性癌症死亡的第三大原因。高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)是治疗局部前列腺癌的一种新方法。然而,人们对其成本知之甚少。我们旨在收集安大略省 HIFU 治疗局部低危和中危前列腺癌的直接成本和与健康相关的生活质量 (HRQoL) 数据:我们收集了在安大略省一家私人诊所接受全腺 HIFU 治疗的 20 名局部低危或中危前列腺癌患者的直接成本和 HRQoL 数据。我们比较了HIFU、开放性前列腺癌根治术(ORP)、机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术(RARP)和体外放射治疗(RT)在局部低危和中危前列腺癌初级治疗中的直接成本:2023年每例HIFU、ORP、RARP和RT的平均直接成本分别为14886.78美元、14192.26美元、21794.55美元和17377.51美元。研究参与者在接受 HIFU 治疗前的年龄和 HRQoL 数据的中位数和四分位距(IQR)分别为 64.5 (11.25) 岁、94.5 (8.65)、38.5 (4)、6.0 (4.46) 和 22.5 (8.32):我们从医疗支付方的角度进行的成本核算研究显示,在安大略省,与其他治疗方法相比,HIFU治疗局部低危和中危前列腺癌的每例直接成本中位数和良好的HRQoL结果。有必要建立健康经济模型,分析在局部低危和中危前列腺癌的初级治疗中,HIFU与其他治疗方案相比的成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Urology
Canadian Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The CJU publishes articles of interest to the field of urology and related specialties who treat urologic diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信