Adherence to Non-operative Clinical Quality Measures in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY
Julia A Cook, Meghan N Cichocki, Yanlin Tong, Lu Wang, Kevin C Chung
{"title":"Adherence to Non-operative Clinical Quality Measures in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.","authors":"Julia A Cook, Meghan N Cichocki, Yanlin Tong, Lu Wang, Kevin C Chung","doi":"10.1142/S2424835524500371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Clinical quality measures exist for non-operative management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Factors predicting adherence are unclear. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective cohort study of patients with chronic CTS using MarketScan Research Database (2015-2020) was conducted. Six logistic regression models were designed to study adherence to quality measures within 1 year after diagnosis. <b>Results:</b> Of 782,717 patients identified, 514,073 (65.7%) were female with an average (SD) age of 51.4 (13.4) years. Only 88 patients (0.01%) met all quality measures. Greatest compliance observed with receipt of nerve conduction study (NCS; 283,959 [36.3%]), no prescription of medications (336,297 [43.0%]) and no laser therapy (772,979 [98.8%]); 294,305 patients (37.6%) received hand surgeon referral. Hand surgeon referral predicted higher likelihood of NCS and splinting (OR, 1.83; 95% CI: 1.81-1.84; OR, 2.53; 95% CI: 2.50-2.56) and medication over-prescription (OR, 1.05; 95% CI: 1.00-1.10). Females were more likely to be referred to a hand surgeon and be referred for splinting (OR 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01-1.03; OR 1.19; 95% CI: 1.18-1.21) but less likely to have no prescriptions or avoid laser therapy (OR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.84-0.85; OR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.79-0.86). Medicare recipients adhered less to quality measures compared to patients with fee-for-service insurance. As comorbidities increased, patients were less likely to receive hand surgeon referral and carpal tunnel release. <b>Conclusions:</b> Findings suggest that hand surgery referrals increased adherence to quality measures. Females, Medicare recipients and multimorbid patients should be targeted for improved care. Future quality care efforts should incentivise adherence for Medicare beneficiaries and improve guideline recognition amongst physicians. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level III (Therapeutic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":"408-417"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835524500371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical quality measures exist for non-operative management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Factors predicting adherence are unclear. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients with chronic CTS using MarketScan Research Database (2015-2020) was conducted. Six logistic regression models were designed to study adherence to quality measures within 1 year after diagnosis. Results: Of 782,717 patients identified, 514,073 (65.7%) were female with an average (SD) age of 51.4 (13.4) years. Only 88 patients (0.01%) met all quality measures. Greatest compliance observed with receipt of nerve conduction study (NCS; 283,959 [36.3%]), no prescription of medications (336,297 [43.0%]) and no laser therapy (772,979 [98.8%]); 294,305 patients (37.6%) received hand surgeon referral. Hand surgeon referral predicted higher likelihood of NCS and splinting (OR, 1.83; 95% CI: 1.81-1.84; OR, 2.53; 95% CI: 2.50-2.56) and medication over-prescription (OR, 1.05; 95% CI: 1.00-1.10). Females were more likely to be referred to a hand surgeon and be referred for splinting (OR 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01-1.03; OR 1.19; 95% CI: 1.18-1.21) but less likely to have no prescriptions or avoid laser therapy (OR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.84-0.85; OR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.79-0.86). Medicare recipients adhered less to quality measures compared to patients with fee-for-service insurance. As comorbidities increased, patients were less likely to receive hand surgeon referral and carpal tunnel release. Conclusions: Findings suggest that hand surgery referrals increased adherence to quality measures. Females, Medicare recipients and multimorbid patients should be targeted for improved care. Future quality care efforts should incentivise adherence for Medicare beneficiaries and improve guideline recognition amongst physicians. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).

腕管综合征患者对非手术临床质量标准的遵守情况。
背景:针对腕管综合征(CTS)的非手术治疗存在临床质量标准。预测坚持治疗的因素尚不明确。方法:使用 MarketScan 对慢性 CTS 患者进行回顾性队列研究:利用 MarketScan 研究数据库(2015-2020 年)对慢性 CTS 患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。设计了六个逻辑回归模型来研究确诊后 1 年内对质量措施的依从性。研究结果在782,717名被确认的患者中,514,073人(65.7%)为女性,平均(标清)年龄为51.4(13.4)岁。只有 88 名患者(0.01%)符合所有质量标准。接受神经传导研究(NCS;283,959 [36.3%])、未处方药物(336,297 [43.0%])和未接受激光治疗(772,979 [98.8%])的依从性最高;294,305 名患者(37.6%)接受了手外科医生转诊。手外科医生转诊预示着较高的非手术治疗和夹板治疗可能性(OR,1.83;95% CI:1.81-1.84;OR,2.53;95% CI:2.50-2.56)和药物过量处方可能性(OR,1.05;95% CI:1.00-1.10)。女性更有可能被转诊至手部外科医生并接受夹板治疗(OR 1.02;95% CI:1.01-1.03;OR 1.19;95% CI:1.18-1.21),但没有处方或避免激光治疗的可能性较低(OR 0.85,95% CI:0.84-0.85;OR 0.82,95% CI:0.79-0.86)。与享受付费服务的患者相比,医疗保险的受益者较少遵守质量标准。随着合并症的增加,患者接受手外科医生转诊和腕管松解术的可能性较低。结论:研究结果表明,手外科转诊可提高对质量标准的依从性。女性、医疗保险受益人和多病患者应成为改善护理的目标。未来的优质护理工作应激励医疗保险受益人坚持治疗,并提高医生对指南的认可度。证据等级:三级(治疗)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
304
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信