UK Trainee Experience with WALANT - An Audit of 102 Cases.

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY
Maduri Satkunabalan, Rabeet Khan, Zhi Yang Ng
{"title":"UK Trainee Experience with WALANT - An Audit of 102 Cases.","authors":"Maduri Satkunabalan, Rabeet Khan, Zhi Yang Ng","doi":"10.1142/S2424835524500449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> WALANT has gained much popularity in recent years, especially with COVID-19. However, a recent survey of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand membership (i.e. attendings/consultants) showed that only 17% were exposed to WALANT during residency or fellowship training. There is much interest in WALANT from trainees, but interpretation of the type and volume to be administered is highly varied. <b>Methods:</b> The aims of this study were (1) to survey a group of plastic surgery trainees in the UK about their knowledge of WALANT formulas, and (2) to compare trainee logbook records of WALANT procedures (if available) with published data from the UK. <b>Results:</b> All trainees were familiar with the 'standard' WALANT formula (1% lidocaine, 1:100,000 adrenaline ± 8.4% NaHCO<sub>3</sub>) described by Lalonde. However, because of local formularies, rather than 1:100,000 adrenaline, all used 1:200,000 adrenaline as it comes premixed in the UK. Other formulas used by UK trainees included 0.5% bupivacaine + 1:200,000 adrenaline, and mixing 1% lidocaine + 1:200,000 adrenaline with 1% lidocaine 1:1. In comparing available trainee WALANT records with published UK data, the average volume of WALANT used was 6.6 mls in the current study versus 12.9 mls for similar procedures (wound debridement and skin closure ± local flap, digital nerve repair, fingertip reconstruction, thenar injuries, phalangeal fracture and single digit extensor repair); specifically, for single digit flexor tendon repairs, this was 10 mls versus 16.3 mls. <b>Conclusions:</b> While the British Society for Surgery of the Hand (BSSH) have developed official guidance for the use of WALANT in the UK, it appears there remains much variation in interpretation and hence, application. Comparison of trainee logbook records of common hand surgery procedures suggests that most can be done with much less WALANT administered than previously reported, with safe and reproducible results. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level IV (Therapeutic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835524500449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: WALANT has gained much popularity in recent years, especially with COVID-19. However, a recent survey of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand membership (i.e. attendings/consultants) showed that only 17% were exposed to WALANT during residency or fellowship training. There is much interest in WALANT from trainees, but interpretation of the type and volume to be administered is highly varied. Methods: The aims of this study were (1) to survey a group of plastic surgery trainees in the UK about their knowledge of WALANT formulas, and (2) to compare trainee logbook records of WALANT procedures (if available) with published data from the UK. Results: All trainees were familiar with the 'standard' WALANT formula (1% lidocaine, 1:100,000 adrenaline ± 8.4% NaHCO3) described by Lalonde. However, because of local formularies, rather than 1:100,000 adrenaline, all used 1:200,000 adrenaline as it comes premixed in the UK. Other formulas used by UK trainees included 0.5% bupivacaine + 1:200,000 adrenaline, and mixing 1% lidocaine + 1:200,000 adrenaline with 1% lidocaine 1:1. In comparing available trainee WALANT records with published UK data, the average volume of WALANT used was 6.6 mls in the current study versus 12.9 mls for similar procedures (wound debridement and skin closure ± local flap, digital nerve repair, fingertip reconstruction, thenar injuries, phalangeal fracture and single digit extensor repair); specifically, for single digit flexor tendon repairs, this was 10 mls versus 16.3 mls. Conclusions: While the British Society for Surgery of the Hand (BSSH) have developed official guidance for the use of WALANT in the UK, it appears there remains much variation in interpretation and hence, application. Comparison of trainee logbook records of common hand surgery procedures suggests that most can be done with much less WALANT administered than previously reported, with safe and reproducible results. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

英国实习生使用 WALANT 的经验 - 对 102 个案例的审计。
背景介绍WALANT 近年来大受欢迎,尤其是 COVID-19。然而,最近对美国手外科学会会员(即主治医师/顾问)进行的一项调查显示,只有 17% 的人在住院医师或研究员培训期间接触过 WALANT。受训者对 WALANT 很感兴趣,但对其类型和施用量的理解却大相径庭。研究方法:本研究的目的是:(1) 调查英国整形外科受训人员对 WALANT 配方的了解程度;(2) 将受训人员的 WALANT 手术日志记录(如有)与英国公布的数据进行比较。结果:所有受训人员都熟悉拉隆德描述的 "标准 "WALANT配方(1% 利多卡因、1:100,000 肾上腺素 ± 8.4% NaHCO3)。不过,由于各地的配方不同,所有学员使用的都不是 1:100,000 肾上腺素,而是 1:200,000 肾上腺素,因为这种药物在英国是预混的。英国学员使用的其他配方包括 0.5% 布比卡因 + 1:200,000 肾上腺素,以及 1%利多卡因 + 1:200,000 肾上腺素与 1%利多卡因 1:1 混合。将现有的受训者WALANT记录与英国公布的数据进行比较后发现,本研究中WALANT的平均使用量为6.6毫升,而类似手术(伤口清创和皮肤闭合±局部皮瓣、数字神经修复、指尖重建、腕关节损伤、指骨骨折和单指伸肌腱修复)的平均使用量为12.9毫升;具体而言,单指屈肌腱修复的平均使用量为10毫升,而类似手术的平均使用量为16.3毫升。结论:虽然英国手外科学会(BSSH)已制定了在英国使用 WALANT 的官方指南,但在解释和应用方面似乎仍存在很大差异。对常见手外科手术的受训者日志记录进行比较后发现,大多数手术的WALANT用量比之前报道的要少得多,而且结果安全、可重复。证据等级:四级(治疗)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
304
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信