A Comparison of Throwing Arm Kinetics and Ball Velocity in High School Pitchers With Overall Fast and Overall Slow Cumulative Joint and Segment Velocities.

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
American Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1177/03635465241271968
Joseph E Manzi, Brittany Dowling, Zhaorui Wang, Suleiman Y Sudah, Brockton A Dowling, Mark Wishman, Kathryn McElheny, Joseph J Ruzbarsky, Brandon J Erickson, Michael C Ciccotti, Michael G Ciccotti, Joshua S Dines
{"title":"A Comparison of Throwing Arm Kinetics and Ball Velocity in High School Pitchers With Overall Fast and Overall Slow Cumulative Joint and Segment Velocities.","authors":"Joseph E Manzi, Brittany Dowling, Zhaorui Wang, Suleiman Y Sudah, Brockton A Dowling, Mark Wishman, Kathryn McElheny, Joseph J Ruzbarsky, Brandon J Erickson, Michael C Ciccotti, Michael G Ciccotti, Joshua S Dines","doi":"10.1177/03635465241271968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individual maximum joint and segment angular velocities have shown positive associations with throwing arm kinetics and ball velocity in baseball pitchers.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To observe how cumulative maximum joint and segment angular velocities, irrespective of sequence, affect ball velocity and throwing arm kinetics in high school pitchers.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Descriptive laboratory study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>High school (n = 55) pitchers threw 8 to 12 fastball pitches while being evaluated with 3-dimensional motion capture (480 Hz). Maximum joint and segment angular velocities (lead knee extension, pelvis rotation, trunk rotation, shoulder internal rotation, and forearm pronation) were calculated for each pitcher. Pitchers were classified as overall fast, overall slow, or high velocity for each joint or segment velocity subcategory, or as population, with any pitcher eligible to be included in multiple subcategories. Kinematic and kinetic parameters were compared among the various subgroups using <i>t</i> tests with post hoc regressions and multivariable regression models created to predict throwing arm kinetics and ball velocity, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The lead knee extension and pelvis rotation velocity subgroups achieved significantly higher normalized elbow varus torque (<i>P</i> = .016) and elbow flexion torque (<i>P</i> = .018) compared with population, with equivalent ball velocity (<i>P</i> = .118). For every 1-SD increase in maximum pelvis rotation velocity (87 deg/s), the normalized elbow distractive force increased by 4.7% body weight (BW) (<i>B</i> = 0.054; β = 0.290; <i>P</i> = .013). The overall fast group was older (mean ± standard deviation, 16.9 ± 1.4 vs 15.4 ± 0.9 years; <i>P</i> = .007), had 8.9-mph faster ball velocity (32.7 ± 3.1 vs 28.7 ± 2.3 m/s; <i>P</i> = .002), and had significantly higher shoulder internal rotation torque (63.1 ± 17.4 vs 43.6 ± 12.0 Nm; <i>P</i> = .005), elbow varus torque (61.8 ± 16.4 vs 41.6 ± 11.4 Nm; <i>P</i> = .002), and elbow flexion torque (46.4 ± 12.0 vs 29.5 ± 6.8 Nm; <i>P</i> < .001) compared with the overall slow group. A multiregression model for ball velocity based on maximum joint and segment angular velocities and anthropometrics predicted 53.0% of variance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High school pitchers with higher maximum joint and segment velocities, irrespective of sequence, demonstrated older age and faster ball velocity at the cost of increased throwing shoulder and elbow kinetics.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Pitchers and coaching staff should consider this trade-off between faster ball velocity and increasing throwing arm kinetics, an established risk factor for elbow injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241271968","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Individual maximum joint and segment angular velocities have shown positive associations with throwing arm kinetics and ball velocity in baseball pitchers.

Purpose: To observe how cumulative maximum joint and segment angular velocities, irrespective of sequence, affect ball velocity and throwing arm kinetics in high school pitchers.

Study design: Descriptive laboratory study.

Methods: High school (n = 55) pitchers threw 8 to 12 fastball pitches while being evaluated with 3-dimensional motion capture (480 Hz). Maximum joint and segment angular velocities (lead knee extension, pelvis rotation, trunk rotation, shoulder internal rotation, and forearm pronation) were calculated for each pitcher. Pitchers were classified as overall fast, overall slow, or high velocity for each joint or segment velocity subcategory, or as population, with any pitcher eligible to be included in multiple subcategories. Kinematic and kinetic parameters were compared among the various subgroups using t tests with post hoc regressions and multivariable regression models created to predict throwing arm kinetics and ball velocity, respectively.

Results: The lead knee extension and pelvis rotation velocity subgroups achieved significantly higher normalized elbow varus torque (P = .016) and elbow flexion torque (P = .018) compared with population, with equivalent ball velocity (P = .118). For every 1-SD increase in maximum pelvis rotation velocity (87 deg/s), the normalized elbow distractive force increased by 4.7% body weight (BW) (B = 0.054; β = 0.290; P = .013). The overall fast group was older (mean ± standard deviation, 16.9 ± 1.4 vs 15.4 ± 0.9 years; P = .007), had 8.9-mph faster ball velocity (32.7 ± 3.1 vs 28.7 ± 2.3 m/s; P = .002), and had significantly higher shoulder internal rotation torque (63.1 ± 17.4 vs 43.6 ± 12.0 Nm; P = .005), elbow varus torque (61.8 ± 16.4 vs 41.6 ± 11.4 Nm; P = .002), and elbow flexion torque (46.4 ± 12.0 vs 29.5 ± 6.8 Nm; P < .001) compared with the overall slow group. A multiregression model for ball velocity based on maximum joint and segment angular velocities and anthropometrics predicted 53.0% of variance.

Conclusion: High school pitchers with higher maximum joint and segment velocities, irrespective of sequence, demonstrated older age and faster ball velocity at the cost of increased throwing shoulder and elbow kinetics.

Clinical relevance: Pitchers and coaching staff should consider this trade-off between faster ball velocity and increasing throwing arm kinetics, an established risk factor for elbow injury.

高中投球手投掷臂动力学和球速的比较:关节和分段累积速度的总体快慢。
背景:目的:观察累积的最大关节角速度和节段角速度(与顺序无关)如何影响高中投手的球速和投臂动力学:研究设计:描述性实验室研究。方法:高中投手(n = 55)投掷 8 到 12 个快速球,同时接受三维运动捕捉(480 Hz)评估。计算每个投手的最大关节和节段角速度(膝关节前伸、骨盆旋转、躯干旋转、肩关节内旋和前臂前伸)。在每个关节或节段速度子类别中,投手被划分为总体速度快、总体速度慢或速度高,或者被划分为人群,任何投手都有资格被纳入多个子类别。使用 t 检验比较不同亚组的运动学和动力学参数,并建立事后回归和多变量回归模型,分别预测投掷臂动力学和球速:结果:在球速相同(P = .118)的情况下,膝关节伸展和骨盆旋转速度领先亚组的归一化肘关节屈伸力矩(P = .016)和肘关节屈曲力矩(P = .018)明显高于其他亚组。骨盆最大旋转速度(87 度/秒)每增加 1 个标准差,归一化肘关节分散力就会增加 4.7% 体重 (BW) (B = 0.054; β = 0.290; P = .013)。快速组的总体年龄较大(平均值 ± 标准差,16.9 ± 1.4 vs 15.4 ± 0.9 岁;P = .007),球速快 8.9 英里/小时(32.7 ± 3.1 vs 28.7 ± 2.3 米/秒;P = .002),肩内旋扭矩明显更高(63.1 ± 17.4 vs 43.1 ± 17.4)。1 ± 17.4 vs 43.6 ± 12.0 牛米;P = .005)、肘关节屈伸扭矩(61.8 ± 16.4 vs 41.6 ± 11.4 牛米;P = .002)和肘关节弯曲扭矩(46.4 ± 12.0 vs 29.5 ± 6.8 牛米;P < .001)。基于最大关节和关节段角速度以及人体测量学的球速多元回归模型预测了 53.0% 的差异:结论:最大关节和关节段速度较高的高中投手,无论顺序如何,都表现出年龄较大、球速较快的特点,但投掷肩部和肘部的动力却有所增加:临床相关性:投手和教练员应考虑在更快的球速和更强的投掷臂动力之间进行权衡,投掷臂动力是肘部受伤的既定风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
425
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: An invaluable resource for the orthopaedic sports medicine community, _The American Journal of Sports Medicine_ is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, first published in 1972. It is the official publication of the [American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM)](http://www.sportsmed.org/)! The journal acts as an important forum for independent orthopaedic sports medicine research and education, allowing clinical practitioners the ability to make decisions based on sound scientific information. This journal is a must-read for: * Orthopaedic Surgeons and Specialists * Sports Medicine Physicians * Physiatrists * Athletic Trainers * Team Physicians * And Physical Therapists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信