Deep learning to predict risk of lateral skull base cerebrospinal fluid leak or encephalocele.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Steven D Curry, Kieran S Boochoon, Geoffrey C Casazza, Daniel L Surdell, Justin A Cramer
{"title":"Deep learning to predict risk of lateral skull base cerebrospinal fluid leak or encephalocele.","authors":"Steven D Curry, Kieran S Boochoon, Geoffrey C Casazza, Daniel L Surdell, Justin A Cramer","doi":"10.1007/s11548-024-03259-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Skull base features, including increased foramen ovale (FO) cross-sectional area, are associated with lateral skull base spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid (sCSF) leak and encephalocele. Manual measurement requires skill in interpreting imaging studies and is time consuming. The goal of this study was to develop a fully automated deep learning method for FO segmentation and to determine the predictive value in identifying patients with sCSF leak or encephalocele.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care academic hospital of 34 adults with lateral skull base sCSF leak or encephalocele were compared with 815 control patients from 2013-2021. A convolutional neural network (CNN) was constructed for image segmentation of axial computed tomography (CT) studies. Predicted FO segmentations were compared to manual segmentations, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>295 CTs were used for training and validation of the CNN. A separate dataset of 554 control CTs was matched 5:1 on age and sex with the sCSF leak/encephalocele group. The mean Dice score was 0.81. The sCSF leak/encephalocele group had greater mean (SD) FO cross-sectional area compared to the control group, 29.0 (7.7) mm<sup>2</sup> versus 24.3 (7.6) mm<sup>2</sup> (P = .002, 95% confidence interval 0.02-0.08). The area under the ROC curve was 0.69.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CNNs can be used to segment the cross-sectional area of the FO accurately and efficiently. Used together with other predictors, this method could be used as part of a clinical tool to predict the risk of sCSF leak or encephalocele.</p>","PeriodicalId":51251,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2453-2461"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-024-03259-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Skull base features, including increased foramen ovale (FO) cross-sectional area, are associated with lateral skull base spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid (sCSF) leak and encephalocele. Manual measurement requires skill in interpreting imaging studies and is time consuming. The goal of this study was to develop a fully automated deep learning method for FO segmentation and to determine the predictive value in identifying patients with sCSF leak or encephalocele.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study at a tertiary care academic hospital of 34 adults with lateral skull base sCSF leak or encephalocele were compared with 815 control patients from 2013-2021. A convolutional neural network (CNN) was constructed for image segmentation of axial computed tomography (CT) studies. Predicted FO segmentations were compared to manual segmentations, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed.

Results: 295 CTs were used for training and validation of the CNN. A separate dataset of 554 control CTs was matched 5:1 on age and sex with the sCSF leak/encephalocele group. The mean Dice score was 0.81. The sCSF leak/encephalocele group had greater mean (SD) FO cross-sectional area compared to the control group, 29.0 (7.7) mm2 versus 24.3 (7.6) mm2 (P = .002, 95% confidence interval 0.02-0.08). The area under the ROC curve was 0.69.

Conclusion: CNNs can be used to segment the cross-sectional area of the FO accurately and efficiently. Used together with other predictors, this method could be used as part of a clinical tool to predict the risk of sCSF leak or encephalocele.

Abstract Image

深度学习预测侧颅底脑脊液漏或脑积水的风险。
目的:颅底特征,包括卵圆孔(FO)横截面积增大,与侧颅底自发性脑脊液(sCSF)漏和脑疝有关。人工测量需要熟练的影像学解读技巧,而且费时费力。本研究的目标是开发一种全自动深度学习方法来进行 FO 分割,并确定其在识别 sCSF 漏或脑积水患者方面的预测价值:2013-2021年,一家三级医疗学术医院对34名患有侧颅底sCSF漏或脑积水的成人进行了回顾性队列研究,并与815名对照组患者进行了比较。研究人员构建了一个卷积神经网络(CNN),用于轴向计算机断层扫描(CT)研究的图像分割。将预测的 FO 分割与人工分割进行比较,并构建接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)。另一个包含 554 张对照 CT 的数据集与 sCSF 漏/颅脑损伤组在年龄和性别上进行了 5:1 匹配。平均 Dice 得分为 0.81。与对照组相比,sCSF 漏/颅脑损伤组的平均(标清)FO 横截面面积更大,为 29.0 (7.7) mm2 对 24.3 (7.6) mm2(P = .002,95% 置信区间为 0.02-0.08)。ROC 曲线下面积为 0.69:CNN 可用于准确、高效地分割 FO 的横截面积。该方法与其他预测指标一起使用,可作为临床工具的一部分,用于预测 sCSF 漏或脑积水的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
243
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (IJCARS) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides a platform for closing the gap between medical and technical disciplines, and encourages interdisciplinary research and development activities in an international environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信