Texture Feature Differentiation of Glioblastoma and Solitary Brain Metastases Based on Tumor and Tumor-brain Interface.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Academic Radiology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-31 DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2024.08.025
Yini Chen, Hongsen Lin, Jiayi Sun, Renwang Pu, Yujing Zhou, Bo Sun
{"title":"Texture Feature Differentiation of Glioblastoma and Solitary Brain Metastases Based on Tumor and Tumor-brain Interface.","authors":"Yini Chen, Hongsen Lin, Jiayi Sun, Renwang Pu, Yujing Zhou, Bo Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2024.08.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>Texture features, derived from both the entire tumor area and the region of the tumor-to-brain interface, are crucial indicators for distinguishing tumor types and their degrees of malignancy. However, the discriminative value of texture features from both regions for identifying glioblastomas and metastatic tumors has not been thoroughly explored. The aim of this study is to develop and validate a diagnostic model that combines texture features from the entire tumor area and a 10 mm tumor-to-brain interface region, in an attempt to identify more stable and effective texture features.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We retrospectively collected enhanced T1-weighted imaging data from 97 patients with glioblastoma (GBM) and 90 patients with single brain metastasis (SBM) between 2010 and 2024. Machine learning is used to establish multiple diagnostic models for discriminating GBM and SBM based on texture features of the entire tumor and 10 mm tumor-to-brain interface regions. Results underwent evaluation through 5-fold cross-validation analysis, calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for each model. The performance of each model was compared using the Delong test, and the interpretability of the optimized model was further augmented by employing Shapley additive explanations (SHAP).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AUCs for all pipelines in the validation dataset were compared using FeAture Explorer (FAE) software. Among the models established by Kruskal-Wallis(KW) and Logistic Regression(LR), the AUC was highest using the \"one-standard error\" rule. '10mm_glrlm_GrayLevelNonUniformity' was considered the most stable and predictive feature. The best models in the training set, test set, and validation set were not the same. In the test set, the KW1LR model had the highest AUC of 0.880 and an accuracy of 0.824.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The texture feature model that combines the overall tumor and the tumor-brain interface is beneficial for distinguishing glioblastoma from solitary metastatic tumors, and the texture features of the tumor interface exhibit higher heterogeneity.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"400-410"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2024.08.025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale and objectives: Texture features, derived from both the entire tumor area and the region of the tumor-to-brain interface, are crucial indicators for distinguishing tumor types and their degrees of malignancy. However, the discriminative value of texture features from both regions for identifying glioblastomas and metastatic tumors has not been thoroughly explored. The aim of this study is to develop and validate a diagnostic model that combines texture features from the entire tumor area and a 10 mm tumor-to-brain interface region, in an attempt to identify more stable and effective texture features.

Method: We retrospectively collected enhanced T1-weighted imaging data from 97 patients with glioblastoma (GBM) and 90 patients with single brain metastasis (SBM) between 2010 and 2024. Machine learning is used to establish multiple diagnostic models for discriminating GBM and SBM based on texture features of the entire tumor and 10 mm tumor-to-brain interface regions. Results underwent evaluation through 5-fold cross-validation analysis, calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for each model. The performance of each model was compared using the Delong test, and the interpretability of the optimized model was further augmented by employing Shapley additive explanations (SHAP).

Results: The AUCs for all pipelines in the validation dataset were compared using FeAture Explorer (FAE) software. Among the models established by Kruskal-Wallis(KW) and Logistic Regression(LR), the AUC was highest using the "one-standard error" rule. '10mm_glrlm_GrayLevelNonUniformity' was considered the most stable and predictive feature. The best models in the training set, test set, and validation set were not the same. In the test set, the KW1LR model had the highest AUC of 0.880 and an accuracy of 0.824.

Conclusion: The texture feature model that combines the overall tumor and the tumor-brain interface is beneficial for distinguishing glioblastoma from solitary metastatic tumors, and the texture features of the tumor interface exhibit higher heterogeneity.

基于肿瘤和肿瘤-脑界面的胶质母细胞瘤和单发脑转移瘤的纹理特征区分
理由和目标:从整个肿瘤区域和肿瘤与脑界面区域提取的纹理特征是区分肿瘤类型及其恶性程度的关键指标。然而,这两个区域的纹理特征在识别胶质母细胞瘤和转移性肿瘤方面的鉴别价值尚未得到深入探讨。本研究旨在开发和验证一种诊断模型,该模型结合了整个肿瘤区域和 10 毫米肿瘤与脑界面区域的纹理特征,试图找出更稳定、更有效的纹理特征:方法:我们回顾性地收集了2010年至2024年间97例胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)和单发脑转移瘤(SBM)患者的增强T1加权成像数据。根据整个肿瘤和 10 毫米肿瘤与脑界面区域的纹理特征,利用机器学习建立了多种诊断模型,用于区分 GBM 和 SBM。结果通过 5 倍交叉验证分析进行评估,计算每个模型的接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)。使用德隆测试比较了每个模型的性能,并通过使用夏普利加法解释(SHAP)进一步增强了优化模型的可解释性:使用 FeAture Explorer(FAE)软件对验证数据集中所有管道的 AUC 进行了比较。在通过 Relief 和自动编码器(AE)建立的模型中,使用 "一个标准误差 "规则的 AUC 最高。10mm_glrlm_GrayLevelNon-Uniformity "被认为是最稳定和最具预测性的特征。训练集、测试集和验证集中的最佳模型并不相同。在测试集中,Relief19AE 模型的 AUC 最高,为 0.869,准确率为 0.857:结合整体肿瘤和肿瘤-脑界面的纹理特征模型有利于区分胶质母细胞瘤和单发转移性肿瘤,而且肿瘤界面的纹理特征表现出更高的异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信